Cargando…

Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v.2017 for the categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with gadoxetic acid compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Ying, Rao, Sheng-xiang, Wang, Wen-tao, Chen, Cai-zhong, Li, Ren-chen, Zeng, Mengsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0183-3
_version_ 1783379485919281152
author Ding, Ying
Rao, Sheng-xiang
Wang, Wen-tao
Chen, Cai-zhong
Li, Ren-chen
Zeng, Mengsu
author_facet Ding, Ying
Rao, Sheng-xiang
Wang, Wen-tao
Chen, Cai-zhong
Li, Ren-chen
Zeng, Mengsu
author_sort Ding, Ying
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v.2017 for the categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with gadoxetic acid compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 141 high-risk patients with 145 pathologically-confirmed HCCs who first underwent gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced 1.5-T MRI. Two independent radiologists evaluated the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories after considering ancillary features on both MRIs. Finally, the sensitivity of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and the frequencies of major HCC features were compared between gadoxetic acid- and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T MRI using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCCs was significantly different between gadoxetic acid- and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (73.8% [107/145] vs 26.2% [38/145], P < 0.001; 71% [103/145] vs 29% [42/145], P < 0.001 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among the major HCC LI-RADS features, capsule appearance was less frequently demonstrated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI than on gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (3.4% [5/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.793; 4.1% [6/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.87 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively), and the frequency of arterial hyperenhancement was not significantly different between gadoxetic acid and gadopentetate dimeglumine (89% [129/145] vs 89% [129/145], P = 1.000). In addition, the frequency of a washout appearance was less in the transitional phase (TP) than in the portal venous phase (PVP) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (43% [46/107] vs 57% [61/107], P = 0.367). CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI showed a comparable sensitivity to gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of HCCs, and LI-RADS category 4 (LR-4) hepatic nodules were upgraded to LR-5 when taking into account the major features according to LI-RADS v.2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6286579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62865792018-12-14 Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017) Ding, Ying Rao, Sheng-xiang Wang, Wen-tao Chen, Cai-zhong Li, Ren-chen Zeng, Mengsu Cancer Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v.2017 for the categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with gadoxetic acid compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 141 high-risk patients with 145 pathologically-confirmed HCCs who first underwent gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced 1.5-T MRI. Two independent radiologists evaluated the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories after considering ancillary features on both MRIs. Finally, the sensitivity of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and the frequencies of major HCC features were compared between gadoxetic acid- and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T MRI using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCCs was significantly different between gadoxetic acid- and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (73.8% [107/145] vs 26.2% [38/145], P < 0.001; 71% [103/145] vs 29% [42/145], P < 0.001 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among the major HCC LI-RADS features, capsule appearance was less frequently demonstrated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI than on gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (3.4% [5/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.793; 4.1% [6/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.87 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively), and the frequency of arterial hyperenhancement was not significantly different between gadoxetic acid and gadopentetate dimeglumine (89% [129/145] vs 89% [129/145], P = 1.000). In addition, the frequency of a washout appearance was less in the transitional phase (TP) than in the portal venous phase (PVP) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (43% [46/107] vs 57% [61/107], P = 0.367). CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI showed a comparable sensitivity to gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of HCCs, and LI-RADS category 4 (LR-4) hepatic nodules were upgraded to LR-5 when taking into account the major features according to LI-RADS v.2017. BioMed Central 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6286579/ /pubmed/30526674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0183-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ding, Ying
Rao, Sheng-xiang
Wang, Wen-tao
Chen, Cai-zhong
Li, Ren-chen
Zeng, Mengsu
Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
title Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
title_full Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
title_fullStr Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
title_short Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
title_sort comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 t using the liver imaging reporting and data system (li-rads v.2017)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0183-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dingying comparisonofgadoxeticacidversusgadopentetatedimeglumineforthedetectionofhepatocellularcarcinomaat15tusingtheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2017
AT raoshengxiang comparisonofgadoxeticacidversusgadopentetatedimeglumineforthedetectionofhepatocellularcarcinomaat15tusingtheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2017
AT wangwentao comparisonofgadoxeticacidversusgadopentetatedimeglumineforthedetectionofhepatocellularcarcinomaat15tusingtheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2017
AT chencaizhong comparisonofgadoxeticacidversusgadopentetatedimeglumineforthedetectionofhepatocellularcarcinomaat15tusingtheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2017
AT lirenchen comparisonofgadoxeticacidversusgadopentetatedimeglumineforthedetectionofhepatocellularcarcinomaat15tusingtheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2017
AT zengmengsu comparisonofgadoxeticacidversusgadopentetatedimeglumineforthedetectionofhepatocellularcarcinomaat15tusingtheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2017