Cargando…

Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI

For vision, audition and tactile sense, the optimal stimulus frequency for fMRI is somewhat known. For proprioception, i.e., the “movement sense”, however, the optimal frequency is unknown. We studied the effect of passive-finger-movement frequency on proprioceptive fMRI responses using a novel pneu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nurmi, Timo, Henriksson, Linda, Piitulainen, Harri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559657
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00477
_version_ 1783379551787679744
author Nurmi, Timo
Henriksson, Linda
Piitulainen, Harri
author_facet Nurmi, Timo
Henriksson, Linda
Piitulainen, Harri
author_sort Nurmi, Timo
collection PubMed
description For vision, audition and tactile sense, the optimal stimulus frequency for fMRI is somewhat known. For proprioception, i.e., the “movement sense”, however, the optimal frequency is unknown. We studied the effect of passive-finger-movement frequency on proprioceptive fMRI responses using a novel pneumatic-movement actuator. Eleven healthy right-handed volunteers participated in the study. The movement actuator passively moved the participant’s right index finger at frequencies of 0.3, 1, 3, 6, 9, or 12 Hz in a blocked design. A functional localizer was used to define regions-of-interest in SI and SII cortices. In addition, effect of movement range on the fMRI responses was tested in a separate session with 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm movement ranges at a fixed 2 Hz frequency. In primary somatosensory (SI) cortex, the responses were stronger at 3 Hz than at 0.3 Hz (p < 0.001) or 1 Hz (p < 0.05), and at ≥6 Hz than 0.3 Hz (p < 0.001 for frequencies ≥ 6 Hz). In secondary somatosensory (SII) cortex, all movements, except at 0.3 Hz, elicited significant responses of similar strength. In addition, 6, 9, and 12-Hz movements elicited a significant offset response in both SI and SII cortices (p < 0.001–0.05). SI cortex required a total stimulation duration of 4 min to elicit significant activations at the group-level whereas for SII cortex 1 min 20 s was sufficient. Increase in the movement range led to stronger responses in SI cortex, but not in SII cortex. Movements above 3 Hz elicited the strongest SI cortex responses, and increase in the movement range enhanced the response strength. We thus recommend that movements at 3–6 Hz with a movement range of 5 mm or higher to be used in future studies of proprioception. Our results are in-line with previous fMRI and PET studies using tactile or median nerve stimulation at different stimulation frequencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6286983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62869832018-12-17 Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI Nurmi, Timo Henriksson, Linda Piitulainen, Harri Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience For vision, audition and tactile sense, the optimal stimulus frequency for fMRI is somewhat known. For proprioception, i.e., the “movement sense”, however, the optimal frequency is unknown. We studied the effect of passive-finger-movement frequency on proprioceptive fMRI responses using a novel pneumatic-movement actuator. Eleven healthy right-handed volunteers participated in the study. The movement actuator passively moved the participant’s right index finger at frequencies of 0.3, 1, 3, 6, 9, or 12 Hz in a blocked design. A functional localizer was used to define regions-of-interest in SI and SII cortices. In addition, effect of movement range on the fMRI responses was tested in a separate session with 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm movement ranges at a fixed 2 Hz frequency. In primary somatosensory (SI) cortex, the responses were stronger at 3 Hz than at 0.3 Hz (p < 0.001) or 1 Hz (p < 0.05), and at ≥6 Hz than 0.3 Hz (p < 0.001 for frequencies ≥ 6 Hz). In secondary somatosensory (SII) cortex, all movements, except at 0.3 Hz, elicited significant responses of similar strength. In addition, 6, 9, and 12-Hz movements elicited a significant offset response in both SI and SII cortices (p < 0.001–0.05). SI cortex required a total stimulation duration of 4 min to elicit significant activations at the group-level whereas for SII cortex 1 min 20 s was sufficient. Increase in the movement range led to stronger responses in SI cortex, but not in SII cortex. Movements above 3 Hz elicited the strongest SI cortex responses, and increase in the movement range enhanced the response strength. We thus recommend that movements at 3–6 Hz with a movement range of 5 mm or higher to be used in future studies of proprioception. Our results are in-line with previous fMRI and PET studies using tactile or median nerve stimulation at different stimulation frequencies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6286983/ /pubmed/30559657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00477 Text en Copyright © 2018 Nurmi, Henriksson and Piitulainen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Nurmi, Timo
Henriksson, Linda
Piitulainen, Harri
Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI
title Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI
title_full Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI
title_fullStr Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI
title_short Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI
title_sort optimization of proprioceptive stimulation frequency and movement range for fmri
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559657
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00477
work_keys_str_mv AT nurmitimo optimizationofproprioceptivestimulationfrequencyandmovementrangeforfmri
AT henrikssonlinda optimizationofproprioceptivestimulationfrequencyandmovementrangeforfmri
AT piitulainenharri optimizationofproprioceptivestimulationfrequencyandmovementrangeforfmri