Cargando…
Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis
Objective: Cervical bone fractures describe a predominant trauma in the elderly. With demographic change, prone patient positions might create further stress on personnel resources. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct an age-related analysis of pre- and intraoperative process times in pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000126 |
_version_ | 1783379575029366784 |
---|---|
author | Schnoor, Joerg Heyde, Christoph E. Niese-Anke, Mary Friese, Steffen Busch, Thilo Jarvers, Jan-S. |
author_facet | Schnoor, Joerg Heyde, Christoph E. Niese-Anke, Mary Friese, Steffen Busch, Thilo Jarvers, Jan-S. |
author_sort | Schnoor, Joerg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Cervical bone fractures describe a predominant trauma in the elderly. With demographic change, prone patient positions might create further stress on personnel resources. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct an age-related analysis of pre- and intraoperative process times in patients with cervical fractures. Methods: We reviewed all schedules with cervical spine surgery performed at a tertiary hospital. Two different operative patient positions were specified: prone and supine. We retrospectively analysed three study groups: comparison group (group 1: ≤59 years of age), old patients (group 2: 60–79 years), and very old patients (group 3: ≥80 years). We recorded date and kind of surgery, biometric data, and process times by screening recordings of internal software programs (COPRA(®) and SAP 710(®)). Group comparisons were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test and Bonferroni correction, Pearson’s chi-square test, and the Mann-Whitney U test, as required. Results: 330 patients (202 male; 128 female) were analysed. The number of patients in the resulting age-dependent groups 1–3 were n=102, n=123, and n=105, respectively. Patients of increasing age and in supine position showed a continuous increase in the time needed for anaesthesia induction (mean between 4 and 8 minutes (p<0.05). When compared to patients in supine position, this time further increased on average by 6 minutes (p<0.05) in old but prone patients. In old and very old patients, getting a patient into a prone position was associated with a time demand between 10 and 12 minutes (p<0.01), respectively. While time for surgery age-dependently decreased in patients that were supine positioned (p<0.001), surgery time was prolonged between 34 and 104 minutes (p<0.05) in patients that were prone. Conclusion: With prone position both anaesthesia-controlled and surgical-controlled times extended in patients of increasing age. With regard to demographic change, this aspect should be considered for future revenue calculations in flat-rate remuneration systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6287098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62870982018-12-20 Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis Schnoor, Joerg Heyde, Christoph E. Niese-Anke, Mary Friese, Steffen Busch, Thilo Jarvers, Jan-S. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW Article Objective: Cervical bone fractures describe a predominant trauma in the elderly. With demographic change, prone patient positions might create further stress on personnel resources. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct an age-related analysis of pre- and intraoperative process times in patients with cervical fractures. Methods: We reviewed all schedules with cervical spine surgery performed at a tertiary hospital. Two different operative patient positions were specified: prone and supine. We retrospectively analysed three study groups: comparison group (group 1: ≤59 years of age), old patients (group 2: 60–79 years), and very old patients (group 3: ≥80 years). We recorded date and kind of surgery, biometric data, and process times by screening recordings of internal software programs (COPRA(®) and SAP 710(®)). Group comparisons were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test and Bonferroni correction, Pearson’s chi-square test, and the Mann-Whitney U test, as required. Results: 330 patients (202 male; 128 female) were analysed. The number of patients in the resulting age-dependent groups 1–3 were n=102, n=123, and n=105, respectively. Patients of increasing age and in supine position showed a continuous increase in the time needed for anaesthesia induction (mean between 4 and 8 minutes (p<0.05). When compared to patients in supine position, this time further increased on average by 6 minutes (p<0.05) in old but prone patients. In old and very old patients, getting a patient into a prone position was associated with a time demand between 10 and 12 minutes (p<0.01), respectively. While time for surgery age-dependently decreased in patients that were supine positioned (p<0.001), surgery time was prolonged between 34 and 104 minutes (p<0.05) in patients that were prone. Conclusion: With prone position both anaesthesia-controlled and surgical-controlled times extended in patients of increasing age. With regard to demographic change, this aspect should be considered for future revenue calculations in flat-rate remuneration systems. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6287098/ /pubmed/30574446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000126 Text en Copyright © 2018 Schnoor et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Schnoor, Joerg Heyde, Christoph E. Niese-Anke, Mary Friese, Steffen Busch, Thilo Jarvers, Jan-S. Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
title | Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | Prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | prone positioning in the elderly extends perioperative process times: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnoorjoerg pronepositioningintheelderlyextendsperioperativeprocesstimesaretrospectiveanalysis AT heydechristophe pronepositioningintheelderlyextendsperioperativeprocesstimesaretrospectiveanalysis AT nieseankemary pronepositioningintheelderlyextendsperioperativeprocesstimesaretrospectiveanalysis AT friesesteffen pronepositioningintheelderlyextendsperioperativeprocesstimesaretrospectiveanalysis AT buschthilo pronepositioningintheelderlyextendsperioperativeprocesstimesaretrospectiveanalysis AT jarversjans pronepositioningintheelderlyextendsperioperativeprocesstimesaretrospectiveanalysis |