Cargando…
Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AAI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429288 http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800683 |
_version_ | 1783379575998251008 |
---|---|
author | Mallon, Dermot H. Kling, Christiane Robb, Matthew Ellinghaus, Eva Bradley, J. Andrew Taylor, Craig J. Kabelitz, Dieter Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis |
author_facet | Mallon, Dermot H. Kling, Christiane Robb, Matthew Ellinghaus, Eva Bradley, J. Andrew Taylor, Craig J. Kabelitz, Dieter Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis |
author_sort | Mallon, Dermot H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6287104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | AAI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62871042018-12-11 Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential Mallon, Dermot H. Kling, Christiane Robb, Matthew Ellinghaus, Eva Bradley, J. Andrew Taylor, Craig J. Kabelitz, Dieter Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis J Immunol Novel Immunological Methods In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation. AAI 2018-12-15 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6287104/ /pubmed/30429288 http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800683 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 Unported license. |
spellingShingle | Novel Immunological Methods Mallon, Dermot H. Kling, Christiane Robb, Matthew Ellinghaus, Eva Bradley, J. Andrew Taylor, Craig J. Kabelitz, Dieter Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential |
title | Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential |
title_full | Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential |
title_fullStr | Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential |
title_short | Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential |
title_sort | predicting humoral alloimmunity from differences in donor and recipient hla surface electrostatic potential |
topic | Novel Immunological Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429288 http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mallondermoth predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT klingchristiane predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT robbmatthew predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT ellinghauseva predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT bradleyjandrew predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT taylorcraigj predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT kabelitzdieter predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential AT kosmoliaptsisvasilis predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential |