Cargando…

Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential

In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallon, Dermot H., Kling, Christiane, Robb, Matthew, Ellinghaus, Eva, Bradley, J. Andrew, Taylor, Craig J., Kabelitz, Dieter, Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429288
http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800683
_version_ 1783379575998251008
author Mallon, Dermot H.
Kling, Christiane
Robb, Matthew
Ellinghaus, Eva
Bradley, J. Andrew
Taylor, Craig J.
Kabelitz, Dieter
Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis
author_facet Mallon, Dermot H.
Kling, Christiane
Robb, Matthew
Ellinghaus, Eva
Bradley, J. Andrew
Taylor, Craig J.
Kabelitz, Dieter
Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis
author_sort Mallon, Dermot H.
collection PubMed
description In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6287104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AAI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62871042018-12-11 Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential Mallon, Dermot H. Kling, Christiane Robb, Matthew Ellinghaus, Eva Bradley, J. Andrew Taylor, Craig J. Kabelitz, Dieter Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis J Immunol Novel Immunological Methods In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation. AAI 2018-12-15 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6287104/ /pubmed/30429288 http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800683 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 Unported license.
spellingShingle Novel Immunological Methods
Mallon, Dermot H.
Kling, Christiane
Robb, Matthew
Ellinghaus, Eva
Bradley, J. Andrew
Taylor, Craig J.
Kabelitz, Dieter
Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis
Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
title Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
title_full Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
title_fullStr Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
title_short Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential
title_sort predicting humoral alloimmunity from differences in donor and recipient hla surface electrostatic potential
topic Novel Immunological Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429288
http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800683
work_keys_str_mv AT mallondermoth predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT klingchristiane predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT robbmatthew predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT ellinghauseva predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT bradleyjandrew predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT taylorcraigj predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT kabelitzdieter predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential
AT kosmoliaptsisvasilis predictinghumoralalloimmunityfromdifferencesindonorandrecipienthlasurfaceelectrostaticpotential