Cargando…

Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases

Introduction: Ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique provides high union rate with the added benefits of early weight-bearing, and the unique advantage of its ability to promote regeneration of soft tissue around the bone, including skin, muscle and neuro-vascular structures, and its versati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan, O, Fahad, S, Sattar, S, Umer, M, Rashid, H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555643
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1811.006
_version_ 1783379582142906368
author Hasan, O
Fahad, S
Sattar, S
Umer, M
Rashid, H
author_facet Hasan, O
Fahad, S
Sattar, S
Umer, M
Rashid, H
author_sort Hasan, O
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique provides high union rate with the added benefits of early weight-bearing, and the unique advantage of its ability to promote regeneration of soft tissue around the bone, including skin, muscle and neuro-vascular structures, and its versatility to allow correction of the position of the foot by adjusting the frame post-operatively as needed. We describe our experience with this technique and the functional outcomes in our patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 20 ankle fusion cases using the Ilizarov method between the years 2007 and 2017. We defined success in treatment by loss of preoperative symptoms and radiological union on plain radiographs of the ankle. Results: Fusion was achieved in all patients (100%). Immediate post-operative ambulation was with full weight bearing (FWB) in 16 (83%) of the participants and non-weight bearing (NWB) in 3 patients (17%). Post-procedure 11 patients (67%) of the participants who were full weight bearing required some form of support for walking for 2-3 weeks. Post-operatively three patients had pin tract infection requiring intravenous antibiotics. Radiological union took range of 6-12 weeks, mean union time was 8 weeks. Only one patient required bone grafting due to bone loss. Average follow-up period was 10-45 months. Conclusion: The Ilizarov technique has a high union rate and leads to general favourable clinical outcome and may be considered for any ankle arthrodesis but is especially useful in complex cases such as for revisions, soft-tissue compromise, infection and in patients with risk for non-union. Early weight bearing is an extra benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6287131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62871312018-12-14 Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases Hasan, O Fahad, S Sattar, S Umer, M Rashid, H Malays Orthop J Original Article Introduction: Ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique provides high union rate with the added benefits of early weight-bearing, and the unique advantage of its ability to promote regeneration of soft tissue around the bone, including skin, muscle and neuro-vascular structures, and its versatility to allow correction of the position of the foot by adjusting the frame post-operatively as needed. We describe our experience with this technique and the functional outcomes in our patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 20 ankle fusion cases using the Ilizarov method between the years 2007 and 2017. We defined success in treatment by loss of preoperative symptoms and radiological union on plain radiographs of the ankle. Results: Fusion was achieved in all patients (100%). Immediate post-operative ambulation was with full weight bearing (FWB) in 16 (83%) of the participants and non-weight bearing (NWB) in 3 patients (17%). Post-procedure 11 patients (67%) of the participants who were full weight bearing required some form of support for walking for 2-3 weeks. Post-operatively three patients had pin tract infection requiring intravenous antibiotics. Radiological union took range of 6-12 weeks, mean union time was 8 weeks. Only one patient required bone grafting due to bone loss. Average follow-up period was 10-45 months. Conclusion: The Ilizarov technique has a high union rate and leads to general favourable clinical outcome and may be considered for any ankle arthrodesis but is especially useful in complex cases such as for revisions, soft-tissue compromise, infection and in patients with risk for non-union. Early weight bearing is an extra benefit. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6287131/ /pubmed/30555643 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1811.006 Text en © 2018 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Article
Hasan, O
Fahad, S
Sattar, S
Umer, M
Rashid, H
Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases
title Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases
title_full Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases
title_fullStr Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases
title_full_unstemmed Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases
title_short Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases
title_sort ankle arthrodesis using ilizarov ring fixator: a primary or salvage procedure? an analysis of twenty cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555643
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1811.006
work_keys_str_mv AT hasano anklearthrodesisusingilizarovringfixatoraprimaryorsalvageprocedureananalysisoftwentycases
AT fahads anklearthrodesisusingilizarovringfixatoraprimaryorsalvageprocedureananalysisoftwentycases
AT sattars anklearthrodesisusingilizarovringfixatoraprimaryorsalvageprocedureananalysisoftwentycases
AT umerm anklearthrodesisusingilizarovringfixatoraprimaryorsalvageprocedureananalysisoftwentycases
AT rashidh anklearthrodesisusingilizarovringfixatoraprimaryorsalvageprocedureananalysisoftwentycases