Cargando…

Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches

BACKGROUND: To overcome obstacles within the Slovenian organised cervical cancer screening programme, a randomised pilot study of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among non-attenders was performed, aiming to assess three different screening approaches. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Non-attenders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivanus, Urska, Jerman, Tine, Fokter, Alenka Repse, Takac, Iztok, Prevodnik, Veronika Kloboves, Marcec, Mateja, Gajsek, Ursula Salobir, Pakiz, Maja, Koren, Jakob, Celik, Simona Hutter, Kramberger, Kristina Gornik, Klopcic, Ulrika, Kavalar, Rajko, Zatler, Simona Sramek, Kuzmanov, Biljana Grcar, Florjancic, Mojca, Nolde, Natasa, Novakovic, Srdjan, Poljak, Mario, Zakelj, Maja Primic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30216191
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0036
_version_ 1783379593818800128
author Ivanus, Urska
Jerman, Tine
Fokter, Alenka Repse
Takac, Iztok
Prevodnik, Veronika Kloboves
Marcec, Mateja
Gajsek, Ursula Salobir
Pakiz, Maja
Koren, Jakob
Celik, Simona Hutter
Kramberger, Kristina Gornik
Klopcic, Ulrika
Kavalar, Rajko
Zatler, Simona Sramek
Kuzmanov, Biljana Grcar
Florjancic, Mojca
Nolde, Natasa
Novakovic, Srdjan
Poljak, Mario
Zakelj, Maja Primic
author_facet Ivanus, Urska
Jerman, Tine
Fokter, Alenka Repse
Takac, Iztok
Prevodnik, Veronika Kloboves
Marcec, Mateja
Gajsek, Ursula Salobir
Pakiz, Maja
Koren, Jakob
Celik, Simona Hutter
Kramberger, Kristina Gornik
Klopcic, Ulrika
Kavalar, Rajko
Zatler, Simona Sramek
Kuzmanov, Biljana Grcar
Florjancic, Mojca
Nolde, Natasa
Novakovic, Srdjan
Poljak, Mario
Zakelj, Maja Primic
author_sort Ivanus, Urska
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To overcome obstacles within the Slovenian organised cervical cancer screening programme, a randomised pilot study of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among non-attenders was performed, aiming to assess three different screening approaches. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Non-attenders aged 30–64 years from two Slovenian regions were randomised to two HPV self-sampling groups–the opt-in (I1, n = 14.400) and the opt-out (I2, n = 9.556), with a control group (P, n = 2.600). Self-collected samples were analysed using the Hybrid Capture 2 assay. HPV-positive women were invited to a colposcopy. The overall and type-specific intention-to-screen response rates and histological outcomes with a positive predictive value (PPV) according to the women’s age, the screening approach, the level of protection resulting from previous screening history, and the region of residence were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 26.556 women enrolled, 8.972 (33.8%) responded with self-sample for HPV testing and/or traditional cytology within one year of enrolment. Response rates were 37.7%, 34.0% and 18.4% (p < 0.050) for opt-out, opt-in and control groups. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2+ was diagnosed in 3.9/1.000, 3.4/1.000, and 3.1/1.000 women (p > 0.050), respectively. PPV of the HPV self-sampling was 12.0% and 9.6% for CIN2+ and CIN3+. The highest PPV was obtained in non-attenders in screening programme for more than 10-years and concordant results of HPV testing with 40.8% for CIN2+ and 38.8% for CIN3+. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that a high response to HPV self-sampling can be achieved also in an opt-in approach, if women are encouraged to choose between self-sampling at home and screening with gynaecologist. In addition, clinically important risk difference for a high-grade cervical lesion exists in the case of a positive result of HPV testing on self-collected samples, depending on the length of the interval since last screening. Stratified management of these women should be strongly considered. Women who were not screened with cytology for at least 10 years should be referred to immediate colposcopy for histology verification instead to delayed re-testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6287183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62871832018-12-18 Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches Ivanus, Urska Jerman, Tine Fokter, Alenka Repse Takac, Iztok Prevodnik, Veronika Kloboves Marcec, Mateja Gajsek, Ursula Salobir Pakiz, Maja Koren, Jakob Celik, Simona Hutter Kramberger, Kristina Gornik Klopcic, Ulrika Kavalar, Rajko Zatler, Simona Sramek Kuzmanov, Biljana Grcar Florjancic, Mojca Nolde, Natasa Novakovic, Srdjan Poljak, Mario Zakelj, Maja Primic Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: To overcome obstacles within the Slovenian organised cervical cancer screening programme, a randomised pilot study of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among non-attenders was performed, aiming to assess three different screening approaches. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Non-attenders aged 30–64 years from two Slovenian regions were randomised to two HPV self-sampling groups–the opt-in (I1, n = 14.400) and the opt-out (I2, n = 9.556), with a control group (P, n = 2.600). Self-collected samples were analysed using the Hybrid Capture 2 assay. HPV-positive women were invited to a colposcopy. The overall and type-specific intention-to-screen response rates and histological outcomes with a positive predictive value (PPV) according to the women’s age, the screening approach, the level of protection resulting from previous screening history, and the region of residence were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 26.556 women enrolled, 8.972 (33.8%) responded with self-sample for HPV testing and/or traditional cytology within one year of enrolment. Response rates were 37.7%, 34.0% and 18.4% (p < 0.050) for opt-out, opt-in and control groups. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2+ was diagnosed in 3.9/1.000, 3.4/1.000, and 3.1/1.000 women (p > 0.050), respectively. PPV of the HPV self-sampling was 12.0% and 9.6% for CIN2+ and CIN3+. The highest PPV was obtained in non-attenders in screening programme for more than 10-years and concordant results of HPV testing with 40.8% for CIN2+ and 38.8% for CIN3+. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that a high response to HPV self-sampling can be achieved also in an opt-in approach, if women are encouraged to choose between self-sampling at home and screening with gynaecologist. In addition, clinically important risk difference for a high-grade cervical lesion exists in the case of a positive result of HPV testing on self-collected samples, depending on the length of the interval since last screening. Stratified management of these women should be strongly considered. Women who were not screened with cytology for at least 10 years should be referred to immediate colposcopy for histology verification instead to delayed re-testing. Sciendo 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6287183/ /pubmed/30216191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0036 Text en © 2018 Urska Ivanus, Tine Jerman, Alenka Repse Fokter, Iztok Takac, Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik, Mateja Marcec, Ursula Salobir Gajsek, Maja Pakiz, Jakob Koren, Simona Hutter Celik, Kristina Gornik Kramberger, Ulrika Klopcic, Rajko Kavalar, Simona Sramek Zatler, Biljana Grcar Kuzmanov, Mojca Florjancic, Natasa Nolde, Srdjan Novakovic, Mario Poljak, Maja Primic Zakelj, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ivanus, Urska
Jerman, Tine
Fokter, Alenka Repse
Takac, Iztok
Prevodnik, Veronika Kloboves
Marcec, Mateja
Gajsek, Ursula Salobir
Pakiz, Maja
Koren, Jakob
Celik, Simona Hutter
Kramberger, Kristina Gornik
Klopcic, Ulrika
Kavalar, Rajko
Zatler, Simona Sramek
Kuzmanov, Biljana Grcar
Florjancic, Mojca
Nolde, Natasa
Novakovic, Srdjan
Poljak, Mario
Zakelj, Maja Primic
Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches
title Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches
title_full Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches
title_fullStr Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches
title_short Randomised Trial of HPV Self-sampling Among Non-attenders in the Slovenian Cervical Screening Programme ZORA: Comparing Three Different Screening Approaches
title_sort randomised trial of hpv self-sampling among non-attenders in the slovenian cervical screening programme zora: comparing three different screening approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30216191
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0036
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanusurska randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT jermantine randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT fokteralenkarepse randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT takaciztok randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT prevodnikveronikakloboves randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT marcecmateja randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT gajsekursulasalobir randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT pakizmaja randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT korenjakob randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT celiksimonahutter randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT krambergerkristinagornik randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT klopciculrika randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT kavalarrajko randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT zatlersimonasramek randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT kuzmanovbiljanagrcar randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT florjancicmojca randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT noldenatasa randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT novakovicsrdjan randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT poljakmario randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches
AT zakeljmajaprimic randomisedtrialofhpvselfsamplingamongnonattendersinthesloveniancervicalscreeningprogrammezoracomparingthreedifferentscreeningapproaches