Cargando…

Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?

Wider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lukić, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0021
_version_ 1783379601195532288
author Lukić, Vera
author_facet Lukić, Vera
author_sort Lukić, Vera
collection PubMed
description Wider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of patients. Moreover, manual entering of patients data and ordering tests on analyzers was problematic and time consuming. After completing tests, laboratory personnel had to write results in patient register (with potential errors) and provide invoices for health insurance organisation. First LIS brought forward some advantages with regards to these obstacles, but it also showed various weaknesses. These can be summarised in rigidity of system and inability to fulfil user expectation. After 4 years of use, we replaced this system with another LIS. Hence, the main aim of this paper is to evaluate advant ages of using LIS in laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute and also to discuss further possibilities for its application. After implementing LIS, admission procedure has proven to be much faster. LIS enabled electronic requests, barcoded specimens prevent identification errors, bidirectional interface replaces redundant data entry steps, QC data are transferred automatically, results are electronically validated and automatically archived in data base, billing information is transferred electronically, and more. We also use some advanced options, like delta check, HIL feature, quality indicators and various types of reports. All steps in total testing process are drastically improved after the implementation of LIS, which had a positive impact on the quality of issued laboratory results. However, we expect development of some new features in the future, for example auto-verification and inventory management. On the example of the laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute, we show that it is crucial that laboratory specialists have the main role in defining desirable characteristics of LIS which institution aims to buy. This paper suggests that the main feature of LIS should be the flexibility of system and capability of adjustment to user needs and requests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6287214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62872142018-12-18 Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? Lukić, Vera J Med Biochem Review Paper Wider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of patients. Moreover, manual entering of patients data and ordering tests on analyzers was problematic and time consuming. After completing tests, laboratory personnel had to write results in patient register (with potential errors) and provide invoices for health insurance organisation. First LIS brought forward some advantages with regards to these obstacles, but it also showed various weaknesses. These can be summarised in rigidity of system and inability to fulfil user expectation. After 4 years of use, we replaced this system with another LIS. Hence, the main aim of this paper is to evaluate advant ages of using LIS in laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute and also to discuss further possibilities for its application. After implementing LIS, admission procedure has proven to be much faster. LIS enabled electronic requests, barcoded specimens prevent identification errors, bidirectional interface replaces redundant data entry steps, QC data are transferred automatically, results are electronically validated and automatically archived in data base, billing information is transferred electronically, and more. We also use some advanced options, like delta check, HIL feature, quality indicators and various types of reports. All steps in total testing process are drastically improved after the implementation of LIS, which had a positive impact on the quality of issued laboratory results. However, we expect development of some new features in the future, for example auto-verification and inventory management. On the example of the laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute, we show that it is crucial that laboratory specialists have the main role in defining desirable characteristics of LIS which institution aims to buy. This paper suggests that the main feature of LIS should be the flexibility of system and capability of adjustment to user needs and requests. Sciendo 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6287214/ /pubmed/30564059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0021 Text en © 2017 Vera Lukić, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Lukić, Vera
Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
title Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
title_full Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
title_fullStr Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
title_short Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
title_sort laboratory information system – where are we today?
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT lukicvera laboratoryinformationsystemwherearewetoday