Cargando…
Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?
Wider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0021 |
_version_ | 1783379601195532288 |
---|---|
author | Lukić, Vera |
author_facet | Lukić, Vera |
author_sort | Lukić, Vera |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of patients. Moreover, manual entering of patients data and ordering tests on analyzers was problematic and time consuming. After completing tests, laboratory personnel had to write results in patient register (with potential errors) and provide invoices for health insurance organisation. First LIS brought forward some advantages with regards to these obstacles, but it also showed various weaknesses. These can be summarised in rigidity of system and inability to fulfil user expectation. After 4 years of use, we replaced this system with another LIS. Hence, the main aim of this paper is to evaluate advant ages of using LIS in laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute and also to discuss further possibilities for its application. After implementing LIS, admission procedure has proven to be much faster. LIS enabled electronic requests, barcoded specimens prevent identification errors, bidirectional interface replaces redundant data entry steps, QC data are transferred automatically, results are electronically validated and automatically archived in data base, billing information is transferred electronically, and more. We also use some advanced options, like delta check, HIL feature, quality indicators and various types of reports. All steps in total testing process are drastically improved after the implementation of LIS, which had a positive impact on the quality of issued laboratory results. However, we expect development of some new features in the future, for example auto-verification and inventory management. On the example of the laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute, we show that it is crucial that laboratory specialists have the main role in defining desirable characteristics of LIS which institution aims to buy. This paper suggests that the main feature of LIS should be the flexibility of system and capability of adjustment to user needs and requests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6287214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62872142018-12-18 Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? Lukić, Vera J Med Biochem Review Paper Wider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of patients. Moreover, manual entering of patients data and ordering tests on analyzers was problematic and time consuming. After completing tests, laboratory personnel had to write results in patient register (with potential errors) and provide invoices for health insurance organisation. First LIS brought forward some advantages with regards to these obstacles, but it also showed various weaknesses. These can be summarised in rigidity of system and inability to fulfil user expectation. After 4 years of use, we replaced this system with another LIS. Hence, the main aim of this paper is to evaluate advant ages of using LIS in laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute and also to discuss further possibilities for its application. After implementing LIS, admission procedure has proven to be much faster. LIS enabled electronic requests, barcoded specimens prevent identification errors, bidirectional interface replaces redundant data entry steps, QC data are transferred automatically, results are electronically validated and automatically archived in data base, billing information is transferred electronically, and more. We also use some advanced options, like delta check, HIL feature, quality indicators and various types of reports. All steps in total testing process are drastically improved after the implementation of LIS, which had a positive impact on the quality of issued laboratory results. However, we expect development of some new features in the future, for example auto-verification and inventory management. On the example of the laboratory of the Railway Health Care Institute, we show that it is crucial that laboratory specialists have the main role in defining desirable characteristics of LIS which institution aims to buy. This paper suggests that the main feature of LIS should be the flexibility of system and capability of adjustment to user needs and requests. Sciendo 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6287214/ /pubmed/30564059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0021 Text en © 2017 Vera Lukić, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Lukić, Vera Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? |
title | Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? |
title_full | Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? |
title_fullStr | Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? |
title_short | Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today? |
title_sort | laboratory information system – where are we today? |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukicvera laboratoryinformationsystemwherearewetoday |