Cargando…

Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples

OBJECTIVES: Detection of genomic alterations in diseases can be achieved with current molecular technologies. However, the molecules extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bio-samples are often limited possibly due to DNA fragmentation and crosslinking caused by the sample fixation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, X.J. David, Liu, Kelly Y.P., Zhu, Yuqi Sarah, Cui, Cindy, Poh, Catherine F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001
_version_ 1783379659589681152
author Lu, X.J. David
Liu, Kelly Y.P.
Zhu, Yuqi Sarah
Cui, Cindy
Poh, Catherine F.
author_facet Lu, X.J. David
Liu, Kelly Y.P.
Zhu, Yuqi Sarah
Cui, Cindy
Poh, Catherine F.
author_sort Lu, X.J. David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Detection of genomic alterations in diseases can be achieved with current molecular technologies. However, the molecules extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bio-samples are often limited possibly due to DNA fragmentation and crosslinking caused by the sample fixation and processing. The study objective was to design a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to assess the quality and quantity of DNA derived from various DNA extraction conditions on FFPE samples. METHODS: We used 10 μm-thick sections from 5 FFPE oral tumoral blocks, each consisting of 10–15 sections. The protocol variables tested included: 1) tissue staining; 2) duration and 3) temperature of post-digestion heat treatment; and 4) DNA extraction method. DNA quantity was assessed using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), the Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and a ddPCR-based assay. DNA quality was assessed using a ddPCR assay for the degree of fragmentation and the effectiveness of removing crosslinks with varying guanine-cytosine (GC)-content. RESULTS: Deparaffinization with xylene helped to increase the DNA yield. Tissue staining (methyl green staining, pH 6) prior to microdissection, comparing to no staining, caused additional DNA fragmentation. Compared to column-based method, DNA extracted with phenol chloroform and ethanol precipitation increased the degree of fragmentation and lowered the yield of amplifiable DNA. The cross-linking derived from GC-contents may not be the only factor impacting on the DNA quality. CONCLUSIONS: Samples undergoing different pre-treatment conditions prior to extraction can impact the yield of amplifiable DNA. Our ddPCR assay can be used to assess for both DNA quantity and quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6287546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62875462018-12-17 Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples Lu, X.J. David Liu, Kelly Y.P. Zhu, Yuqi Sarah Cui, Cindy Poh, Catherine F. Biomol Detect Quantif Article OBJECTIVES: Detection of genomic alterations in diseases can be achieved with current molecular technologies. However, the molecules extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bio-samples are often limited possibly due to DNA fragmentation and crosslinking caused by the sample fixation and processing. The study objective was to design a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to assess the quality and quantity of DNA derived from various DNA extraction conditions on FFPE samples. METHODS: We used 10 μm-thick sections from 5 FFPE oral tumoral blocks, each consisting of 10–15 sections. The protocol variables tested included: 1) tissue staining; 2) duration and 3) temperature of post-digestion heat treatment; and 4) DNA extraction method. DNA quantity was assessed using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), the Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and a ddPCR-based assay. DNA quality was assessed using a ddPCR assay for the degree of fragmentation and the effectiveness of removing crosslinks with varying guanine-cytosine (GC)-content. RESULTS: Deparaffinization with xylene helped to increase the DNA yield. Tissue staining (methyl green staining, pH 6) prior to microdissection, comparing to no staining, caused additional DNA fragmentation. Compared to column-based method, DNA extracted with phenol chloroform and ethanol precipitation increased the degree of fragmentation and lowered the yield of amplifiable DNA. The cross-linking derived from GC-contents may not be the only factor impacting on the DNA quality. CONCLUSIONS: Samples undergoing different pre-treatment conditions prior to extraction can impact the yield of amplifiable DNA. Our ddPCR assay can be used to assess for both DNA quantity and quality. Elsevier 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6287546/ /pubmed/30560062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lu, X.J. David
Liu, Kelly Y.P.
Zhu, Yuqi Sarah
Cui, Cindy
Poh, Catherine F.
Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples
title Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples
title_full Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples
title_fullStr Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples
title_full_unstemmed Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples
title_short Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples
title_sort using ddpcr to assess the dna yield of ffpe samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT luxjdavid usingddpcrtoassessthednayieldofffpesamples
AT liukellyyp usingddpcrtoassessthednayieldofffpesamples
AT zhuyuqisarah usingddpcrtoassessthednayieldofffpesamples
AT cuicindy usingddpcrtoassessthednayieldofffpesamples
AT pohcatherinef usingddpcrtoassessthednayieldofffpesamples