Cargando…
The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
OBJECTIVE: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a universal healthcare coverage plan now covering over 98% of rural residents in China, first implemented in 2003. Rising costs in the face of modest gains in health and financial protections have raised questions about the cost-effective...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208297 |
_version_ | 1783379703861608448 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Jinjing Deaton, Shelby Jiao, Boshen Rosen, Zohn Muennig, Peter A. |
author_facet | Wu, Jinjing Deaton, Shelby Jiao, Boshen Rosen, Zohn Muennig, Peter A. |
author_sort | Wu, Jinjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a universal healthcare coverage plan now covering over 98% of rural residents in China, first implemented in 2003. Rising costs in the face of modest gains in health and financial protections have raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of the NCMS. METHODS: Using the most recent estimates of the NCMS’s health and economic consequences from a comprehensive review of the literature, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model for a hypothetical cohort between ages 20 and 100. We then did one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations to explore whether the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) falls below 37,059 international dollars [Int$], the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times per capita GDP of China in 2013. FINDINGS: The ICER of the NCMS over the lifetime of an average 20-year-old rural resident in China was about Int$71,480 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (95% confidence interval: cost-saving, Int$845,659/QALY). There was less than a 33% chance that the system was cost-saving or met the WTP threshold. However, the NCMS did fall under the threshold when changes in the program costs, the risk of mortality and hypertension, and the likelihood of labor force participation were tested in one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The NCMS appears to be economically inefficient in its current form. Further cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted in designing insurance benefit packages to ensure that the NCMS fund goes toward health care that has a good value in improving survival and quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6287900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62879002018-12-28 The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China Wu, Jinjing Deaton, Shelby Jiao, Boshen Rosen, Zohn Muennig, Peter A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a universal healthcare coverage plan now covering over 98% of rural residents in China, first implemented in 2003. Rising costs in the face of modest gains in health and financial protections have raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of the NCMS. METHODS: Using the most recent estimates of the NCMS’s health and economic consequences from a comprehensive review of the literature, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model for a hypothetical cohort between ages 20 and 100. We then did one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations to explore whether the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) falls below 37,059 international dollars [Int$], the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times per capita GDP of China in 2013. FINDINGS: The ICER of the NCMS over the lifetime of an average 20-year-old rural resident in China was about Int$71,480 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (95% confidence interval: cost-saving, Int$845,659/QALY). There was less than a 33% chance that the system was cost-saving or met the WTP threshold. However, the NCMS did fall under the threshold when changes in the program costs, the risk of mortality and hypertension, and the likelihood of labor force participation were tested in one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The NCMS appears to be economically inefficient in its current form. Further cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted in designing insurance benefit packages to ensure that the NCMS fund goes toward health care that has a good value in improving survival and quality of life. Public Library of Science 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6287900/ /pubmed/30532135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208297 Text en © 2018 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Jinjing Deaton, Shelby Jiao, Boshen Rosen, Zohn Muennig, Peter A. The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China |
title | The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China |
title_full | The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China |
title_fullStr | The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China |
title_short | The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of the new rural cooperative medical scheme in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujinjing thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT deatonshelby thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT jiaoboshen thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT rosenzohn thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT muennigpetera thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT wujinjing costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT deatonshelby costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT jiaoboshen costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT rosenzohn costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina AT muennigpetera costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina |