Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China

OBJECTIVE: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a universal healthcare coverage plan now covering over 98% of rural residents in China, first implemented in 2003. Rising costs in the face of modest gains in health and financial protections have raised questions about the cost-effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jinjing, Deaton, Shelby, Jiao, Boshen, Rosen, Zohn, Muennig, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208297
_version_ 1783379703861608448
author Wu, Jinjing
Deaton, Shelby
Jiao, Boshen
Rosen, Zohn
Muennig, Peter A.
author_facet Wu, Jinjing
Deaton, Shelby
Jiao, Boshen
Rosen, Zohn
Muennig, Peter A.
author_sort Wu, Jinjing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a universal healthcare coverage plan now covering over 98% of rural residents in China, first implemented in 2003. Rising costs in the face of modest gains in health and financial protections have raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of the NCMS. METHODS: Using the most recent estimates of the NCMS’s health and economic consequences from a comprehensive review of the literature, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model for a hypothetical cohort between ages 20 and 100. We then did one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations to explore whether the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) falls below 37,059 international dollars [Int$], the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times per capita GDP of China in 2013. FINDINGS: The ICER of the NCMS over the lifetime of an average 20-year-old rural resident in China was about Int$71,480 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (95% confidence interval: cost-saving, Int$845,659/QALY). There was less than a 33% chance that the system was cost-saving or met the WTP threshold. However, the NCMS did fall under the threshold when changes in the program costs, the risk of mortality and hypertension, and the likelihood of labor force participation were tested in one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The NCMS appears to be economically inefficient in its current form. Further cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted in designing insurance benefit packages to ensure that the NCMS fund goes toward health care that has a good value in improving survival and quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6287900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62879002018-12-28 The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China Wu, Jinjing Deaton, Shelby Jiao, Boshen Rosen, Zohn Muennig, Peter A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a universal healthcare coverage plan now covering over 98% of rural residents in China, first implemented in 2003. Rising costs in the face of modest gains in health and financial protections have raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of the NCMS. METHODS: Using the most recent estimates of the NCMS’s health and economic consequences from a comprehensive review of the literature, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model for a hypothetical cohort between ages 20 and 100. We then did one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations to explore whether the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) falls below 37,059 international dollars [Int$], the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times per capita GDP of China in 2013. FINDINGS: The ICER of the NCMS over the lifetime of an average 20-year-old rural resident in China was about Int$71,480 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (95% confidence interval: cost-saving, Int$845,659/QALY). There was less than a 33% chance that the system was cost-saving or met the WTP threshold. However, the NCMS did fall under the threshold when changes in the program costs, the risk of mortality and hypertension, and the likelihood of labor force participation were tested in one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The NCMS appears to be economically inefficient in its current form. Further cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted in designing insurance benefit packages to ensure that the NCMS fund goes toward health care that has a good value in improving survival and quality of life. Public Library of Science 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6287900/ /pubmed/30532135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208297 Text en © 2018 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Jinjing
Deaton, Shelby
Jiao, Boshen
Rosen, Zohn
Muennig, Peter A.
The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
title The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
title_full The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
title_short The cost-effectiveness analysis of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of the new rural cooperative medical scheme in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208297
work_keys_str_mv AT wujinjing thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT deatonshelby thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT jiaoboshen thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT rosenzohn thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT muennigpetera thecosteffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT wujinjing costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT deatonshelby costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT jiaoboshen costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT rosenzohn costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina
AT muennigpetera costeffectivenessanalysisofthenewruralcooperativemedicalschemeinchina