Cargando…

Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE: We measured the thicknesses of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), the macula, and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic macula holes to analyze the repeatability of these measurements and compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Woo Hyuk, Jo, Young Joon, Kim, Jung Yeul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30549475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0030
_version_ 1783379716585029632
author Lee, Woo Hyuk
Jo, Young Joon
Kim, Jung Yeul
author_facet Lee, Woo Hyuk
Jo, Young Joon
Kim, Jung Yeul
author_sort Lee, Woo Hyuk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We measured the thicknesses of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), the macula, and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic macula holes to analyze the repeatability of these measurements and compare them with those of the fellow eye. METHODS: We evaluated 85 patients who visited our retinal clinic. The patients were divided into two groups according to their macular hole size: group A had a size of <400 µm, while group B had a size of ≥400 µm. Repeatability was determined by comparing the thicknesses of the GCIPL, macula, and RNFL with those of the normal fellow eye. RESULTS: The average central macular thickness in patients with macular holes was significantly thicker than that in the normal fellow eye (343.8 ± 78.6 vs. 252.6 ± 62.3 µm, p < 0.001). The average thickness of the GCIPL in patients with macular holes was significantly thinner than that in the normal fellow eye (56.1 ± 23.4 vs. 77.1 ± 12.8 µm, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average RNFL thickness between eyes with macular holes and fellow eyes (92.4 ± 10.0 vs. 95.5 ± 10.7 µm, p = 0.070). There were also no significant differences in the thicknesses of the GCIPL and RNFL among the two groups (p = 0.786 and p = 0.516). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the macula and RNFL were 0.994 and 0.974, respectively, in patients with macular holes, while that for the GCIPL was 0.700. CONCLUSIONS: Macular contour change with macular hole results in low repeatability and a tendency of thinner measurement regarding GCIPL thickness determined via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The impact of changes in the macular shape caused by macular holes should be taken into consideration when measuring the GCIPL thickness in patients with various eye diseases such as glaucoma and in those with neuro-ophthalmic disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62880142018-12-17 Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Lee, Woo Hyuk Jo, Young Joon Kim, Jung Yeul Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: We measured the thicknesses of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), the macula, and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic macula holes to analyze the repeatability of these measurements and compare them with those of the fellow eye. METHODS: We evaluated 85 patients who visited our retinal clinic. The patients were divided into two groups according to their macular hole size: group A had a size of <400 µm, while group B had a size of ≥400 µm. Repeatability was determined by comparing the thicknesses of the GCIPL, macula, and RNFL with those of the normal fellow eye. RESULTS: The average central macular thickness in patients with macular holes was significantly thicker than that in the normal fellow eye (343.8 ± 78.6 vs. 252.6 ± 62.3 µm, p < 0.001). The average thickness of the GCIPL in patients with macular holes was significantly thinner than that in the normal fellow eye (56.1 ± 23.4 vs. 77.1 ± 12.8 µm, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average RNFL thickness between eyes with macular holes and fellow eyes (92.4 ± 10.0 vs. 95.5 ± 10.7 µm, p = 0.070). There were also no significant differences in the thicknesses of the GCIPL and RNFL among the two groups (p = 0.786 and p = 0.516). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the macula and RNFL were 0.994 and 0.974, respectively, in patients with macular holes, while that for the GCIPL was 0.700. CONCLUSIONS: Macular contour change with macular hole results in low repeatability and a tendency of thinner measurement regarding GCIPL thickness determined via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The impact of changes in the macular shape caused by macular holes should be taken into consideration when measuring the GCIPL thickness in patients with various eye diseases such as glaucoma and in those with neuro-ophthalmic disorders. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018-12 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6288014/ /pubmed/30549475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0030 Text en © 2018 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Woo Hyuk
Jo, Young Joon
Kim, Jung Yeul
Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_fullStr Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_short Thickness of the Macula, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell-inner Plexiform Layer in the Macular Hole: The Repeatability Study of Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_sort thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer in the macular hole: the repeatability study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30549475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0030
work_keys_str_mv AT leewoohyuk thicknessofthemacularetinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerinthemacularholetherepeatabilitystudyofspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT joyoungjoon thicknessofthemacularetinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerinthemacularholetherepeatabilitystudyofspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT kimjungyeul thicknessofthemacularetinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerinthemacularholetherepeatabilitystudyofspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography