Cargando…

Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients

BACKGROUND: Young implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients are prone to complications and inappropriate shocks (IAS). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) may avoid lead-related complications. This study aims to describe the incidence and nature of device-related complications in young transven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quast, A. B. E., Brouwer, T. F., Kooiman, K. M., van Dessel, P. F. H. M, Blom, N. A., Wilde, A. A. M., Knops, R. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1186-1
_version_ 1783379721059303424
author Quast, A. B. E.
Brouwer, T. F.
Kooiman, K. M.
van Dessel, P. F. H. M
Blom, N. A.
Wilde, A. A. M.
Knops, R. E.
author_facet Quast, A. B. E.
Brouwer, T. F.
Kooiman, K. M.
van Dessel, P. F. H. M
Blom, N. A.
Wilde, A. A. M.
Knops, R. E.
author_sort Quast, A. B. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Young implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients are prone to complications and inappropriate shocks (IAS). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) may avoid lead-related complications. This study aims to describe the incidence and nature of device-related complications in young transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) and S‑ICD patients. METHODS: Single-chamber TV-ICD and S‑ICD patients up to and including the age of 25 years implanted between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Complications were defined as device-related complications requiring surgical intervention. IAS were defined as shocks for anything other than ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Follow-up data were collected 5 years post-implantation. Kaplan-Meier estimates for complications at 5‑year follow-up were calculated with a corresponding 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (46 TV-ICD, 35 S-ICD) were included (median age 19.0 (IQR 16.0–23.0) and 16.5 (IQR 13.0–20.2) years respectively). Median follow-up was 60 and 40 months respectively. All-cause complication rate was 34% in the TV-ICD group and 25% in the S‑ICD group (p = 0.64). TV-ICD patients had more lead complications: 23% (10–36%) versus 0% (p = 0.02). The rate of infections did not differ between TV-ICD and S‑ICD: 2% (0–6%) versus 10% (0–21%) (p = 0.15). No systemic infections occurred in the S‑ICD patients. The rates of IAS were similar, TV-ICD 22% (9–35%) versus S‑ICD 14% (0–30%) (p = 0.40), as were those for appropriate shocks: 25% (11–39%) versus 27% (6–48%) (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: The rates of all-cause complications in this cohort were equal, though the nature of the complications differed. S‑ICD patients did not suffer lead failures or systemic infections. An era effect is present between the two groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-018-1186-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62880332018-12-26 Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients Quast, A. B. E. Brouwer, T. F. Kooiman, K. M. van Dessel, P. F. H. M Blom, N. A. Wilde, A. A. M. Knops, R. E. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: Young implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients are prone to complications and inappropriate shocks (IAS). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) may avoid lead-related complications. This study aims to describe the incidence and nature of device-related complications in young transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) and S‑ICD patients. METHODS: Single-chamber TV-ICD and S‑ICD patients up to and including the age of 25 years implanted between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Complications were defined as device-related complications requiring surgical intervention. IAS were defined as shocks for anything other than ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Follow-up data were collected 5 years post-implantation. Kaplan-Meier estimates for complications at 5‑year follow-up were calculated with a corresponding 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (46 TV-ICD, 35 S-ICD) were included (median age 19.0 (IQR 16.0–23.0) and 16.5 (IQR 13.0–20.2) years respectively). Median follow-up was 60 and 40 months respectively. All-cause complication rate was 34% in the TV-ICD group and 25% in the S‑ICD group (p = 0.64). TV-ICD patients had more lead complications: 23% (10–36%) versus 0% (p = 0.02). The rate of infections did not differ between TV-ICD and S‑ICD: 2% (0–6%) versus 10% (0–21%) (p = 0.15). No systemic infections occurred in the S‑ICD patients. The rates of IAS were similar, TV-ICD 22% (9–35%) versus S‑ICD 14% (0–30%) (p = 0.40), as were those for appropriate shocks: 25% (11–39%) versus 27% (6–48%) (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: The rates of all-cause complications in this cohort were equal, though the nature of the complications differed. S‑ICD patients did not suffer lead failures or systemic infections. An era effect is present between the two groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-018-1186-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2018-10-30 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6288033/ /pubmed/30377940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1186-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Quast, A. B. E.
Brouwer, T. F.
Kooiman, K. M.
van Dessel, P. F. H. M
Blom, N. A.
Wilde, A. A. M.
Knops, R. E.
Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
title Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
title_full Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
title_fullStr Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
title_short Comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
title_sort comparison of complications and shocks in paediatric and young transvenous and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1186-1
work_keys_str_mv AT quastabe comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT brouwertf comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT kooimankm comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT vandesselpfhm comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT blomna comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT wildeaam comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients
AT knopsre comparisonofcomplicationsandshocksinpaediatricandyoungtransvenousandsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatients