Cargando…
Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts
BACKGROUND: Active surveillance is recommended for insignificant prostate cancer (PCa). Tools exist to identify suitable candidates using clinical variables. We aimed to develop and validate a novel risk score (NRS) predicting which patients are harbouring insignificant PCa. METHODS: We used prospec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0316-2 |
_version_ | 1783379735819059200 |
---|---|
author | Dutto, Lorenzo Ahmad, Amar Urbanova, Katerina Wagner, Christian Schuette, Andreas Addali, Mustafa Kelly, John D. Sridhar, Ashwin Nathan, Senthil Briggs, Timothy P. Witt, Joern H. Shaw, Gregory L. |
author_facet | Dutto, Lorenzo Ahmad, Amar Urbanova, Katerina Wagner, Christian Schuette, Andreas Addali, Mustafa Kelly, John D. Sridhar, Ashwin Nathan, Senthil Briggs, Timothy P. Witt, Joern H. Shaw, Gregory L. |
author_sort | Dutto, Lorenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Active surveillance is recommended for insignificant prostate cancer (PCa). Tools exist to identify suitable candidates using clinical variables. We aimed to develop and validate a novel risk score (NRS) predicting which patients are harbouring insignificant PCa. METHODS: We used prospectively collected data from 8040 consecutive unscreened patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2006 and 2016. Of these, data from 2799 patients with Gleason 3 + 3 on biopsy were used to develop a multivariate model predicting the presence of insignificant PC at radical prostatectomy (ERSPC updated definition(3): Gleason 3 + 3 only, index tumour volume < 1.3 cm(3) and total tumour volume < 2.5 cm(3)). This was used to develop a novel risk score (NRS) which was validated in an equivalent independent cohort (n = 441). We compared the accuracy of existing predictive tools and the NRS in these cohorts. RESULTS: The NRS (incorporating PSA, prostate volume, age, clinical T Stage, percent and number of positive biopsy cores) outperformed pre-existing predictive tools in derivation and validation cohorts (AUC 0.755 and 0.76, respectively). Selection bias due to analysis of a surgical cohort is acknowledged. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of the NRS is that it can be tailored to patient characteristics and may prove to be valuable tool in clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6288120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62881202019-11-27 Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts Dutto, Lorenzo Ahmad, Amar Urbanova, Katerina Wagner, Christian Schuette, Andreas Addali, Mustafa Kelly, John D. Sridhar, Ashwin Nathan, Senthil Briggs, Timothy P. Witt, Joern H. Shaw, Gregory L. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Active surveillance is recommended for insignificant prostate cancer (PCa). Tools exist to identify suitable candidates using clinical variables. We aimed to develop and validate a novel risk score (NRS) predicting which patients are harbouring insignificant PCa. METHODS: We used prospectively collected data from 8040 consecutive unscreened patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2006 and 2016. Of these, data from 2799 patients with Gleason 3 + 3 on biopsy were used to develop a multivariate model predicting the presence of insignificant PC at radical prostatectomy (ERSPC updated definition(3): Gleason 3 + 3 only, index tumour volume < 1.3 cm(3) and total tumour volume < 2.5 cm(3)). This was used to develop a novel risk score (NRS) which was validated in an equivalent independent cohort (n = 441). We compared the accuracy of existing predictive tools and the NRS in these cohorts. RESULTS: The NRS (incorporating PSA, prostate volume, age, clinical T Stage, percent and number of positive biopsy cores) outperformed pre-existing predictive tools in derivation and validation cohorts (AUC 0.755 and 0.76, respectively). Selection bias due to analysis of a surgical cohort is acknowledged. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of the NRS is that it can be tailored to patient characteristics and may prove to be valuable tool in clinical decision-making. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-27 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6288120/ /pubmed/30478408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0316-2 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Article Dutto, Lorenzo Ahmad, Amar Urbanova, Katerina Wagner, Christian Schuette, Andreas Addali, Mustafa Kelly, John D. Sridhar, Ashwin Nathan, Senthil Briggs, Timothy P. Witt, Joern H. Shaw, Gregory L. Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
title | Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
title_full | Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
title_short | Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
title_sort | development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0316-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duttolorenzo developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT ahmadamar developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT urbanovakaterina developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT wagnerchristian developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT schuetteandreas developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT addalimustafa developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT kellyjohnd developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT sridharashwin developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT nathansenthil developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT briggstimothyp developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT wittjoernh developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts AT shawgregoryl developmentandvalidationofanovelriskscoreforthedetectionofinsignificantprostatecancerinunscreenedpatientcohorts |