Cargando…

Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents

Background: Auditory-evoked brain potentials (AEPs) are widely used to assess depth of the sedative component of general anesthesia. Depth of sedation as induced by hypnotic drugs (e.g., propofol) is characterized by a gradual decline of mid-latency cortical AEPs (10–50 ms). Using the decline of mid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Supp, Gernot G., Higgen, Focko L., Hipp, Joerg F., Engel, Andreas K., Siegel, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01427
_version_ 1783379755162140672
author Supp, Gernot G.
Higgen, Focko L.
Hipp, Joerg F.
Engel, Andreas K.
Siegel, Markus
author_facet Supp, Gernot G.
Higgen, Focko L.
Hipp, Joerg F.
Engel, Andreas K.
Siegel, Markus
author_sort Supp, Gernot G.
collection PubMed
description Background: Auditory-evoked brain potentials (AEPs) are widely used to assess depth of the sedative component of general anesthesia. Depth of sedation as induced by hypnotic drugs (e.g., propofol) is characterized by a gradual decline of mid-latency cortical AEPs (10–50 ms). Using the decline of mid-latency AEPs as a reliable index for sedation requires its robustness against confounding pharmaceutical influences, e.g., analgesic opioids such as remifentanil. Critically, in this context the following two questions remained unresolved so far: First, it is unclear whether opioids directly affect mid-latency AEPs. Second, high doses of opioids decrease arousal, but it is unknown whether opioid-induced sedation is reflected by the diminution of mid-latency AEPs. We hypothesized that opioids affect mid-latency AEPs and that these effects rely on different mechanisms compared to hypnotic agents. Methods: To address both questions, we performed a series of experiments under the participation of healthy human volunteers. We measured AEPs and quantified participants’ sedation state by a standardized rating scale during stepwise increase of different pharmaceutical agents (remifentanil, propofol or placebo). Results: Our results revealed a decline of mid-latency AEPs during remifentanil medication. This decrease was predicted by drug dose, rather than sedation level. In contrast, attenuation of the mid-latency AEPs during propofol was predicted by sedation level and was not related to hypnotic drug dose. We did not find any drug-induced changes of brainstem AEPs (1–10 ms). Conclusion: As remifentanil reduced mid-latency AEPs without inducing strong sedation levels, a decrease of this evoked brain component does not constitute an unequivocal index for the depth of sedation. These results challenge the use of mid-latency AEPs as a reliable marker of depth of the sedative component of anesthesia if hypnotic drugs are combined with opioids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62882272018-12-18 Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents Supp, Gernot G. Higgen, Focko L. Hipp, Joerg F. Engel, Andreas K. Siegel, Markus Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Auditory-evoked brain potentials (AEPs) are widely used to assess depth of the sedative component of general anesthesia. Depth of sedation as induced by hypnotic drugs (e.g., propofol) is characterized by a gradual decline of mid-latency cortical AEPs (10–50 ms). Using the decline of mid-latency AEPs as a reliable index for sedation requires its robustness against confounding pharmaceutical influences, e.g., analgesic opioids such as remifentanil. Critically, in this context the following two questions remained unresolved so far: First, it is unclear whether opioids directly affect mid-latency AEPs. Second, high doses of opioids decrease arousal, but it is unknown whether opioid-induced sedation is reflected by the diminution of mid-latency AEPs. We hypothesized that opioids affect mid-latency AEPs and that these effects rely on different mechanisms compared to hypnotic agents. Methods: To address both questions, we performed a series of experiments under the participation of healthy human volunteers. We measured AEPs and quantified participants’ sedation state by a standardized rating scale during stepwise increase of different pharmaceutical agents (remifentanil, propofol or placebo). Results: Our results revealed a decline of mid-latency AEPs during remifentanil medication. This decrease was predicted by drug dose, rather than sedation level. In contrast, attenuation of the mid-latency AEPs during propofol was predicted by sedation level and was not related to hypnotic drug dose. We did not find any drug-induced changes of brainstem AEPs (1–10 ms). Conclusion: As remifentanil reduced mid-latency AEPs without inducing strong sedation levels, a decrease of this evoked brain component does not constitute an unequivocal index for the depth of sedation. These results challenge the use of mid-latency AEPs as a reliable marker of depth of the sedative component of anesthesia if hypnotic drugs are combined with opioids. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6288227/ /pubmed/30564126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01427 Text en Copyright © 2018 Supp, Higgen, Hipp, Engel and Siegel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Supp, Gernot G.
Higgen, Focko L.
Hipp, Joerg F.
Engel, Andreas K.
Siegel, Markus
Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents
title Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents
title_full Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents
title_fullStr Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents
title_full_unstemmed Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents
title_short Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials Differentially Predict Sedation and Drug Level Under Opioid and Hypnotic Agents
title_sort mid-latency auditory evoked potentials differentially predict sedation and drug level under opioid and hypnotic agents
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01427
work_keys_str_mv AT suppgernotg midlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsdifferentiallypredictsedationanddruglevelunderopioidandhypnoticagents
AT higgenfockol midlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsdifferentiallypredictsedationanddruglevelunderopioidandhypnoticagents
AT hippjoergf midlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsdifferentiallypredictsedationanddruglevelunderopioidandhypnoticagents
AT engelandreask midlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsdifferentiallypredictsedationanddruglevelunderopioidandhypnoticagents
AT siegelmarkus midlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsdifferentiallypredictsedationanddruglevelunderopioidandhypnoticagents