Cargando…
Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study
Background: Available neuroendocrine biomarkers are considered to have insufficient accuracy to discriminate patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from healthy controls. Recent studies have demonstrated a potential role for circulating neuroendocrine specific transc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00740 |
_version_ | 1783379766163800064 |
---|---|
author | van Treijen, Mark J. C. Korse, Catharina M. van Leeuwaarde, Rachel S. Saveur, Lisette J. Vriens, Menno R. Verbeek, Wieke H. M. Tesselaar, Margot E. T. Valk, Gerlof D. |
author_facet | van Treijen, Mark J. C. Korse, Catharina M. van Leeuwaarde, Rachel S. Saveur, Lisette J. Vriens, Menno R. Verbeek, Wieke H. M. Tesselaar, Margot E. T. Valk, Gerlof D. |
author_sort | van Treijen, Mark J. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Available neuroendocrine biomarkers are considered to have insufficient accuracy to discriminate patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from healthy controls. Recent studies have demonstrated a potential role for circulating neuroendocrine specific transcripts analysis—the NETest—as a more accurate biomarker for NETs compared to available biomarkers. This study was initiated to independently validate the discriminative value of the NETest as well as the association between tumor characteristics and NETest score. Methods: Whole blood samples from 140 consecutive GEP-NET patients and 113 healthy volunteers were collected. Laboratory investigators were blinded to the origin of the samples. NETest results and chromogranin A (CgA) levels were compared with clinical information including radiological imaging to evaluate the association with tumor characteristics. Results: The median NETest score in NET patients was 33 vs. 13% in controls (p < 0.0001). The NETest did not correlate with age, gender, tumor location, grade, load, or stage. Using the cut-off of 14% NETest sensitivity and specificity were 93 and 56%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.87. The optimal cut-off for the NETest in our population was 20%, with sensitivity 89% and specificity 72%. The upper limit of normal for CgA was established as 100 μg/l. Sensitivity and specificity of CgA were 56 and 83% with an AUC of 0.76. CgA correlated with age (rs = 0.388, p < 0.001) and tumor load (rs = 0.458, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The low specificity of the NETest precludes its use as a screening test for GEP-NETs. The superior sensitivity of the NETest over CgA (93 vs. 56%; p < 0.001), irrespective of the stage of the disease, emphasize its potential as a marker of disease presence in follow up as well as an indicator for residual disease after surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6288275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62882752018-12-18 Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study van Treijen, Mark J. C. Korse, Catharina M. van Leeuwaarde, Rachel S. Saveur, Lisette J. Vriens, Menno R. Verbeek, Wieke H. M. Tesselaar, Margot E. T. Valk, Gerlof D. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Background: Available neuroendocrine biomarkers are considered to have insufficient accuracy to discriminate patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from healthy controls. Recent studies have demonstrated a potential role for circulating neuroendocrine specific transcripts analysis—the NETest—as a more accurate biomarker for NETs compared to available biomarkers. This study was initiated to independently validate the discriminative value of the NETest as well as the association between tumor characteristics and NETest score. Methods: Whole blood samples from 140 consecutive GEP-NET patients and 113 healthy volunteers were collected. Laboratory investigators were blinded to the origin of the samples. NETest results and chromogranin A (CgA) levels were compared with clinical information including radiological imaging to evaluate the association with tumor characteristics. Results: The median NETest score in NET patients was 33 vs. 13% in controls (p < 0.0001). The NETest did not correlate with age, gender, tumor location, grade, load, or stage. Using the cut-off of 14% NETest sensitivity and specificity were 93 and 56%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.87. The optimal cut-off for the NETest in our population was 20%, with sensitivity 89% and specificity 72%. The upper limit of normal for CgA was established as 100 μg/l. Sensitivity and specificity of CgA were 56 and 83% with an AUC of 0.76. CgA correlated with age (rs = 0.388, p < 0.001) and tumor load (rs = 0.458, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The low specificity of the NETest precludes its use as a screening test for GEP-NETs. The superior sensitivity of the NETest over CgA (93 vs. 56%; p < 0.001), irrespective of the stage of the disease, emphasize its potential as a marker of disease presence in follow up as well as an indicator for residual disease after surgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6288275/ /pubmed/30564197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00740 Text en Copyright © 2018 van Treijen, Korse, van Leeuwaarde, Saveur, Vriens, Verbeek, Tesselaar and Valk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology van Treijen, Mark J. C. Korse, Catharina M. van Leeuwaarde, Rachel S. Saveur, Lisette J. Vriens, Menno R. Verbeek, Wieke H. M. Tesselaar, Margot E. T. Valk, Gerlof D. Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study |
title | Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study |
title_full | Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study |
title_fullStr | Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study |
title_short | Blood Transcript Profiling for the Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of a Large Independent Validation Study |
title_sort | blood transcript profiling for the detection of neuroendocrine tumors: results of a large independent validation study |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vantreijenmarkjc bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT korsecatharinam bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT vanleeuwaarderachels bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT saveurlisettej bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT vriensmennor bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT verbeekwiekehm bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT tesselaarmargotet bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy AT valkgerlofd bloodtranscriptprofilingforthedetectionofneuroendocrinetumorsresultsofalargeindependentvalidationstudy |