Cargando…

Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato

Resistance (R) genes and endophytic organisms can both protect plants against pathogens. Although the outcome of both processes is the same, little is known about the commonalities and differences between both immune responses. Here we set out to phenotypically characterize both responses in the tom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Lamo, Francisco J., Constantin, Maria E., Fresno, David H., Boeren, Sjef, Rep, Martijn, Takken, Frank L. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564219
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02977
_version_ 1783379777229422592
author de Lamo, Francisco J.
Constantin, Maria E.
Fresno, David H.
Boeren, Sjef
Rep, Martijn
Takken, Frank L. W.
author_facet de Lamo, Francisco J.
Constantin, Maria E.
Fresno, David H.
Boeren, Sjef
Rep, Martijn
Takken, Frank L. W.
author_sort de Lamo, Francisco J.
collection PubMed
description Resistance (R) genes and endophytic organisms can both protect plants against pathogens. Although the outcome of both processes is the same, little is known about the commonalities and differences between both immune responses. Here we set out to phenotypically characterize both responses in the tomato-Fusarium pathosystem, and to identify markers to distinguish these responses at the molecular level. As endophyte Fusarium oxysporum (Fo) strain Fo47 was employed, which confers protection against various pathogens, including the vascular wilt fungus F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (Fol). As R-gene conferring Fol resistance, the I-2 gene of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) was used. Fol colonizes the xylem vessels of susceptible and I-2 resistant tomato plants, but only causes disease in the former. Fol was found to colonize the vasculature of endophyte-colonized plants, and could be isolated from stems of non-diseased plants co-inoculated with Fo47 and Fol. Because the xylem vessels form the main interface between plant and pathogen, the xylem sap proteomes during R gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance (RMR and EMR) were compared using label-free quantitative nLC-MS/MS. Surprisingly, both proteomes were remarkably similar to the mock, revealing only one or two differentially accumulated proteins in the respective resistant interactions. Whereas in I-2 plants the accumulation of the pathogenesis-related protein PR-5x was strongly induced by Fol, the endophyte triggered induction of both NP24, another PR-5 isoform, and of a β-glucanase in the presence of Fol. Notably, over 54% of the identified xylem sap proteins have a predicted intracellular localization, which implies that these might be present in exosomes. In conclusion, whereas both resistance mechanisms permit the pathogen to colonize the vasculature, this does not result in disease and this resistance coincides with specific induction of two distinct PR-5 isoforms and a β-glucanase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62883502018-12-18 Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato de Lamo, Francisco J. Constantin, Maria E. Fresno, David H. Boeren, Sjef Rep, Martijn Takken, Frank L. W. Front Microbiol Microbiology Resistance (R) genes and endophytic organisms can both protect plants against pathogens. Although the outcome of both processes is the same, little is known about the commonalities and differences between both immune responses. Here we set out to phenotypically characterize both responses in the tomato-Fusarium pathosystem, and to identify markers to distinguish these responses at the molecular level. As endophyte Fusarium oxysporum (Fo) strain Fo47 was employed, which confers protection against various pathogens, including the vascular wilt fungus F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (Fol). As R-gene conferring Fol resistance, the I-2 gene of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) was used. Fol colonizes the xylem vessels of susceptible and I-2 resistant tomato plants, but only causes disease in the former. Fol was found to colonize the vasculature of endophyte-colonized plants, and could be isolated from stems of non-diseased plants co-inoculated with Fo47 and Fol. Because the xylem vessels form the main interface between plant and pathogen, the xylem sap proteomes during R gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance (RMR and EMR) were compared using label-free quantitative nLC-MS/MS. Surprisingly, both proteomes were remarkably similar to the mock, revealing only one or two differentially accumulated proteins in the respective resistant interactions. Whereas in I-2 plants the accumulation of the pathogenesis-related protein PR-5x was strongly induced by Fol, the endophyte triggered induction of both NP24, another PR-5 isoform, and of a β-glucanase in the presence of Fol. Notably, over 54% of the identified xylem sap proteins have a predicted intracellular localization, which implies that these might be present in exosomes. In conclusion, whereas both resistance mechanisms permit the pathogen to colonize the vasculature, this does not result in disease and this resistance coincides with specific induction of two distinct PR-5 isoforms and a β-glucanase. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6288350/ /pubmed/30564219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02977 Text en Copyright © 2018 de Lamo, Constantin, Fresno, Boeren, Rep and Takken. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
de Lamo, Francisco J.
Constantin, Maria E.
Fresno, David H.
Boeren, Sjef
Rep, Martijn
Takken, Frank L. W.
Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato
title Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato
title_full Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato
title_fullStr Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato
title_full_unstemmed Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato
title_short Xylem Sap Proteomics Reveals Distinct Differences Between R Gene- and Endophyte-Mediated Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt Disease in Tomato
title_sort xylem sap proteomics reveals distinct differences between r gene- and endophyte-mediated resistance against fusarium wilt disease in tomato
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564219
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02977
work_keys_str_mv AT delamofranciscoj xylemsapproteomicsrevealsdistinctdifferencesbetweenrgeneandendophytemediatedresistanceagainstfusariumwiltdiseaseintomato
AT constantinmariae xylemsapproteomicsrevealsdistinctdifferencesbetweenrgeneandendophytemediatedresistanceagainstfusariumwiltdiseaseintomato
AT fresnodavidh xylemsapproteomicsrevealsdistinctdifferencesbetweenrgeneandendophytemediatedresistanceagainstfusariumwiltdiseaseintomato
AT boerensjef xylemsapproteomicsrevealsdistinctdifferencesbetweenrgeneandendophytemediatedresistanceagainstfusariumwiltdiseaseintomato
AT repmartijn xylemsapproteomicsrevealsdistinctdifferencesbetweenrgeneandendophytemediatedresistanceagainstfusariumwiltdiseaseintomato
AT takkenfranklw xylemsapproteomicsrevealsdistinctdifferencesbetweenrgeneandendophytemediatedresistanceagainstfusariumwiltdiseaseintomato