Cargando…

Evaluating mucosal healing using colon capsule endoscopy predicts outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission

AIM: To examine whether second generation of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE-2) is acceptable for assessing the severity of mucosal inflammation and evaluating mucosal healing using CCE-2 is able to predict outcome in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, especially in clinical remission. METHODS: A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takano, Ryosuke, Osawa, Satoshi, Uotani, Takahiro, Tani, Shinya, Ishida, Natsuki, Tamura, Satoshi, Yamade, Mihoko, Iwaizumi, Moriya, Hamaya, Yasushi, Furuta, Takahisa, Miyajima, Hiroaki, Sugimoto, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568951
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.952
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To examine whether second generation of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE-2) is acceptable for assessing the severity of mucosal inflammation and evaluating mucosal healing using CCE-2 is able to predict outcome in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, especially in clinical remission. METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive UC patients in clinical remission were enrolled to undergo CCE-2. Clinical remission was defined as clinical activity index (CAI) ≤ 4 according to Rachmilewitz index. The rate of total colon observation and colon cleansing level were evaluated. Severity of mucosal inflammation in UC was assessed according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). Relapse-free survival was assessed. Acceptability of CCE-2 was assessed using a questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The rate of total colon observation within its battery life was 93.3%. The proportion of “excellent” plus “good” cleansing level was 73.3%. The rate of mucosal healing (MES 0, 1) assessed by CCE-2 was 77.0%. The relapse-free survival rate was significantly higher in MES 0, 1 than in MES 2, 3 (P = 0.0435), and in UCEIS 0-3 than in UCEIS 4-8 (P = 0.0211), whereas there was no significant difference between CAI 0 and CAI 1-4 groups. A questionnaire survey revealed an overall acceptability of CCE. CONCLUSION: CCE-2 is acceptable for assessing the severity of mucosal inflammation in UC patients, especially in clinical remission. Evaluating mucosal healing using CCE-2 was able to predict outcome.