Cargando…

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: In armed conflict, injuries commonly affect the extremities and contamination with foreign material often increases the risk of infection. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy has been described in the treatment of acute conflict-related wounds, but reports are retrospective and wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Älgå, Andreas, Wong, Sidney, Haweizy, Rawand, Conneryd Lundgren, Kalle, von Schreeb, Johan, Malmstedt, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478024
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12334
_version_ 1783379826826018816
author Älgå, Andreas
Wong, Sidney
Haweizy, Rawand
Conneryd Lundgren, Kalle
von Schreeb, Johan
Malmstedt, Jonas
author_facet Älgå, Andreas
Wong, Sidney
Haweizy, Rawand
Conneryd Lundgren, Kalle
von Schreeb, Johan
Malmstedt, Jonas
author_sort Älgå, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In armed conflict, injuries commonly affect the extremities and contamination with foreign material often increases the risk of infection. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy has been described in the treatment of acute conflict-related wounds, but reports are retrospective and with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of negative-pressure wound therapy use in the treatment of patients with conflict-related extremity wounds. METHODS: This is a multisite, superiority, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. We are considering for inclusion patients 18 years of age and older who are presenting with a conflict-related extremity wound within 72 hours after injury. Patients are block randomly assigned to either negative-pressure wound therapy or standard treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is wound closure by day 5. Secondary end points include length of stay, wound infection, sepsis, wound complications, death, and health-related quality of life. We will explore economic outcomes, including direct health care costs and cost effectiveness, in a substudy. Data are collected at baseline and at each dressing change, and participants are followed for up to 3 months. We will base the primary statistical analysis on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: The trial is ongoing. Patient enrollment started in June 2015. We expect to publish findings from the trial by the end of 2019. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, there has been no randomized trial of negative-pressure wound therapy in this context. We expect that our findings will increase the knowledge to establish best-treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02444598; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02444598 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/72hjI2XNX) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12334
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62885902019-01-03 Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Älgå, Andreas Wong, Sidney Haweizy, Rawand Conneryd Lundgren, Kalle von Schreeb, Johan Malmstedt, Jonas JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: In armed conflict, injuries commonly affect the extremities and contamination with foreign material often increases the risk of infection. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy has been described in the treatment of acute conflict-related wounds, but reports are retrospective and with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of negative-pressure wound therapy use in the treatment of patients with conflict-related extremity wounds. METHODS: This is a multisite, superiority, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. We are considering for inclusion patients 18 years of age and older who are presenting with a conflict-related extremity wound within 72 hours after injury. Patients are block randomly assigned to either negative-pressure wound therapy or standard treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is wound closure by day 5. Secondary end points include length of stay, wound infection, sepsis, wound complications, death, and health-related quality of life. We will explore economic outcomes, including direct health care costs and cost effectiveness, in a substudy. Data are collected at baseline and at each dressing change, and participants are followed for up to 3 months. We will base the primary statistical analysis on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: The trial is ongoing. Patient enrollment started in June 2015. We expect to publish findings from the trial by the end of 2019. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, there has been no randomized trial of negative-pressure wound therapy in this context. We expect that our findings will increase the knowledge to establish best-treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02444598; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02444598 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/72hjI2XNX) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12334 JMIR Publications 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6288590/ /pubmed/30478024 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12334 Text en ©Andreas Älgå, Sidney Wong, Rawand Haweizy, Kalle Conneryd Lundgren, Johan von Schreeb, Jonas Malmstedt. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 26.11.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Älgå, Andreas
Wong, Sidney
Haweizy, Rawand
Conneryd Lundgren, Kalle
von Schreeb, Johan
Malmstedt, Jonas
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment of adult patients with conflict-related extremity wounds: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478024
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12334
work_keys_str_mv AT algaandreas negativepressurewoundtherapyversusstandardtreatmentofadultpatientswithconflictrelatedextremitywoundsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wongsidney negativepressurewoundtherapyversusstandardtreatmentofadultpatientswithconflictrelatedextremitywoundsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haweizyrawand negativepressurewoundtherapyversusstandardtreatmentofadultpatientswithconflictrelatedextremitywoundsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT connerydlundgrenkalle negativepressurewoundtherapyversusstandardtreatmentofadultpatientswithconflictrelatedextremitywoundsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonschreebjohan negativepressurewoundtherapyversusstandardtreatmentofadultpatientswithconflictrelatedextremitywoundsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT malmstedtjonas negativepressurewoundtherapyversusstandardtreatmentofadultpatientswithconflictrelatedextremitywoundsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial