Cargando…

Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome

AIM: To assess potential benefits of an additional unenhanced acquisition in computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS). METHODS: A total of 103 aortic CTA (non-electrocardiography-gated, 128 slices) performed due to suspected AAS were retrospectivel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos, Drüschler, Felix, Simon, Martin, Vogt, Florian M, Wolfrum, Sebastian, Desch, Steffen, Richardt, Doreen, Barkhausen, Jörg, Hunold, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568749
http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.150
_version_ 1783379841095041024
author Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos
Drüschler, Felix
Simon, Martin
Vogt, Florian M
Wolfrum, Sebastian
Desch, Steffen
Richardt, Doreen
Barkhausen, Jörg
Hunold, Peter
author_facet Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos
Drüschler, Felix
Simon, Martin
Vogt, Florian M
Wolfrum, Sebastian
Desch, Steffen
Richardt, Doreen
Barkhausen, Jörg
Hunold, Peter
author_sort Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess potential benefits of an additional unenhanced acquisition in computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS). METHODS: A total of 103 aortic CTA (non-electrocardiography-gated, 128 slices) performed due to suspected AAS were retrospectively evaluated for acute aortic dissection (AAD), intramural hematoma (IMH), or penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Spiral CTA protocol consisted of an unenhanced acquisition and an arterial phase. If AAS was detected, a venous phase (delay, 90 s) was added. Images were evaluated for the presence and extent of AAD, IMH, PAU, and related complications. The diagnostic benefit of the unenhanced acquisition was evaluated concerning detection of IMH. RESULTS: Fifty-six (30% women; mean age, 67 years; median, 68 years) of the screened individuals had AAD or IMH. A triphasic CT scan was conducted in 76.8% (n = 43). 56% of the detected AAD were classified as Stanford type A, 44% as Stanford type B. 53.8% of the detected IMH were classified as Stanford type A, 46.2% as Stanford type B. There was no significant difference in the involvement of the ascending aorta between AAD and IMH (P = 1.0) or in the average age between AAD and IMH (P = 0.548), between Stanford type A and Stanford type B in general (P = 0.650) and between Stanford type A and Stanford type B within the entities of AAD and IMH (AAD: P = 0.785; IMH: P = 0.146). Only the unenhanced acquisitions showed a significant density difference between the adjacent lumen and the IMH (P = 0.035). Subadventitial hematoma involving the pulmonary trunk was present in 5 patients (16%) with Stanford A AAD. The difference between the median radiation exposure of a triphasic (2737 mGy*cm) compared to a biphasic CT scan (2135 mGy*cm) was not significant (P = 0.135). CONCLUSION: IMH is a common and difficult to detect entity of AAS. An additional unenhanced acquisition within an aortic CTA protocol facilitates the detection of IMH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62886742018-12-19 Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos Drüschler, Felix Simon, Martin Vogt, Florian M Wolfrum, Sebastian Desch, Steffen Richardt, Doreen Barkhausen, Jörg Hunold, Peter World J Radiol Retrospective Cohort Study AIM: To assess potential benefits of an additional unenhanced acquisition in computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS). METHODS: A total of 103 aortic CTA (non-electrocardiography-gated, 128 slices) performed due to suspected AAS were retrospectively evaluated for acute aortic dissection (AAD), intramural hematoma (IMH), or penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Spiral CTA protocol consisted of an unenhanced acquisition and an arterial phase. If AAS was detected, a venous phase (delay, 90 s) was added. Images were evaluated for the presence and extent of AAD, IMH, PAU, and related complications. The diagnostic benefit of the unenhanced acquisition was evaluated concerning detection of IMH. RESULTS: Fifty-six (30% women; mean age, 67 years; median, 68 years) of the screened individuals had AAD or IMH. A triphasic CT scan was conducted in 76.8% (n = 43). 56% of the detected AAD were classified as Stanford type A, 44% as Stanford type B. 53.8% of the detected IMH were classified as Stanford type A, 46.2% as Stanford type B. There was no significant difference in the involvement of the ascending aorta between AAD and IMH (P = 1.0) or in the average age between AAD and IMH (P = 0.548), between Stanford type A and Stanford type B in general (P = 0.650) and between Stanford type A and Stanford type B within the entities of AAD and IMH (AAD: P = 0.785; IMH: P = 0.146). Only the unenhanced acquisitions showed a significant density difference between the adjacent lumen and the IMH (P = 0.035). Subadventitial hematoma involving the pulmonary trunk was present in 5 patients (16%) with Stanford A AAD. The difference between the median radiation exposure of a triphasic (2737 mGy*cm) compared to a biphasic CT scan (2135 mGy*cm) was not significant (P = 0.135). CONCLUSION: IMH is a common and difficult to detect entity of AAS. An additional unenhanced acquisition within an aortic CTA protocol facilitates the detection of IMH. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-11-28 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6288674/ /pubmed/30568749 http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.150 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos
Drüschler, Felix
Simon, Martin
Vogt, Florian M
Wolfrum, Sebastian
Desch, Steffen
Richardt, Doreen
Barkhausen, Jörg
Hunold, Peter
Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
title Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
title_full Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
title_fullStr Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
title_short Significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
title_sort significance of an additional unenhanced scan in computed tomography angiography of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568749
http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.150
work_keys_str_mv AT panagiotopoulosnikolaos significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT druschlerfelix significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT simonmartin significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT vogtflorianm significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT wolfrumsebastian significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT deschsteffen significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT richardtdoreen significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT barkhausenjorg significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome
AT hunoldpeter significanceofanadditionalunenhancedscanincomputedtomographyangiographyofpatientswithsuspectedacuteaorticsyndrome