Cargando…

Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service

OBJECTIVES: Evidence on optimal methods for providing STI test results is lacking. We evaluated an online results service, developed as part of an eSexual Health Clinic (eSHC). METHODS: We evaluated the online results service using a mixed-methods approach within large exploratory studies of the eSH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbs, Jo, Aicken, Catherine R H, Sutcliffe, Lorna J, Gkatzidou, Voula, Tickle, Laura J, Hone, Kate, Sadiq, S Tariq, Sonnenberg, Pam, Estcourt, Claudia S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053318
_version_ 1783379847091847168
author Gibbs, Jo
Aicken, Catherine R H
Sutcliffe, Lorna J
Gkatzidou, Voula
Tickle, Laura J
Hone, Kate
Sadiq, S Tariq
Sonnenberg, Pam
Estcourt, Claudia S
author_facet Gibbs, Jo
Aicken, Catherine R H
Sutcliffe, Lorna J
Gkatzidou, Voula
Tickle, Laura J
Hone, Kate
Sadiq, S Tariq
Sonnenberg, Pam
Estcourt, Claudia S
author_sort Gibbs, Jo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evidence on optimal methods for providing STI test results is lacking. We evaluated an online results service, developed as part of an eSexual Health Clinic (eSHC). METHODS: We evaluated the online results service using a mixed-methods approach within large exploratory studies of the eSHC. Participants were chlamydia- positive and negative users of online postal self-sampling services in six National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) areas and chlamydia-positive patients from two genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics between 21 July 2014 and 13 March 2015. Participants received a discreetly worded National Health Service ’NHS no-reply’ text message (SMS) informing them that their test results were ready and providing a weblink to a secure website. Participants logged in with their date of birth and mobile telephone or clinic number. Chlamydia-positive patients were offered online management. All interactions with the eSHC system were automatically logged and their timing recorded. Post-treatment, a service evaluation survey (n=152) and qualitative interviews (n=36) were conducted by telephone. Chlamydia-negative patients were offered a short online survey (n=274). Data were integrated. RESULTS: 92% (134/146) of NCSP chlamydia-positive patients, 82% (161/197) of GUM chlamydia-positive patients and 89% (1776/1997) of NCSP chlamydia-negative participants accessed test results within 7 days. 91% of chlamydia-positive patients were happy with the results service; 64% of those who had tested previously found the results service better or much better than previous experiences. 90% of chlamydia-negative survey participants agreed they would be happy to receive results this way in the future. Interviewees described accessing results with ease and appreciated the privacy and control the two-step process gave them. CONCLUSION: A discreet SMS to alert users/patients that results are available, followed by provision of results via a secure website, was highly acceptable, irrespective of test result and testing history. The eSHC results service afforded users privacy and control over when they viewed results without compromising access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6288705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62887052018-12-27 Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service Gibbs, Jo Aicken, Catherine R H Sutcliffe, Lorna J Gkatzidou, Voula Tickle, Laura J Hone, Kate Sadiq, S Tariq Sonnenberg, Pam Estcourt, Claudia S Sex Transm Infect Digital Communications and Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: Evidence on optimal methods for providing STI test results is lacking. We evaluated an online results service, developed as part of an eSexual Health Clinic (eSHC). METHODS: We evaluated the online results service using a mixed-methods approach within large exploratory studies of the eSHC. Participants were chlamydia- positive and negative users of online postal self-sampling services in six National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) areas and chlamydia-positive patients from two genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics between 21 July 2014 and 13 March 2015. Participants received a discreetly worded National Health Service ’NHS no-reply’ text message (SMS) informing them that their test results were ready and providing a weblink to a secure website. Participants logged in with their date of birth and mobile telephone or clinic number. Chlamydia-positive patients were offered online management. All interactions with the eSHC system were automatically logged and their timing recorded. Post-treatment, a service evaluation survey (n=152) and qualitative interviews (n=36) were conducted by telephone. Chlamydia-negative patients were offered a short online survey (n=274). Data were integrated. RESULTS: 92% (134/146) of NCSP chlamydia-positive patients, 82% (161/197) of GUM chlamydia-positive patients and 89% (1776/1997) of NCSP chlamydia-negative participants accessed test results within 7 days. 91% of chlamydia-positive patients were happy with the results service; 64% of those who had tested previously found the results service better or much better than previous experiences. 90% of chlamydia-negative survey participants agreed they would be happy to receive results this way in the future. Interviewees described accessing results with ease and appreciated the privacy and control the two-step process gave them. CONCLUSION: A discreet SMS to alert users/patients that results are available, followed by provision of results via a secure website, was highly acceptable, irrespective of test result and testing history. The eSHC results service afforded users privacy and control over when they viewed results without compromising access. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6288705/ /pubmed/29326179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053318 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Digital Communications and Sexual Health
Gibbs, Jo
Aicken, Catherine R H
Sutcliffe, Lorna J
Gkatzidou, Voula
Tickle, Laura J
Hone, Kate
Sadiq, S Tariq
Sonnenberg, Pam
Estcourt, Claudia S
Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
title Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
title_full Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
title_fullStr Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
title_full_unstemmed Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
title_short Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
title_sort mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online sti results service
topic Digital Communications and Sexual Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053318
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbsjo mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT aickencatherinerh mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT sutcliffelornaj mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT gkatzidouvoula mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT ticklelauraj mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT honekate mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT sadiqstariq mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT sonnenbergpam mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice
AT estcourtclaudias mixedmethodsevaluationofanovelonlinestiresultsservice