Cargando…

Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial – association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection

BACKGROUND: In imaging-based clinical trials, it is common practice to perform double reads for each image, discrepant interpretations can result from these two different evaluations. In this study we analyzed discrepancies that occurred between local investigators (LI) and blinded independent centr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Beaumont, Hubert, Evans, Tracey L., Klifa, Catherine, Guermazi, Ali, Hong, Sae Rom, Chadjaa, Mustapha, Monostori, Zsuzsanna
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6288919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30537991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0

Ejemplares similares

RECIST 1.1 and lesion selection: How to deal with ambiguity at baseline?
por: Iannessi, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Breaking down the RECIST 1.1 double read variability in lung trials: What do baseline assessments tell us?
por: Iannessi, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Can we predict discordant RECIST 1.1 evaluations in double read clinical trials?
por: Beaumont, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of tumor assessments using RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST, and association with overall survival
por: Manitz, Juliane, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Pooled Analysis
por: Kim, Jung Han, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST
por: Costelloe, Colleen M., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
por: Choi, Hyun Chang, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in patients treated with targeted agents: a pooled analysis and review
por: Kim, Jung Han
Publicado: (2016)

Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction Following PD‐1 Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST Criteria
por: Zhou, Meng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Park, Hyo Jung, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Intra- and inter-observer variability in measurement of target lesions: implication on response evaluation according to RECIST 1.1
por: Muenzel, Daniela, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Patterns of response in metastatic NSCLC during PD‐1 or PD‐L1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria
por: Liang, Hongge, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of iRECIST versus RECIST V.1.1 in patients treated with an anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody: pooled FDA analysis
por: Mulkey, Flora, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Tumor response evaluation criteria for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) treated using TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization): RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) version 1.1 and mRECIST (modified RECIST): JIVROSG-0602
por: Sato, Yozo, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Yield a More Accurate Prognoses Than the RECIST 1.1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization
por: Lee, Jae Seung, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The α-RECIST (RECIST 1.1 Combined With Alpha Fetoprotein): A Novel Tool for Identifying Tumor Response of Conversion-Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Hepatectomy
por: Xu, Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

RECIST rules
por: Sohaib, Aslam
Publicado: (2012)

RECIST 1.1 versus mRECIST for assessment of tumour response to molecular targeted therapies and disease outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Yu, Hongli, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Radiological Tumor Response Based on iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 in Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor Therapy
por: Zheng, Bingjie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Role of Dual-Energy CT for the Assessment of Liver Metastasis Response to Treatment: Above the RECIST 1.1 Criteria
por: Reginelli, Alfonso, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
por: van Persijn van Meerten, Els L., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Volumetric measurements of target lesions: does it improve inter-reader variability for oncological response assessment according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines compared to standard unidimensional measurements?
por: Zimmermann, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of the capability and reproducibility of RECIST 1.1. measurements by technologists in breast cancer follow-up: a pilot study
por: Gouel, Pierrick, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

iRECIST: how to do it
por: Persigehl, Thorsten, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative prognostic implication of treatment response assessments in mCRPC: PERCIST 1.0, RECIST 1.1, and PSA response criteria
por: Velez, Erik M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

RECIST 1.1 and serum thyroglobulin measurements in the evaluation of responses to sorafenib in patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma
por: RUAN, MAOMEI, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Early evaluation of sunitinib for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms via CT imaging: RECIST 1.1 or Choi Criteria?
por: Luo, Yanji, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Differences in sensitivity to new therapies between primary and metastatic breast cancer: A need to stratify the tumor response?
por: Beaumont, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Precision of manual two-dimensional segmentations of lung and liver metastases and its impact on tumour response assessment using RECIST 1.1
por: Cornelis, F. H., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

To Adjudicate or Not Adjudicate: That Is the Question
por: Hicks, Karen A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

RECIST Applied to Realistic Tumor Models
por: Levine, Zachary H., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Imaging tumour response: beyond RECIST
por: Koh, Dow-Mu
Publicado: (2014)

Assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using MRI and FDG-PET/CT-RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0
por: Kitajima, Kazuhiro, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Response assessment in metronomic chemotherapy: RECIST or PERCIST?
por: Agrawal, Archi, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

RECIST criteria: our experience in daily practice
por: De Luca, S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A Letter in Support of Real-World RECIST
por: Gajra, Ajeet, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A New Prognostic Index Combines the Metabolic Response and RECIST 1.1 to Evaluate the Therapeutic Response in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
por: Tang, Wenfang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1.
por: Kumar, Ishan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Prognostic Value of Total Tumor Volume Response Compared With RECIST1.1 in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Systemic Treatment
por: Wesdorp, Nina J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Value of central review of RECIST v1.1 outcomes in the AGITG INTEGRATE randomised phase 2 international trial for advanced oesophago-gastric cancer
por: Sjoquist, Katrin M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ak42s6shpjuqus7ielgkpevqrj