Cargando…
Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization
Laboratory science requires careful maintenance of sterile reagents and tools as well as the sterilization of waste prior to disposal. However, steam autoclaves typically used for this purpose may not be readily accessible to everyone in the scientific community, such as K-12 teachers, researchers i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6289433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208769 |
_version_ | 1783379956940668928 |
---|---|
author | Swenson, Vaille A. Stacy, Amanda D. Gaylor, Michael O. Ushijima, Blake Philmus, Benjamin Cozy, Loralyn M. Videau, Nina M. Videau, Patrick |
author_facet | Swenson, Vaille A. Stacy, Amanda D. Gaylor, Michael O. Ushijima, Blake Philmus, Benjamin Cozy, Loralyn M. Videau, Nina M. Videau, Patrick |
author_sort | Swenson, Vaille A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laboratory science requires careful maintenance of sterile reagents and tools as well as the sterilization of waste prior to disposal. However, steam autoclaves typically used for this purpose may not be readily accessible to everyone in the scientific community, such as K-12 teachers, researchers in the field, students in under-funded laboratories, or persons in the developing world who lack funding and resources. This work examines the use of commercial electric pressure cookers as an alternative method for the sterilization of media, instruments, and waste. Four commonly available brands of pressure cooker were tested for their ability to sterilize microbiological media, a variety of metal instruments, and high-titer microbial cultures. All four pressure cookers were able to sterilize these starting materials as well as a range of microbial types, including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, filamentous fungi, unicellular fungi, and mixed environmental samples. Only the Instant Pot, however, was able to sterilize autoclave tester ampoules of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores. These results suggest that, depending on the nature of the work undertaken, store-bought pressure cookers can be an appropriate substitute for commercial autoclaves. Their adoption may also help increase the accessibility of science to a broader range of investigators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6289433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62894332018-12-28 Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization Swenson, Vaille A. Stacy, Amanda D. Gaylor, Michael O. Ushijima, Blake Philmus, Benjamin Cozy, Loralyn M. Videau, Nina M. Videau, Patrick PLoS One Research Article Laboratory science requires careful maintenance of sterile reagents and tools as well as the sterilization of waste prior to disposal. However, steam autoclaves typically used for this purpose may not be readily accessible to everyone in the scientific community, such as K-12 teachers, researchers in the field, students in under-funded laboratories, or persons in the developing world who lack funding and resources. This work examines the use of commercial electric pressure cookers as an alternative method for the sterilization of media, instruments, and waste. Four commonly available brands of pressure cooker were tested for their ability to sterilize microbiological media, a variety of metal instruments, and high-titer microbial cultures. All four pressure cookers were able to sterilize these starting materials as well as a range of microbial types, including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, filamentous fungi, unicellular fungi, and mixed environmental samples. Only the Instant Pot, however, was able to sterilize autoclave tester ampoules of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores. These results suggest that, depending on the nature of the work undertaken, store-bought pressure cookers can be an appropriate substitute for commercial autoclaves. Their adoption may also help increase the accessibility of science to a broader range of investigators. Public Library of Science 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6289433/ /pubmed/30533061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208769 Text en © 2018 Swenson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Swenson, Vaille A. Stacy, Amanda D. Gaylor, Michael O. Ushijima, Blake Philmus, Benjamin Cozy, Loralyn M. Videau, Nina M. Videau, Patrick Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
title | Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
title_full | Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
title_fullStr | Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
title_short | Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
title_sort | assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6289433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swensonvaillea assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT stacyamandad assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT gaylormichaelo assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT ushijimablake assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT philmusbenjamin assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT cozyloralynm assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT videauninam assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization AT videaupatrick assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization |