Cargando…

Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review

One of the most consistently observed phenomena in autobiographical memory research is the reminiscence bump: a tendency for middle-aged and elderly people to access more personal memories from approximately 10–30 years of age. This systematic review (PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017076695) aimed to synthesiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munawar, Khadeeja, Kuhn, Sara K., Haque, Shamsul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6289446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208595
_version_ 1783379960406212608
author Munawar, Khadeeja
Kuhn, Sara K.
Haque, Shamsul
author_facet Munawar, Khadeeja
Kuhn, Sara K.
Haque, Shamsul
author_sort Munawar, Khadeeja
collection PubMed
description One of the most consistently observed phenomena in autobiographical memory research is the reminiscence bump: a tendency for middle-aged and elderly people to access more personal memories from approximately 10–30 years of age. This systematic review (PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017076695) aimed to synthesize peer-reviewed literature pertaining to the reminiscence bump. The researchers conducted searches in nine databases for studies published between the date of inception of each database and the year 2017. Keywords used included: reminiscence, bump, peak, surge, blip, reminiscence effect, and reminiscence component. Sixty-eight quantitative studies, out of 523, met the inclusion criteria. The researchers implemented a thematic analytic technique for data extraction. Four main themes were generated: methods of memory activation/instruction for life scripts, types of memory/life scripts recalled, location of the reminiscence bump, and theoretical accounts for the bump. The two prevailing methods of memory activation implemented were the cuing method and important memories method. Three types of memories/life scripts were recalled: personal/autobiographical memory, memories for public events, and life script events. The findings illustrate differing temporal periods for the bump: approximately 10–30 years for memories for important events, approximately 5–30 years for memories that were induced by word cues, and 6–39 years for studies using life scripts. In explaining the bump, the narrative/identity account and cultural life script account received the most support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6289446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62894462018-12-28 Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review Munawar, Khadeeja Kuhn, Sara K. Haque, Shamsul PLoS One Research Article One of the most consistently observed phenomena in autobiographical memory research is the reminiscence bump: a tendency for middle-aged and elderly people to access more personal memories from approximately 10–30 years of age. This systematic review (PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017076695) aimed to synthesize peer-reviewed literature pertaining to the reminiscence bump. The researchers conducted searches in nine databases for studies published between the date of inception of each database and the year 2017. Keywords used included: reminiscence, bump, peak, surge, blip, reminiscence effect, and reminiscence component. Sixty-eight quantitative studies, out of 523, met the inclusion criteria. The researchers implemented a thematic analytic technique for data extraction. Four main themes were generated: methods of memory activation/instruction for life scripts, types of memory/life scripts recalled, location of the reminiscence bump, and theoretical accounts for the bump. The two prevailing methods of memory activation implemented were the cuing method and important memories method. Three types of memories/life scripts were recalled: personal/autobiographical memory, memories for public events, and life script events. The findings illustrate differing temporal periods for the bump: approximately 10–30 years for memories for important events, approximately 5–30 years for memories that were induced by word cues, and 6–39 years for studies using life scripts. In explaining the bump, the narrative/identity account and cultural life script account received the most support. Public Library of Science 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6289446/ /pubmed/30533033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208595 Text en © 2018 Munawar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munawar, Khadeeja
Kuhn, Sara K.
Haque, Shamsul
Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review
title Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review
title_full Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review
title_fullStr Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review
title_short Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review
title_sort understanding the reminiscence bump: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6289446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208595
work_keys_str_mv AT munawarkhadeeja understandingthereminiscencebumpasystematicreview
AT kuhnsarak understandingthereminiscencebumpasystematicreview
AT haqueshamsul understandingthereminiscencebumpasystematicreview