Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the chest tube drainage (CTD) and the needle aspiration (NA) in the treatment of primary Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP). METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, seventy patients suffering SP were divided equally into two subgroups, as follows: (A) CTD and (B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramouz, Ali, Lashkari, Mohammad Hossein, Fakour, Sanam, Rasihashemi, Seyed Ziaeddin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559787
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.346.16126
_version_ 1783380041060581376
author Ramouz, Ali
Lashkari, Mohammad Hossein
Fakour, Sanam
Rasihashemi, Seyed Ziaeddin
author_facet Ramouz, Ali
Lashkari, Mohammad Hossein
Fakour, Sanam
Rasihashemi, Seyed Ziaeddin
author_sort Ramouz, Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the chest tube drainage (CTD) and the needle aspiration (NA) in the treatment of primary Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP). METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, seventy patients suffering SP were divided equally into two subgroups, as follows: (A) CTD and (B) NA. The immediate and one-week rate of the treatments was the primary endpoints. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and incidence of pneumothorax recurrence during one-year follow up were also recorded. RESULTS: The immediate success of treatment was 68.5% and 54.2% of patients in CTD and NA groups, respectively that showed no significant difference between study groups (P: 0.16). The complete lung expansion after one week observed in 32 (91.4%) of NA group and 33 (94.2%) patients in CTD group (P: 0.5). Pneumothorax recurrence was detected in 13 patients (4 in NA and 9 in CTD group) (P: 0.11). Mean pain intensity was significantly lower in the NA group at the first hour after the procedure, the first postoperative day and the first week after the intervention (P< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Needle aspiration (NA) can be applied as a first step treatment in patients with primary SP, considering its advantages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6290202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62902022018-12-17 Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax Ramouz, Ali Lashkari, Mohammad Hossein Fakour, Sanam Rasihashemi, Seyed Ziaeddin Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the chest tube drainage (CTD) and the needle aspiration (NA) in the treatment of primary Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP). METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, seventy patients suffering SP were divided equally into two subgroups, as follows: (A) CTD and (B) NA. The immediate and one-week rate of the treatments was the primary endpoints. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and incidence of pneumothorax recurrence during one-year follow up were also recorded. RESULTS: The immediate success of treatment was 68.5% and 54.2% of patients in CTD and NA groups, respectively that showed no significant difference between study groups (P: 0.16). The complete lung expansion after one week observed in 32 (91.4%) of NA group and 33 (94.2%) patients in CTD group (P: 0.5). Pneumothorax recurrence was detected in 13 patients (4 in NA and 9 in CTD group) (P: 0.11). Mean pain intensity was significantly lower in the NA group at the first hour after the procedure, the first postoperative day and the first week after the intervention (P< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Needle aspiration (NA) can be applied as a first step treatment in patients with primary SP, considering its advantages. Professional Medical Publications 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6290202/ /pubmed/30559787 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.346.16126 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramouz, Ali
Lashkari, Mohammad Hossein
Fakour, Sanam
Rasihashemi, Seyed Ziaeddin
Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_full Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_short Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
title_sort randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559787
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.346.16126
work_keys_str_mv AT ramouzali randomizedcontrolledtrialonthecomparisonofchesttubedrainageandneedleaspirationinthetreatmentofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT lashkarimohammadhossein randomizedcontrolledtrialonthecomparisonofchesttubedrainageandneedleaspirationinthetreatmentofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT fakoursanam randomizedcontrolledtrialonthecomparisonofchesttubedrainageandneedleaspirationinthetreatmentofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax
AT rasihashemiseyedziaeddin randomizedcontrolledtrialonthecomparisonofchesttubedrainageandneedleaspirationinthetreatmentofprimaryspontaneouspneumothorax