Cargando…

Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: In patients with breast cancer, HER2 gene expression is of a great importance in reacting to Herceptin treatment. To evaluate this event, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been done routinely on the basis of scoring it and so the patients were divided into 4 groups. Lately, as there have be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atabati, Hadi, Raoofi, Amir, Amini, Abdollah, Farahani, Reza Masteri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.455
_version_ 1783380088052514816
author Atabati, Hadi
Raoofi, Amir
Amini, Abdollah
Farahani, Reza Masteri
author_facet Atabati, Hadi
Raoofi, Amir
Amini, Abdollah
Farahani, Reza Masteri
author_sort Atabati, Hadi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with breast cancer, HER2 gene expression is of a great importance in reacting to Herceptin treatment. To evaluate this event, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been done routinely on the basis of scoring it and so the patients were divided into 4 groups. Lately, as there have been disagreements about how to treat score 2 patients, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are introduced. Since CISH method is more convenient than FISH for gene amplification study, FISH has been substituted by CISH. AIM: The current study is conducted in order to investigate whether using CISH is a better method comparison to IHC method for determines HER2 expression in patients with breast cancer in. METHODS: In this cross-sectional descriptive analytical study, information of 44 female patients with invasive ductal breast cancer were gathered from Imam Reza and Omid Hospital in Mashhad. IHC staining was done for all patients in order to determine the level of HER2 expression, and after scoring them into 4 groups of 0, +1, +2 and +3, CISH staining was carried out for all 4 groups. At the end, results from both methods were statistically evaluated using SPSS software V.22.0. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 50.2 with the standard deviation of 10.96. Using IHC method was observed that 2.6% (1 patient), 26.3% (10 patients), 65.8% (25 patients) and 5.3% (2 patients) percentage of patients had scores of 0, +1, +2 and +3. On the other hand, CISH method showed 36 patients (90%) with no amplifications and 4 (10%) with sever amplifications. In a comparative study using Fisher’s exact test (p = 0.000), we found a significant relation between IHC method and CISH method indicating that all patients showing severe amplifications in CISH method, owned scores of +2 and +3 in IHC method. CONCLUSION: According to the present study and comparing the results with similar previous studies, it can be concluded that CISH method works highly effective in determining HER2 expression level in patients with breast cancer. This method is also able to determine the status of patients with score +2 in IHC for their treatment with herceptin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6290434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62904342018-12-17 Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma Atabati, Hadi Raoofi, Amir Amini, Abdollah Farahani, Reza Masteri Open Access Maced J Med Sci Basic Science BACKGROUND: In patients with breast cancer, HER2 gene expression is of a great importance in reacting to Herceptin treatment. To evaluate this event, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been done routinely on the basis of scoring it and so the patients were divided into 4 groups. Lately, as there have been disagreements about how to treat score 2 patients, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are introduced. Since CISH method is more convenient than FISH for gene amplification study, FISH has been substituted by CISH. AIM: The current study is conducted in order to investigate whether using CISH is a better method comparison to IHC method for determines HER2 expression in patients with breast cancer in. METHODS: In this cross-sectional descriptive analytical study, information of 44 female patients with invasive ductal breast cancer were gathered from Imam Reza and Omid Hospital in Mashhad. IHC staining was done for all patients in order to determine the level of HER2 expression, and after scoring them into 4 groups of 0, +1, +2 and +3, CISH staining was carried out for all 4 groups. At the end, results from both methods were statistically evaluated using SPSS software V.22.0. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 50.2 with the standard deviation of 10.96. Using IHC method was observed that 2.6% (1 patient), 26.3% (10 patients), 65.8% (25 patients) and 5.3% (2 patients) percentage of patients had scores of 0, +1, +2 and +3. On the other hand, CISH method showed 36 patients (90%) with no amplifications and 4 (10%) with sever amplifications. In a comparative study using Fisher’s exact test (p = 0.000), we found a significant relation between IHC method and CISH method indicating that all patients showing severe amplifications in CISH method, owned scores of +2 and +3 in IHC method. CONCLUSION: According to the present study and comparing the results with similar previous studies, it can be concluded that CISH method works highly effective in determining HER2 expression level in patients with breast cancer. This method is also able to determine the status of patients with score +2 in IHC for their treatment with herceptin. Republic of Macedonia 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6290434/ /pubmed/30559846 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.455 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Hadi Atabati, Amir Raoofi, Abdollah Amini, Reza Masteri Farahani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Basic Science
Atabati, Hadi
Raoofi, Amir
Amini, Abdollah
Farahani, Reza Masteri
Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma
title Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma
title_full Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma
title_fullStr Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma
title_short Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Method In Comparison To Immunohistochemistry Method in Breast Carcinoma
title_sort evaluating her2 gene amplification using chromogenic in situ hybridization (cish) method in comparison to immunohistochemistry method in breast carcinoma
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.455
work_keys_str_mv AT atabatihadi evaluatingher2geneamplificationusingchromogenicinsituhybridizationcishmethodincomparisontoimmunohistochemistrymethodinbreastcarcinoma
AT raoofiamir evaluatingher2geneamplificationusingchromogenicinsituhybridizationcishmethodincomparisontoimmunohistochemistrymethodinbreastcarcinoma
AT aminiabdollah evaluatingher2geneamplificationusingchromogenicinsituhybridizationcishmethodincomparisontoimmunohistochemistrymethodinbreastcarcinoma
AT farahanirezamasteri evaluatingher2geneamplificationusingchromogenicinsituhybridizationcishmethodincomparisontoimmunohistochemistrymethodinbreastcarcinoma