Cargando…
The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
BACKGROUND: A quantitative light-induced fluorescence digital (QLF-D) camera is able to assess demineralizations adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Rotations of teeth during and the presence of the orthodontic appliances may influence the longitudinal follow-up of such lesions over time. METHODS: Bra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3 |
_version_ | 1783380103083851776 |
---|---|
author | van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W. Faaij, Maria J. ten Cate, Jacob M. van der Veen, Monique H. |
author_facet | van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W. Faaij, Maria J. ten Cate, Jacob M. van der Veen, Monique H. |
author_sort | van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A quantitative light-induced fluorescence digital (QLF-D) camera is able to assess demineralizations adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Rotations of teeth during and the presence of the orthodontic appliances may influence the longitudinal follow-up of such lesions over time. METHODS: Brackets were bonded on extracted teeth: 54 incisors and 31 canines. Demineralizations were formed in vitro directly cervical of the bracket. Images were captured using a QLF-D camera mounted on an optical bench, equipped with a goniometer on a turntable. The teeth were placed in the goniometer simulating buccolingual rotation (0°, 10°, 20°), the turn-table was used for mesiodistal rotations (0°, 10°, 20°). Standardized QLF-D images were made before (with and without a wire) and after debonding at combinations of aforementioned angles of rotation. The image after debonding at 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation served as a control. RESULTS: The presence of a bracket resulted in a significantly higher fluorescence loss, yet a smaller lesion area (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control. A significant higher fluorescence loss was seen for rotations towards lingual relative to the 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation, while the effect was less explicit towards buccal. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence loss and lesion size are influenced by the angle of rotation under which the demineralization is photographed. The full extent of demineralizations is only apparent after debonding when photographed at rotations of 0° mesiodistal and up to 20° buccal. Precaution must be taken into account assessing demineralizations of patients undergoing treatment with fixed appliances when using a QLF-D camera. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6290521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62905212018-12-17 The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W. Faaij, Maria J. ten Cate, Jacob M. van der Veen, Monique H. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A quantitative light-induced fluorescence digital (QLF-D) camera is able to assess demineralizations adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Rotations of teeth during and the presence of the orthodontic appliances may influence the longitudinal follow-up of such lesions over time. METHODS: Brackets were bonded on extracted teeth: 54 incisors and 31 canines. Demineralizations were formed in vitro directly cervical of the bracket. Images were captured using a QLF-D camera mounted on an optical bench, equipped with a goniometer on a turntable. The teeth were placed in the goniometer simulating buccolingual rotation (0°, 10°, 20°), the turn-table was used for mesiodistal rotations (0°, 10°, 20°). Standardized QLF-D images were made before (with and without a wire) and after debonding at combinations of aforementioned angles of rotation. The image after debonding at 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation served as a control. RESULTS: The presence of a bracket resulted in a significantly higher fluorescence loss, yet a smaller lesion area (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control. A significant higher fluorescence loss was seen for rotations towards lingual relative to the 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation, while the effect was less explicit towards buccal. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence loss and lesion size are influenced by the angle of rotation under which the demineralization is photographed. The full extent of demineralizations is only apparent after debonding when photographed at rotations of 0° mesiodistal and up to 20° buccal. Precaution must be taken into account assessing demineralizations of patients undergoing treatment with fixed appliances when using a QLF-D camera. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6290521/ /pubmed/30538001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W. Faaij, Maria J. ten Cate, Jacob M. van der Veen, Monique H. The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
title | The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
title_full | The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
title_fullStr | The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
title_short | The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
title_sort | reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderkaaijnicolinecw thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT faaijmariaj thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT tencatejacobm thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT vanderveenmoniqueh thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT vanderkaaijnicolinecw reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT faaijmariaj reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT tencatejacobm reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy AT vanderveenmoniqueh reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy |