Cargando…

The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study

BACKGROUND: A quantitative light-induced fluorescence digital (QLF-D) camera is able to assess demineralizations adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Rotations of teeth during and the presence of the orthodontic appliances may influence the longitudinal follow-up of such lesions over time. METHODS: Bra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W., Faaij, Maria J., ten Cate, Jacob M., van der Veen, Monique H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3
_version_ 1783380103083851776
author van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W.
Faaij, Maria J.
ten Cate, Jacob M.
van der Veen, Monique H.
author_facet van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W.
Faaij, Maria J.
ten Cate, Jacob M.
van der Veen, Monique H.
author_sort van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A quantitative light-induced fluorescence digital (QLF-D) camera is able to assess demineralizations adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Rotations of teeth during and the presence of the orthodontic appliances may influence the longitudinal follow-up of such lesions over time. METHODS: Brackets were bonded on extracted teeth: 54 incisors and 31 canines. Demineralizations were formed in vitro directly cervical of the bracket. Images were captured using a QLF-D camera mounted on an optical bench, equipped with a goniometer on a turntable. The teeth were placed in the goniometer simulating buccolingual rotation (0°, 10°, 20°), the turn-table was used for mesiodistal rotations (0°, 10°, 20°). Standardized QLF-D images were made before (with and without a wire) and after debonding at combinations of aforementioned angles of rotation. The image after debonding at 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation served as a control. RESULTS: The presence of a bracket resulted in a significantly higher fluorescence loss, yet a smaller lesion area (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control. A significant higher fluorescence loss was seen for rotations towards lingual relative to the 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation, while the effect was less explicit towards buccal. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence loss and lesion size are influenced by the angle of rotation under which the demineralization is photographed. The full extent of demineralizations is only apparent after debonding when photographed at rotations of 0° mesiodistal and up to 20° buccal. Precaution must be taken into account assessing demineralizations of patients undergoing treatment with fixed appliances when using a QLF-D camera. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6290521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62905212018-12-17 The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W. Faaij, Maria J. ten Cate, Jacob M. van der Veen, Monique H. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A quantitative light-induced fluorescence digital (QLF-D) camera is able to assess demineralizations adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Rotations of teeth during and the presence of the orthodontic appliances may influence the longitudinal follow-up of such lesions over time. METHODS: Brackets were bonded on extracted teeth: 54 incisors and 31 canines. Demineralizations were formed in vitro directly cervical of the bracket. Images were captured using a QLF-D camera mounted on an optical bench, equipped with a goniometer on a turntable. The teeth were placed in the goniometer simulating buccolingual rotation (0°, 10°, 20°), the turn-table was used for mesiodistal rotations (0°, 10°, 20°). Standardized QLF-D images were made before (with and without a wire) and after debonding at combinations of aforementioned angles of rotation. The image after debonding at 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation served as a control. RESULTS: The presence of a bracket resulted in a significantly higher fluorescence loss, yet a smaller lesion area (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control. A significant higher fluorescence loss was seen for rotations towards lingual relative to the 0° buccolingual and 0° mesiodistal rotation, while the effect was less explicit towards buccal. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence loss and lesion size are influenced by the angle of rotation under which the demineralization is photographed. The full extent of demineralizations is only apparent after debonding when photographed at rotations of 0° mesiodistal and up to 20° buccal. Precaution must be taken into account assessing demineralizations of patients undergoing treatment with fixed appliances when using a QLF-D camera. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6290521/ /pubmed/30538001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Kaaij, Nicoline C. W.
Faaij, Maria J.
ten Cate, Jacob M.
van der Veen, Monique H.
The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
title The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
title_full The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
title_fullStr The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
title_short The reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
title_sort reproducibility of assessment of white spot lesions adjacent to orthodontic brackets, with a quantitative light induced fluorescence digital camera at different rotations of teeth – an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0667-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderkaaijnicolinecw thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT faaijmariaj thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT tencatejacobm thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT vanderveenmoniqueh thereproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT vanderkaaijnicolinecw reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT faaijmariaj reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT tencatejacobm reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy
AT vanderveenmoniqueh reproducibilityofassessmentofwhitespotlesionsadjacenttoorthodonticbracketswithaquantitativelightinducedfluorescencedigitalcameraatdifferentrotationsofteethaninvitrostudy