Cargando…
Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper discusses the current issues in the development of foetal charts and is informed by a scoping review of studies constructing charts between 2012 and 2018. RECENT FINDINGS: The scoping review of 20 articles revealed that there is still a lack of consensus on how foetal c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6 |
_version_ | 1783380141450199040 |
---|---|
author | Ohuma, Eric O. Njim, Tsi Sharps, Megan C. |
author_facet | Ohuma, Eric O. Njim, Tsi Sharps, Megan C. |
author_sort | Ohuma, Eric O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper discusses the current issues in the development of foetal charts and is informed by a scoping review of studies constructing charts between 2012 and 2018. RECENT FINDINGS: The scoping review of 20 articles revealed that there is still a lack of consensus on how foetal charts should be constructed and whether an international chart that can be applied across populations is feasible. Many of these charts are in clinical use today and directly affect the identification of at risk newborns that require treatment and nutritional strategies. However, there is no agreement on important design features such as inclusion and exclusion criteria; sample size and agreement on definitions such as what constitutes a healthy population of pregnant women that can be used for constructing foetal standards. SUMMARY: This paper therefore reiterates some of these current issues and the scoping review showcases the heterogeneity in the studies developing foetal charts between 2012 and 2018. There is no consensus on these pertinent issues and hence if not resolved will lead to continued surge of foetal reference and standard charts which will only exacerbate the current problem of not being able to make direct comparisons of foetal size and growth across populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6290707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62907072018-12-27 Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards Ohuma, Eric O. Njim, Tsi Sharps, Megan C. Curr Epidemiol Rep Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (R Platt, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper discusses the current issues in the development of foetal charts and is informed by a scoping review of studies constructing charts between 2012 and 2018. RECENT FINDINGS: The scoping review of 20 articles revealed that there is still a lack of consensus on how foetal charts should be constructed and whether an international chart that can be applied across populations is feasible. Many of these charts are in clinical use today and directly affect the identification of at risk newborns that require treatment and nutritional strategies. However, there is no agreement on important design features such as inclusion and exclusion criteria; sample size and agreement on definitions such as what constitutes a healthy population of pregnant women that can be used for constructing foetal standards. SUMMARY: This paper therefore reiterates some of these current issues and the scoping review showcases the heterogeneity in the studies developing foetal charts between 2012 and 2018. There is no consensus on these pertinent issues and hence if not resolved will lead to continued surge of foetal reference and standard charts which will only exacerbate the current problem of not being able to make direct comparisons of foetal size and growth across populations. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6290707/ /pubmed/30596003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (R Platt, Section Editor) Ohuma, Eric O. Njim, Tsi Sharps, Megan C. Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards |
title | Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards |
title_full | Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards |
title_fullStr | Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards |
title_short | Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards |
title_sort | current issues in the development of foetal growth references and standards |
topic | Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (R Platt, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohumaerico currentissuesinthedevelopmentoffoetalgrowthreferencesandstandards AT njimtsi currentissuesinthedevelopmentoffoetalgrowthreferencesandstandards AT sharpsmeganc currentissuesinthedevelopmentoffoetalgrowthreferencesandstandards |