Cargando…

Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper discusses the current issues in the development of foetal charts and is informed by a scoping review of studies constructing charts between 2012 and 2018. RECENT FINDINGS: The scoping review of 20 articles revealed that there is still a lack of consensus on how foetal c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohuma, Eric O., Njim, Tsi, Sharps, Megan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6
_version_ 1783380141450199040
author Ohuma, Eric O.
Njim, Tsi
Sharps, Megan C.
author_facet Ohuma, Eric O.
Njim, Tsi
Sharps, Megan C.
author_sort Ohuma, Eric O.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper discusses the current issues in the development of foetal charts and is informed by a scoping review of studies constructing charts between 2012 and 2018. RECENT FINDINGS: The scoping review of 20 articles revealed that there is still a lack of consensus on how foetal charts should be constructed and whether an international chart that can be applied across populations is feasible. Many of these charts are in clinical use today and directly affect the identification of at risk newborns that require treatment and nutritional strategies. However, there is no agreement on important design features such as inclusion and exclusion criteria; sample size and agreement on definitions such as what constitutes a healthy population of pregnant women that can be used for constructing foetal standards. SUMMARY: This paper therefore reiterates some of these current issues and the scoping review showcases the heterogeneity in the studies developing foetal charts between 2012 and 2018. There is no consensus on these pertinent issues and hence if not resolved will lead to continued surge of foetal reference and standard charts which will only exacerbate the current problem of not being able to make direct comparisons of foetal size and growth across populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6290707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62907072018-12-27 Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards Ohuma, Eric O. Njim, Tsi Sharps, Megan C. Curr Epidemiol Rep Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (R Platt, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper discusses the current issues in the development of foetal charts and is informed by a scoping review of studies constructing charts between 2012 and 2018. RECENT FINDINGS: The scoping review of 20 articles revealed that there is still a lack of consensus on how foetal charts should be constructed and whether an international chart that can be applied across populations is feasible. Many of these charts are in clinical use today and directly affect the identification of at risk newborns that require treatment and nutritional strategies. However, there is no agreement on important design features such as inclusion and exclusion criteria; sample size and agreement on definitions such as what constitutes a healthy population of pregnant women that can be used for constructing foetal standards. SUMMARY: This paper therefore reiterates some of these current issues and the scoping review showcases the heterogeneity in the studies developing foetal charts between 2012 and 2018. There is no consensus on these pertinent issues and hence if not resolved will lead to continued surge of foetal reference and standard charts which will only exacerbate the current problem of not being able to make direct comparisons of foetal size and growth across populations. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6290707/ /pubmed/30596003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (R Platt, Section Editor)
Ohuma, Eric O.
Njim, Tsi
Sharps, Megan C.
Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
title Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
title_full Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
title_fullStr Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
title_full_unstemmed Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
title_short Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards
title_sort current issues in the development of foetal growth references and standards
topic Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (R Platt, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ohumaerico currentissuesinthedevelopmentoffoetalgrowthreferencesandstandards
AT njimtsi currentissuesinthedevelopmentoffoetalgrowthreferencesandstandards
AT sharpsmeganc currentissuesinthedevelopmentoffoetalgrowthreferencesandstandards