Cargando…

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study

BACKGROUND: The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed cent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadgeel, S, Peters, S, Mok, T, Shaw, A T, Kim, D W, Ou, S I, Pérol, M, Wrona, A, Novello, S, Rosell, R, Zeaiter, A, Liu, T, Nüesch, E, Balas, B, Camidge, D R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30215676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy405
_version_ 1783380173610024960
author Gadgeel, S
Peters, S
Mok, T
Shaw, A T
Kim, D W
Ou, S I
Pérol, M
Wrona, A
Novello, S
Rosell, R
Zeaiter, A
Liu, T
Nüesch, E
Balas, B
Camidge, D R
author_facet Gadgeel, S
Peters, S
Mok, T
Shaw, A T
Kim, D W
Ou, S I
Pérol, M
Wrona, A
Novello, S
Rosell, R
Zeaiter, A
Liu, T
Nüesch, E
Balas, B
Camidge, D R
author_sort Gadgeel, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8 weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n = 64; crizotinib, n = 58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n = 21; crizotinib, n = 22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n = 25; crizotinib, n = 21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25–0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P < 0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not. CONCLUSION: Alectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6290889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62908892018-12-21 Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study Gadgeel, S Peters, S Mok, T Shaw, A T Kim, D W Ou, S I Pérol, M Wrona, A Novello, S Rosell, R Zeaiter, A Liu, T Nüesch, E Balas, B Camidge, D R Ann Oncol Original articles BACKGROUND: The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8 weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n = 64; crizotinib, n = 58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n = 21; crizotinib, n = 22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n = 25; crizotinib, n = 21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25–0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P < 0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not. CONCLUSION: Alectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840 Oxford University Press 2018-11 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6290889/ /pubmed/30215676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy405 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original articles
Gadgeel, S
Peters, S
Mok, T
Shaw, A T
Kim, D W
Ou, S I
Pérol, M
Wrona, A
Novello, S
Rosell, R
Zeaiter, A
Liu, T
Nüesch, E
Balas, B
Camidge, D R
Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
title Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
title_full Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
title_fullStr Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
title_full_unstemmed Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
title_short Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
title_sort alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (alk+) non-small-cell lung cancer: cns efficacy results from the alex study
topic Original articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30215676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy405
work_keys_str_mv AT gadgeels alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT peterss alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT mokt alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT shawat alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT kimdw alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT ousi alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT perolm alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT wronaa alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT novellos alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT rosellr alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT zeaitera alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT liut alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT nuesche alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT balasb alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy
AT camidgedr alectinibversuscrizotinibintreatmentnaiveanaplasticlymphomakinasepositivealknonsmallcelllungcancercnsefficacyresultsfromthealexstudy