Cargando…

Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy

Despite the remarkable progress that has been made to reduce global malaria mortality by 29% in the past 5 years, malaria is still a serious global health problem. Inadequate diagnostics is one of the major obstacles in fighting the disease. An automated system for malaria diagnosis can help to make...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poostchi, Mahdieh, Ersoy, Ilker, McMenamin, Katie, Gordon, Emile, Palaniappan, Nila, Pierce, Susan, Maude, Richard J., Bansal, Abhisheka, Srinivasan, Prakash, Miller, Louis, Palaniappan, Kannappan, Thoma, George, Jaeger, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044506
_version_ 1783380177385947136
author Poostchi, Mahdieh
Ersoy, Ilker
McMenamin, Katie
Gordon, Emile
Palaniappan, Nila
Pierce, Susan
Maude, Richard J.
Bansal, Abhisheka
Srinivasan, Prakash
Miller, Louis
Palaniappan, Kannappan
Thoma, George
Jaeger, Stefan
author_facet Poostchi, Mahdieh
Ersoy, Ilker
McMenamin, Katie
Gordon, Emile
Palaniappan, Nila
Pierce, Susan
Maude, Richard J.
Bansal, Abhisheka
Srinivasan, Prakash
Miller, Louis
Palaniappan, Kannappan
Thoma, George
Jaeger, Stefan
author_sort Poostchi, Mahdieh
collection PubMed
description Despite the remarkable progress that has been made to reduce global malaria mortality by 29% in the past 5 years, malaria is still a serious global health problem. Inadequate diagnostics is one of the major obstacles in fighting the disease. An automated system for malaria diagnosis can help to make malaria screening faster and more reliable. We present an automated system to detect and segment red blood cells (RBCs) and identify infected cells in Wright–Giemsa stained thin blood smears. Specifically, using image analysis and machine learning techniques, we process digital images of thin blood smears to determine the parasitemia in each smear. We use a cell extraction method to segment RBCs, in particular overlapping cells. We show that a combination of RGB color and texture features outperforms other features. We evaluate our method on microscopic blood smear images from human and mouse and show that it outperforms other techniques. For human cells, we measure an absolute error of 1.18% between the true and the automatic parasite counts. For mouse cells, our automatic counts correlate well with expert and flow cytometry counts. This makes our system the first one to work for both human and mouse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6290955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62909552019-12-12 Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy Poostchi, Mahdieh Ersoy, Ilker McMenamin, Katie Gordon, Emile Palaniappan, Nila Pierce, Susan Maude, Richard J. Bansal, Abhisheka Srinivasan, Prakash Miller, Louis Palaniappan, Kannappan Thoma, George Jaeger, Stefan J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Computer-Aided Diagnosis Despite the remarkable progress that has been made to reduce global malaria mortality by 29% in the past 5 years, malaria is still a serious global health problem. Inadequate diagnostics is one of the major obstacles in fighting the disease. An automated system for malaria diagnosis can help to make malaria screening faster and more reliable. We present an automated system to detect and segment red blood cells (RBCs) and identify infected cells in Wright–Giemsa stained thin blood smears. Specifically, using image analysis and machine learning techniques, we process digital images of thin blood smears to determine the parasitemia in each smear. We use a cell extraction method to segment RBCs, in particular overlapping cells. We show that a combination of RGB color and texture features outperforms other features. We evaluate our method on microscopic blood smear images from human and mouse and show that it outperforms other techniques. For human cells, we measure an absolute error of 1.18% between the true and the automatic parasite counts. For mouse cells, our automatic counts correlate well with expert and flow cytometry counts. This makes our system the first one to work for both human and mouse. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018-12-12 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6290955/ /pubmed/30840746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044506 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Poostchi, Mahdieh
Ersoy, Ilker
McMenamin, Katie
Gordon, Emile
Palaniappan, Nila
Pierce, Susan
Maude, Richard J.
Bansal, Abhisheka
Srinivasan, Prakash
Miller, Louis
Palaniappan, Kannappan
Thoma, George
Jaeger, Stefan
Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
title Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
title_full Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
title_fullStr Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
title_short Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
title_sort malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
topic Computer-Aided Diagnosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044506
work_keys_str_mv AT poostchimahdieh malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT ersoyilker malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT mcmenaminkatie malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT gordonemile malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT palaniappannila malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT piercesusan malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT mauderichardj malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT bansalabhisheka malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT srinivasanprakash malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT millerlouis malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT palaniappankannappan malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT thomageorge malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy
AT jaegerstefan malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy