Cargando…
Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy
Despite the remarkable progress that has been made to reduce global malaria mortality by 29% in the past 5 years, malaria is still a serious global health problem. Inadequate diagnostics is one of the major obstacles in fighting the disease. An automated system for malaria diagnosis can help to make...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044506 |
_version_ | 1783380177385947136 |
---|---|
author | Poostchi, Mahdieh Ersoy, Ilker McMenamin, Katie Gordon, Emile Palaniappan, Nila Pierce, Susan Maude, Richard J. Bansal, Abhisheka Srinivasan, Prakash Miller, Louis Palaniappan, Kannappan Thoma, George Jaeger, Stefan |
author_facet | Poostchi, Mahdieh Ersoy, Ilker McMenamin, Katie Gordon, Emile Palaniappan, Nila Pierce, Susan Maude, Richard J. Bansal, Abhisheka Srinivasan, Prakash Miller, Louis Palaniappan, Kannappan Thoma, George Jaeger, Stefan |
author_sort | Poostchi, Mahdieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the remarkable progress that has been made to reduce global malaria mortality by 29% in the past 5 years, malaria is still a serious global health problem. Inadequate diagnostics is one of the major obstacles in fighting the disease. An automated system for malaria diagnosis can help to make malaria screening faster and more reliable. We present an automated system to detect and segment red blood cells (RBCs) and identify infected cells in Wright–Giemsa stained thin blood smears. Specifically, using image analysis and machine learning techniques, we process digital images of thin blood smears to determine the parasitemia in each smear. We use a cell extraction method to segment RBCs, in particular overlapping cells. We show that a combination of RGB color and texture features outperforms other features. We evaluate our method on microscopic blood smear images from human and mouse and show that it outperforms other techniques. For human cells, we measure an absolute error of 1.18% between the true and the automatic parasite counts. For mouse cells, our automatic counts correlate well with expert and flow cytometry counts. This makes our system the first one to work for both human and mouse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6290955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62909552019-12-12 Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy Poostchi, Mahdieh Ersoy, Ilker McMenamin, Katie Gordon, Emile Palaniappan, Nila Pierce, Susan Maude, Richard J. Bansal, Abhisheka Srinivasan, Prakash Miller, Louis Palaniappan, Kannappan Thoma, George Jaeger, Stefan J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Computer-Aided Diagnosis Despite the remarkable progress that has been made to reduce global malaria mortality by 29% in the past 5 years, malaria is still a serious global health problem. Inadequate diagnostics is one of the major obstacles in fighting the disease. An automated system for malaria diagnosis can help to make malaria screening faster and more reliable. We present an automated system to detect and segment red blood cells (RBCs) and identify infected cells in Wright–Giemsa stained thin blood smears. Specifically, using image analysis and machine learning techniques, we process digital images of thin blood smears to determine the parasitemia in each smear. We use a cell extraction method to segment RBCs, in particular overlapping cells. We show that a combination of RGB color and texture features outperforms other features. We evaluate our method on microscopic blood smear images from human and mouse and show that it outperforms other techniques. For human cells, we measure an absolute error of 1.18% between the true and the automatic parasite counts. For mouse cells, our automatic counts correlate well with expert and flow cytometry counts. This makes our system the first one to work for both human and mouse. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018-12-12 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6290955/ /pubmed/30840746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044506 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Computer-Aided Diagnosis Poostchi, Mahdieh Ersoy, Ilker McMenamin, Katie Gordon, Emile Palaniappan, Nila Pierce, Susan Maude, Richard J. Bansal, Abhisheka Srinivasan, Prakash Miller, Louis Palaniappan, Kannappan Thoma, George Jaeger, Stefan Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
title | Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
title_full | Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
title_fullStr | Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
title_short | Malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
title_sort | malaria parasite detection and cell counting for human and mouse using thin blood smear microscopy |
topic | Computer-Aided Diagnosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6290955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poostchimahdieh malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT ersoyilker malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT mcmenaminkatie malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT gordonemile malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT palaniappannila malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT piercesusan malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT mauderichardj malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT bansalabhisheka malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT srinivasanprakash malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT millerlouis malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT palaniappankannappan malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT thomageorge malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy AT jaegerstefan malariaparasitedetectionandcellcountingforhumanandmouseusingthinbloodsmearmicroscopy |