Cargando…

Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube

OBJECTIVES: Montgomery T-tubes enable patients with laryngotracheal stenosis to maintain airway patency. They also restore the ability to phonate in many patients. The primary objective is to compare voice quality of life outcomes in patients before and after Montgomery T-tube placement. The seconda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhillon, Vaninder K, Akst, Lee M, Best, Simon R, Hillel, Alexander T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556048
_version_ 1783380183895506944
author Dhillon, Vaninder K
Akst, Lee M
Best, Simon R
Hillel, Alexander T
author_facet Dhillon, Vaninder K
Akst, Lee M
Best, Simon R
Hillel, Alexander T
author_sort Dhillon, Vaninder K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Montgomery T-tubes enable patients with laryngotracheal stenosis to maintain airway patency. They also restore the ability to phonate in many patients. The primary objective is to compare voice quality of life outcomes in patients before and after Montgomery T-tube placement. The secondary objective is evaluating complications associated with T-tube placement. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with T-tubes for laryngotracheal stenosis from 2012–2016. Patient demographics, Voice-Related Quality of Life (VRQoL) scores, indication for t-tube placement, t-tube duration and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. The most common indication for T- tube placement was grade III–IV stenosis with aphonia/significant dysphonia (n=7, 54%). Other indications were grade III/IV stenosis who desired T-tube over tracheostomy (n=2, 15%), primary glottic stenosis (n=3, 23%), and primary tracheomalacia (n=1, 8%). There was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in VRQoL after T-tube placement. Five patients (38%) went from aphonia to voicing. Granulation tissue was the most common complication related to T tube placement. There were no deaths related to T-tube placement after two years. CONCLUSION: Montgomery T-tubes can restore phonation in a population of patients with iatrogenic high grade stenosis who are aphonic/severely dysphonic with traditional tracheotomies. The complication rate must be considered, with granulation tissue formation the most common.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6291003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62910032018-12-12 Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube Dhillon, Vaninder K Akst, Lee M Best, Simon R Hillel, Alexander T Clin Surg Article OBJECTIVES: Montgomery T-tubes enable patients with laryngotracheal stenosis to maintain airway patency. They also restore the ability to phonate in many patients. The primary objective is to compare voice quality of life outcomes in patients before and after Montgomery T-tube placement. The secondary objective is evaluating complications associated with T-tube placement. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with T-tubes for laryngotracheal stenosis from 2012–2016. Patient demographics, Voice-Related Quality of Life (VRQoL) scores, indication for t-tube placement, t-tube duration and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. The most common indication for T- tube placement was grade III–IV stenosis with aphonia/significant dysphonia (n=7, 54%). Other indications were grade III/IV stenosis who desired T-tube over tracheostomy (n=2, 15%), primary glottic stenosis (n=3, 23%), and primary tracheomalacia (n=1, 8%). There was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in VRQoL after T-tube placement. Five patients (38%) went from aphonia to voicing. Granulation tissue was the most common complication related to T tube placement. There were no deaths related to T-tube placement after two years. CONCLUSION: Montgomery T-tubes can restore phonation in a population of patients with iatrogenic high grade stenosis who are aphonic/severely dysphonic with traditional tracheotomies. The complication rate must be considered, with granulation tissue formation the most common. 2018-01-10 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6291003/ /pubmed/30556048 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Dhillon, Vaninder K
Akst, Lee M
Best, Simon R
Hillel, Alexander T
Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
title Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
title_full Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
title_fullStr Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
title_full_unstemmed Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
title_short Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
title_sort voice outcomes in laryngotracheal stenosis: impact of the montgomery t-tube
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556048
work_keys_str_mv AT dhillonvaninderk voiceoutcomesinlaryngotrachealstenosisimpactofthemontgomeryttube
AT akstleem voiceoutcomesinlaryngotrachealstenosisimpactofthemontgomeryttube
AT bestsimonr voiceoutcomesinlaryngotrachealstenosisimpactofthemontgomeryttube
AT hillelalexandert voiceoutcomesinlaryngotrachealstenosisimpactofthemontgomeryttube