Cargando…
Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363 |
_version_ | 1783380253882712064 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Frank J. H. Gill, Diane L. Yang, Cynthia M. C. Lee, Po-Fu Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Ya-Wen Kuan, Garry |
author_facet | Lu, Frank J. H. Gill, Diane L. Yang, Cynthia M. C. Lee, Po-Fu Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Ya-Wen Kuan, Garry |
author_sort | Lu, Frank J. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reliable and valid instrument to assess AME. In Study 1, a focus group interview established the initial framework of AME. Study 2 used a survey to collect athletes' experiences of AME and develop a scale draft titled “Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES).” In Study 3, we examined the psychometric properties and the underlying structure of AMES via item analysis, internal consistency, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 4, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine AMES's factorial validity; and examined concurrent and discriminant validity by examining correlations with athletes' life stress, positive state of mind, and burnout. In study 5, we examined the measurement invariance of the 6-factor, 18-item AMES with Taiwanese and Malaysian samples. Study 6 examined the predictive validity by comparing AMES scores of successful and unsuccessful martial artists. Across these phases, results showed a 6-factor, 18-item AMES had adequate content validity, factorial structure, nomological validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. We suggest future studies may use AMES to examine its relationships with athletes' cognition, affect, and performance. The application of AMES in sport psychology was also discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6291473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62914732018-12-20 Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation Lu, Frank J. H. Gill, Diane L. Yang, Cynthia M. C. Lee, Po-Fu Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Ya-Wen Kuan, Garry Front Psychol Psychology Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reliable and valid instrument to assess AME. In Study 1, a focus group interview established the initial framework of AME. Study 2 used a survey to collect athletes' experiences of AME and develop a scale draft titled “Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES).” In Study 3, we examined the psychometric properties and the underlying structure of AMES via item analysis, internal consistency, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 4, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine AMES's factorial validity; and examined concurrent and discriminant validity by examining correlations with athletes' life stress, positive state of mind, and burnout. In study 5, we examined the measurement invariance of the 6-factor, 18-item AMES with Taiwanese and Malaysian samples. Study 6 examined the predictive validity by comparing AMES scores of successful and unsuccessful martial artists. Across these phases, results showed a 6-factor, 18-item AMES had adequate content validity, factorial structure, nomological validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. We suggest future studies may use AMES to examine its relationships with athletes' cognition, affect, and performance. The application of AMES in sport psychology was also discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6291473/ /pubmed/30574106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lu, Gill, Yang, Lee, Chiu, Hsu and Kuan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Lu, Frank J. H. Gill, Diane L. Yang, Cynthia M. C. Lee, Po-Fu Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Ya-Wen Kuan, Garry Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation |
title | Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation |
title_full | Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation |
title_fullStr | Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation |
title_short | Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation |
title_sort | measuring athletic mental energy (ame): instrument development and validation |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lufrankjh measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation AT gilldianel measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation AT yangcynthiamc measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation AT leepofu measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation AT chiuyihsiang measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation AT hsuyawen measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation AT kuangarry measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation |