Cargando…

Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation

Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Frank J. H., Gill, Diane L., Yang, Cynthia M. C., Lee, Po-Fu, Chiu, Yi-Hsiang, Hsu, Ya-Wen, Kuan, Garry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363
_version_ 1783380253882712064
author Lu, Frank J. H.
Gill, Diane L.
Yang, Cynthia M. C.
Lee, Po-Fu
Chiu, Yi-Hsiang
Hsu, Ya-Wen
Kuan, Garry
author_facet Lu, Frank J. H.
Gill, Diane L.
Yang, Cynthia M. C.
Lee, Po-Fu
Chiu, Yi-Hsiang
Hsu, Ya-Wen
Kuan, Garry
author_sort Lu, Frank J. H.
collection PubMed
description Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reliable and valid instrument to assess AME. In Study 1, a focus group interview established the initial framework of AME. Study 2 used a survey to collect athletes' experiences of AME and develop a scale draft titled “Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES).” In Study 3, we examined the psychometric properties and the underlying structure of AMES via item analysis, internal consistency, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 4, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine AMES's factorial validity; and examined concurrent and discriminant validity by examining correlations with athletes' life stress, positive state of mind, and burnout. In study 5, we examined the measurement invariance of the 6-factor, 18-item AMES with Taiwanese and Malaysian samples. Study 6 examined the predictive validity by comparing AMES scores of successful and unsuccessful martial artists. Across these phases, results showed a 6-factor, 18-item AMES had adequate content validity, factorial structure, nomological validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. We suggest future studies may use AMES to examine its relationships with athletes' cognition, affect, and performance. The application of AMES in sport psychology was also discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6291473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62914732018-12-20 Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation Lu, Frank J. H. Gill, Diane L. Yang, Cynthia M. C. Lee, Po-Fu Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Ya-Wen Kuan, Garry Front Psychol Psychology Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reliable and valid instrument to assess AME. In Study 1, a focus group interview established the initial framework of AME. Study 2 used a survey to collect athletes' experiences of AME and develop a scale draft titled “Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES).” In Study 3, we examined the psychometric properties and the underlying structure of AMES via item analysis, internal consistency, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 4, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine AMES's factorial validity; and examined concurrent and discriminant validity by examining correlations with athletes' life stress, positive state of mind, and burnout. In study 5, we examined the measurement invariance of the 6-factor, 18-item AMES with Taiwanese and Malaysian samples. Study 6 examined the predictive validity by comparing AMES scores of successful and unsuccessful martial artists. Across these phases, results showed a 6-factor, 18-item AMES had adequate content validity, factorial structure, nomological validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. We suggest future studies may use AMES to examine its relationships with athletes' cognition, affect, and performance. The application of AMES in sport psychology was also discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6291473/ /pubmed/30574106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lu, Gill, Yang, Lee, Chiu, Hsu and Kuan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lu, Frank J. H.
Gill, Diane L.
Yang, Cynthia M. C.
Lee, Po-Fu
Chiu, Yi-Hsiang
Hsu, Ya-Wen
Kuan, Garry
Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
title Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
title_full Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
title_fullStr Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
title_short Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation
title_sort measuring athletic mental energy (ame): instrument development and validation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363
work_keys_str_mv AT lufrankjh measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation
AT gilldianel measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation
AT yangcynthiamc measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation
AT leepofu measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation
AT chiuyihsiang measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation
AT hsuyawen measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation
AT kuangarry measuringathleticmentalenergyameinstrumentdevelopmentandvalidation