Cargando…

Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste

Mineral and organic fertilization can be optimized by using rhizobacteria which increases dry matter, yield, and nutrients in the soil and plant, among the other biological inputs. However, the discovery of single microbes or a consortium that can benefit plants has been a challenge. In this context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Roberta M., Kandasamy, Saveetha, Rigobelo, Everlon Cid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.617
_version_ 1783380291142811648
author Santos, Roberta M.
Kandasamy, Saveetha
Rigobelo, Everlon Cid
author_facet Santos, Roberta M.
Kandasamy, Saveetha
Rigobelo, Everlon Cid
author_sort Santos, Roberta M.
collection PubMed
description Mineral and organic fertilization can be optimized by using rhizobacteria which increases dry matter, yield, and nutrients in the soil and plant, among the other biological inputs. However, the discovery of single microbes or a consortium that can benefit plants has been a challenge. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus combined with mineral fertilization and sugar and alcohol industry by‐products in presprouted and the initial growth phase of sugar cane seedlings. The study was carried out in two phases. Phase 1 included presprouted seedlings with T1 =  untreated control, T2 =  B. subtilis, T3 =  B. pumilus, and T4 =  B. subtilis + B. pumilus treatments. Phase 2 included the same treatments with four types of fertilization: F1 =  mineral fertilization, F2 =  mineral fertilization + vinasse, F3 =  mineral fertilization + filter cake, and F4 =  mineral fertilization + filter cake compost. Of the phase 1 treatments, T2 (B. subtilis) was the best promoter of root growth and the total dry matter compared to the control with an increase of 23.0% compared to the control. In phase 2, B. pumilus application, increased the total dry matter by 13%, the number of tillers by 37%, and the diameter of the tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization. The combined application of B. subtilis and B. pumilus increased the phosphorus content by 13% in soil treated with mineral fertilization and filter cake compost. The results of the this study strongly suggest that the use of B. subtilis and B. pumilus together with these by‐products can improve soil fertility parameters and decrease adverse effects associated with vinasse fertilization, in addition to providing shoot and root growth and providing collective synergy for a high yield of sugarcane production with environmental benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6291826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62918262018-12-18 Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste Santos, Roberta M. Kandasamy, Saveetha Rigobelo, Everlon Cid Microbiologyopen Original Articles Mineral and organic fertilization can be optimized by using rhizobacteria which increases dry matter, yield, and nutrients in the soil and plant, among the other biological inputs. However, the discovery of single microbes or a consortium that can benefit plants has been a challenge. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus combined with mineral fertilization and sugar and alcohol industry by‐products in presprouted and the initial growth phase of sugar cane seedlings. The study was carried out in two phases. Phase 1 included presprouted seedlings with T1 =  untreated control, T2 =  B. subtilis, T3 =  B. pumilus, and T4 =  B. subtilis + B. pumilus treatments. Phase 2 included the same treatments with four types of fertilization: F1 =  mineral fertilization, F2 =  mineral fertilization + vinasse, F3 =  mineral fertilization + filter cake, and F4 =  mineral fertilization + filter cake compost. Of the phase 1 treatments, T2 (B. subtilis) was the best promoter of root growth and the total dry matter compared to the control with an increase of 23.0% compared to the control. In phase 2, B. pumilus application, increased the total dry matter by 13%, the number of tillers by 37%, and the diameter of the tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization. The combined application of B. subtilis and B. pumilus increased the phosphorus content by 13% in soil treated with mineral fertilization and filter cake compost. The results of the this study strongly suggest that the use of B. subtilis and B. pumilus together with these by‐products can improve soil fertility parameters and decrease adverse effects associated with vinasse fertilization, in addition to providing shoot and root growth and providing collective synergy for a high yield of sugarcane production with environmental benefits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6291826/ /pubmed/29653035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.617 Text en © 2018 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Santos, Roberta M.
Kandasamy, Saveetha
Rigobelo, Everlon Cid
Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste
title Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste
title_full Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste
title_fullStr Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste
title_full_unstemmed Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste
title_short Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste
title_sort sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of pgpr and cane waste
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.617
work_keys_str_mv AT santosrobertam sugarcanegrowthandnutritionlevelsaredifferentiallyaffectedbytheapplicationofpgprandcanewaste
AT kandasamysaveetha sugarcanegrowthandnutritionlevelsaredifferentiallyaffectedbytheapplicationofpgprandcanewaste
AT rigobeloeverloncid sugarcanegrowthandnutritionlevelsaredifferentiallyaffectedbytheapplicationofpgprandcanewaste