Cargando…

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: Delayed bowel function recovery and postoperative ileus are relatively serious complications of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Our study aimed to determine whether performing pelvic re-peritonealization reduces the incidence of these complications. METHODS: Clinical data of 78 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Qiang, Li, Pengchao, Yang, Xiao, Qian, Jian, Wang, Zengjun, Lu, Qiang, Gu, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0424-6
_version_ 1783380313374720000
author Cao, Qiang
Li, Pengchao
Yang, Xiao
Qian, Jian
Wang, Zengjun
Lu, Qiang
Gu, Min
author_facet Cao, Qiang
Li, Pengchao
Yang, Xiao
Qian, Jian
Wang, Zengjun
Lu, Qiang
Gu, Min
author_sort Cao, Qiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed bowel function recovery and postoperative ileus are relatively serious complications of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Our study aimed to determine whether performing pelvic re-peritonealization reduces the incidence of these complications. METHODS: Clinical data of 78 patients who had undergone LRC with pelvic re-peritonealization from August 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected and compared with those of 92 patients who had undergone LRC alone between January 2013 and July 2015 in our institution. Differences in duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, time to recovery of bowel function, the complications of intestinal and blood vessel injury, and incidence of postoperative ileus between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics such as age, sex and BMI were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in duration of surgery (P = 0.072), estimated blood loss (P = 0.717), or incidence of intestinal obstruction (P = 0.225) between the two groups. Interestingly, patients who had undergone pelvic re-peritonealization recovered bowel function more rapidly than those had not (2.79 d vs. 3.72 d, P = 0.001). Additionally, hospitalization stay was significantly shorter for patients with re-peritonealization than for those without (5.46 d vs. 6.68 d, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LRC alone, LRC with pelvic re-peritonealization as described in the present study had comparable perioperative complications, but was associated with more rapid gastrointestinal recovery and shorter hospitalization stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6291951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62919512018-12-17 Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes Cao, Qiang Li, Pengchao Yang, Xiao Qian, Jian Wang, Zengjun Lu, Qiang Gu, Min BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Delayed bowel function recovery and postoperative ileus are relatively serious complications of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Our study aimed to determine whether performing pelvic re-peritonealization reduces the incidence of these complications. METHODS: Clinical data of 78 patients who had undergone LRC with pelvic re-peritonealization from August 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected and compared with those of 92 patients who had undergone LRC alone between January 2013 and July 2015 in our institution. Differences in duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, time to recovery of bowel function, the complications of intestinal and blood vessel injury, and incidence of postoperative ileus between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics such as age, sex and BMI were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in duration of surgery (P = 0.072), estimated blood loss (P = 0.717), or incidence of intestinal obstruction (P = 0.225) between the two groups. Interestingly, patients who had undergone pelvic re-peritonealization recovered bowel function more rapidly than those had not (2.79 d vs. 3.72 d, P = 0.001). Additionally, hospitalization stay was significantly shorter for patients with re-peritonealization than for those without (5.46 d vs. 6.68 d, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LRC alone, LRC with pelvic re-peritonealization as described in the present study had comparable perioperative complications, but was associated with more rapid gastrointestinal recovery and shorter hospitalization stay. BioMed Central 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6291951/ /pubmed/30541538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0424-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cao, Qiang
Li, Pengchao
Yang, Xiao
Qian, Jian
Wang, Zengjun
Lu, Qiang
Gu, Min
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
title Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
title_full Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
title_short Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
title_sort laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0424-6
work_keys_str_mv AT caoqiang laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes
AT lipengchao laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes
AT yangxiao laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes
AT qianjian laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes
AT wangzengjun laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes
AT luqiang laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes
AT gumin laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithpelvicreperitonealizationthetechniqueandinitialclinicaloutcomes