Cargando…

Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio

INTRODUCTION: Poverty is associated with higher cancer rates, cancer risk factors such as tobacco use and obesity, and lack of access to cancer screening and treatment. This analysis examined differences in cancer outcomes and associated factors among the poorest counties and the most affluent count...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kollman, John, Sobotka, Holly L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30522581
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180332
_version_ 1783380358371213312
author Kollman, John
Sobotka, Holly L.
author_facet Kollman, John
Sobotka, Holly L.
author_sort Kollman, John
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Poverty is associated with higher cancer rates, cancer risk factors such as tobacco use and obesity, and lack of access to cancer screening and treatment. This analysis examined differences in cancer outcomes and associated factors among the poorest counties and the most affluent counties in Ohio. METHODS: We compared cancer incidence and mortality rates and prevalence of selected cancer risk factors between the 12 poorest counties in Ohio and the 10 most affluent counties in Ohio from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015. We also compared stage at diagnosis of selected cancers and the health insurance and treatment status of people with cancer. RESULTS: The mortality rate for all cancers combined was 19% higher in the poorest counties (192.2 per 100,000) than in the most affluent counties (161.9 per 100,000). Cervical cancer and other smoking-related cancers had higher rates in the poorest counties, where they were more likely to be diagnosed at a late stage. The prevalence was significantly higher in Ohio’s poorest counties for current tobacco smoking (25.6% vs 17.1%), obesity (32.7% vs 28.3%), and physical inactivity (29.7% vs 23.0%). Among people with cancer, a smaller percentage had private health insurance (42.9% vs 33.0%) and a greater percentage had no treatment (8.9% vs 10.4%) in the poorest counties. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates disparities in cancer incidence, mortality, and stage, and differences in cancer risk factors, health insurance, and treatment status between Ohio’s poorest and most affluent counties. This information may help to target public health interventions for the prevention, early detection, and control of cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6292140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62921402019-01-03 Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio Kollman, John Sobotka, Holly L. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Poverty is associated with higher cancer rates, cancer risk factors such as tobacco use and obesity, and lack of access to cancer screening and treatment. This analysis examined differences in cancer outcomes and associated factors among the poorest counties and the most affluent counties in Ohio. METHODS: We compared cancer incidence and mortality rates and prevalence of selected cancer risk factors between the 12 poorest counties in Ohio and the 10 most affluent counties in Ohio from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015. We also compared stage at diagnosis of selected cancers and the health insurance and treatment status of people with cancer. RESULTS: The mortality rate for all cancers combined was 19% higher in the poorest counties (192.2 per 100,000) than in the most affluent counties (161.9 per 100,000). Cervical cancer and other smoking-related cancers had higher rates in the poorest counties, where they were more likely to be diagnosed at a late stage. The prevalence was significantly higher in Ohio’s poorest counties for current tobacco smoking (25.6% vs 17.1%), obesity (32.7% vs 28.3%), and physical inactivity (29.7% vs 23.0%). Among people with cancer, a smaller percentage had private health insurance (42.9% vs 33.0%) and a greater percentage had no treatment (8.9% vs 10.4%) in the poorest counties. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates disparities in cancer incidence, mortality, and stage, and differences in cancer risk factors, health insurance, and treatment status between Ohio’s poorest and most affluent counties. This information may help to target public health interventions for the prevention, early detection, and control of cancer. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6292140/ /pubmed/30522581 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180332 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kollman, John
Sobotka, Holly L.
Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio
title Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio
title_full Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio
title_fullStr Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio
title_full_unstemmed Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio
title_short Poverty and Cancer Disparities in Ohio
title_sort poverty and cancer disparities in ohio
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30522581
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180332
work_keys_str_mv AT kollmanjohn povertyandcancerdisparitiesinohio
AT sobotkahollyl povertyandcancerdisparitiesinohio