Cargando…

Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)

BACKGROUND: Successful response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex requires continued maintenance treatments. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) may provide a more convenient alternative. METHODS: This pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Neill, Francis, Sacco, Paul, Bowden, Eleanor, Asher, Rebecca, Burnside, Girvan, Cox, Trevor, Nurmikko, Turo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573988
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186079
_version_ 1783380392334589952
author O’Neill, Francis
Sacco, Paul
Bowden, Eleanor
Asher, Rebecca
Burnside, Girvan
Cox, Trevor
Nurmikko, Turo
author_facet O’Neill, Francis
Sacco, Paul
Bowden, Eleanor
Asher, Rebecca
Burnside, Girvan
Cox, Trevor
Nurmikko, Turo
author_sort O’Neill, Francis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex requires continued maintenance treatments. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) may provide a more convenient alternative. METHODS: This pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of a randomized, double-blind, double-crossover pilot study for patients to self-administer tDCS motor cortex stimulation for 20 minutes/day over five consecutive days. Primary outcomes were as follows: usability of patient-administered tDCS, compliance with device, recruitment, and retention rates. Secondary outcomes were as follows: effect on overall pain levels and quality of life via Short Form-36 anxiety and depression via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini-Mental State scores. RESULTS: A total of 24 subjects with neuropathic pain, who had previously experienced rTMS motor cortex stimulation (13 with reduction in pain scores, 11 nonresponders) were recruited at the Pain Research Institute, Fazakerley, UK. A total of 21 subjects completed the study. Recruitment rate was 100% but retention rate was only 87.5%. All patients reported satisfactory usability of the tDCS device. No significant difference was shown between Sham vs Anodal (−0.16, 95% CI: −0.43 to 0.11) P=0.43, Sham vs Cathodal (0.11, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.37) P=0.94, or Cathodal vs Anodal (−0.27, 95% CI: −0.54 to 0.00) P=0.053 treatments. Furthermore, no significant changes were demonstrated in anxiety, depression, or quality of life measurements. The data collected to estimate sample size for a definitive study suggested that the study’s sample size was already large enough to detect a change of 15% in pain levels at 90% power for the overall group of 21 patients. CONCLUSION: This study did not show a beneficial effect of tDCS in this group of patients and does not support the need for a larger definitive study using the same experimental paradigm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56839387
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6292397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62923972018-12-20 Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study) O’Neill, Francis Sacco, Paul Bowden, Eleanor Asher, Rebecca Burnside, Girvan Cox, Trevor Nurmikko, Turo J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Successful response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex requires continued maintenance treatments. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) may provide a more convenient alternative. METHODS: This pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of a randomized, double-blind, double-crossover pilot study for patients to self-administer tDCS motor cortex stimulation for 20 minutes/day over five consecutive days. Primary outcomes were as follows: usability of patient-administered tDCS, compliance with device, recruitment, and retention rates. Secondary outcomes were as follows: effect on overall pain levels and quality of life via Short Form-36 anxiety and depression via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini-Mental State scores. RESULTS: A total of 24 subjects with neuropathic pain, who had previously experienced rTMS motor cortex stimulation (13 with reduction in pain scores, 11 nonresponders) were recruited at the Pain Research Institute, Fazakerley, UK. A total of 21 subjects completed the study. Recruitment rate was 100% but retention rate was only 87.5%. All patients reported satisfactory usability of the tDCS device. No significant difference was shown between Sham vs Anodal (−0.16, 95% CI: −0.43 to 0.11) P=0.43, Sham vs Cathodal (0.11, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.37) P=0.94, or Cathodal vs Anodal (−0.27, 95% CI: −0.54 to 0.00) P=0.053 treatments. Furthermore, no significant changes were demonstrated in anxiety, depression, or quality of life measurements. The data collected to estimate sample size for a definitive study suggested that the study’s sample size was already large enough to detect a change of 15% in pain levels at 90% power for the overall group of 21 patients. CONCLUSION: This study did not show a beneficial effect of tDCS in this group of patients and does not support the need for a larger definitive study using the same experimental paradigm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56839387 Dove Medical Press 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6292397/ /pubmed/30573988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186079 Text en © 2018 O’Neill et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
O’Neill, Francis
Sacco, Paul
Bowden, Eleanor
Asher, Rebecca
Burnside, Girvan
Cox, Trevor
Nurmikko, Turo
Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)
title Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)
title_full Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)
title_fullStr Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)
title_full_unstemmed Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)
title_short Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study)
title_sort patient-delivered tdcs on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to tms (a randomized controlled pilot study)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573988
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186079
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillfrancis patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT saccopaul patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT bowdeneleanor patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT asherrebecca patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT burnsidegirvan patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT coxtrevor patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT nurmikkoturo patientdeliveredtdcsonchronicneuropathicpaininpriorresponderstotmsarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy