Cargando…

Religiosity and health: A global comparative study

The objective of this paper is to understand global connections between indicators of religiosity and health and how these differ cross-nationally. Data are from World Values Surveys (93 countries, N=121,770). Health is based on a self-assessed question about overall health. First, country-specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmer, Zachary, Rojo, Florencia, Ofstedal, Mary Beth, Chiu, Chi-Tsun, Saito, Yasuhiko, Jagger, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293091/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.11.006
_version_ 1783380491449139200
author Zimmer, Zachary
Rojo, Florencia
Ofstedal, Mary Beth
Chiu, Chi-Tsun
Saito, Yasuhiko
Jagger, Carol
author_facet Zimmer, Zachary
Rojo, Florencia
Ofstedal, Mary Beth
Chiu, Chi-Tsun
Saito, Yasuhiko
Jagger, Carol
author_sort Zimmer, Zachary
collection PubMed
description The objective of this paper is to understand global connections between indicators of religiosity and health and how these differ cross-nationally. Data are from World Values Surveys (93 countries, N=121,770). Health is based on a self-assessed question about overall health. First, country-specific regressions are examined to determine the association separately in each country. Next, country-level variables and cross-level interactions are added to multilevel models to assess whether and how context affects health and religiosity slopes. Results indicate enormous variation in associations between religiosity and health across countries and religiosity indicators. Significant positive associations between all religiosity measures and health exist in only three countries (Georgia, South Africa, and USA); negative associations in only two (Slovenia and Tunisia). Macro-level variables explain some of this divergence. Greater participation in religious activity relates to better health in countries characterized as being religiously diverse. The importance in god and pondering life’s meaning is more likely associated with better health in countries with low levels of the Human Development Index. Pondering life’s meaning more likely associates with better health in countries that place more stringent restrictions on religious practice. Religiosity is less likely to be related to good health in communist and former communist countries of Asia and Eastern Europe. In conclusion, the association between religiosity and health is complex, being partly shaped by geopolitical and macro psychosocial contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62930912018-12-21 Religiosity and health: A global comparative study Zimmer, Zachary Rojo, Florencia Ofstedal, Mary Beth Chiu, Chi-Tsun Saito, Yasuhiko Jagger, Carol SSM Popul Health Article The objective of this paper is to understand global connections between indicators of religiosity and health and how these differ cross-nationally. Data are from World Values Surveys (93 countries, N=121,770). Health is based on a self-assessed question about overall health. First, country-specific regressions are examined to determine the association separately in each country. Next, country-level variables and cross-level interactions are added to multilevel models to assess whether and how context affects health and religiosity slopes. Results indicate enormous variation in associations between religiosity and health across countries and religiosity indicators. Significant positive associations between all religiosity measures and health exist in only three countries (Georgia, South Africa, and USA); negative associations in only two (Slovenia and Tunisia). Macro-level variables explain some of this divergence. Greater participation in religious activity relates to better health in countries characterized as being religiously diverse. The importance in god and pondering life’s meaning is more likely associated with better health in countries with low levels of the Human Development Index. Pondering life’s meaning more likely associates with better health in countries that place more stringent restrictions on religious practice. Religiosity is less likely to be related to good health in communist and former communist countries of Asia and Eastern Europe. In conclusion, the association between religiosity and health is complex, being partly shaped by geopolitical and macro psychosocial contexts. Elsevier 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6293091/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.11.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zimmer, Zachary
Rojo, Florencia
Ofstedal, Mary Beth
Chiu, Chi-Tsun
Saito, Yasuhiko
Jagger, Carol
Religiosity and health: A global comparative study
title Religiosity and health: A global comparative study
title_full Religiosity and health: A global comparative study
title_fullStr Religiosity and health: A global comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Religiosity and health: A global comparative study
title_short Religiosity and health: A global comparative study
title_sort religiosity and health: a global comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293091/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.11.006
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmerzachary religiosityandhealthaglobalcomparativestudy
AT rojoflorencia religiosityandhealthaglobalcomparativestudy
AT ofstedalmarybeth religiosityandhealthaglobalcomparativestudy
AT chiuchitsun religiosityandhealthaglobalcomparativestudy
AT saitoyasuhiko religiosityandhealthaglobalcomparativestudy
AT jaggercarol religiosityandhealthaglobalcomparativestudy