Cargando…

Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with stand-alone tricortical iliac crest autograft versus stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in cases of cer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Ayush, Kishore, Hari, Singh, Vijay, Shawky Abdelgawaad, Ahmed, Sinha, Shorabh, Kamble, Prashant Chandrakant, Jorule, Kailash, Agrawal, Romit, Mathapati, Sumit, Deepak, Priyank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780345
_version_ 1783380532296417280
author Sharma, Ayush
Kishore, Hari
Singh, Vijay
Shawky Abdelgawaad, Ahmed
Sinha, Shorabh
Kamble, Prashant Chandrakant
Jorule, Kailash
Agrawal, Romit
Mathapati, Sumit
Deepak, Priyank
author_facet Sharma, Ayush
Kishore, Hari
Singh, Vijay
Shawky Abdelgawaad, Ahmed
Sinha, Shorabh
Kamble, Prashant Chandrakant
Jorule, Kailash
Agrawal, Romit
Mathapati, Sumit
Deepak, Priyank
author_sort Sharma, Ayush
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with stand-alone tricortical iliac crest autograft versus stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 60 patients in each group were compared. RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement noted in postoperative Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (MJOA) follow-up scores with comparison pairs of preoperative versus 6 months, preoperative versus 1 year, and 3 months versus 6 months, 3 months versus 1 year in both groups. But improvements in MJOA scores were statistically insignificant between 6 months and 1 year (P = .0639) for the autograft group when compared with PEEK cage group (P = 0001). The mean loss of segmental lordosis on follow-up X-ray for the autograft group was (5.89 ± 2.90°), which was significantly higher (1.88 ± 2.77°) than the mean loss seen in the PEEK cage group (P = .01). This was most evident between 6 months and 1 year, resulting in plateauing of the improvement in MJOA score between 6 months to 1 year in the autograft group. While there was no statistical difference between fusion rates between the groups for 1 and 2 levels of ACDF, overall fusion rates were significantly better for 1-level ACDF (95.74%) when compared with 2-level ACDF (76.00%). CONCLUSION: ACDF with PEEK cage is the fusion technique of choice for cervical fusion with fewer complications and better functional recovery in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62934262018-12-17 Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Sharma, Ayush Kishore, Hari Singh, Vijay Shawky Abdelgawaad, Ahmed Sinha, Shorabh Kamble, Prashant Chandrakant Jorule, Kailash Agrawal, Romit Mathapati, Sumit Deepak, Priyank Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with stand-alone tricortical iliac crest autograft versus stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 60 patients in each group were compared. RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement noted in postoperative Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (MJOA) follow-up scores with comparison pairs of preoperative versus 6 months, preoperative versus 1 year, and 3 months versus 6 months, 3 months versus 1 year in both groups. But improvements in MJOA scores were statistically insignificant between 6 months and 1 year (P = .0639) for the autograft group when compared with PEEK cage group (P = 0001). The mean loss of segmental lordosis on follow-up X-ray for the autograft group was (5.89 ± 2.90°), which was significantly higher (1.88 ± 2.77°) than the mean loss seen in the PEEK cage group (P = .01). This was most evident between 6 months and 1 year, resulting in plateauing of the improvement in MJOA score between 6 months to 1 year in the autograft group. While there was no statistical difference between fusion rates between the groups for 1 and 2 levels of ACDF, overall fusion rates were significantly better for 1-level ACDF (95.74%) when compared with 2-level ACDF (76.00%). CONCLUSION: ACDF with PEEK cage is the fusion technique of choice for cervical fusion with fewer complications and better functional recovery in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. SAGE Publications 2018-06-12 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6293426/ /pubmed/30560039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780345 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sharma, Ayush
Kishore, Hari
Singh, Vijay
Shawky Abdelgawaad, Ahmed
Sinha, Shorabh
Kamble, Prashant Chandrakant
Jorule, Kailash
Agrawal, Romit
Mathapati, Sumit
Deepak, Priyank
Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
title Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
title_full Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
title_short Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
title_sort comparative study of functional outcome of anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion with tricortical stand-alone iliac crest autograft versus stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780345
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaayush comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT kishorehari comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT singhvijay comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT shawkyabdelgawaadahmed comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT sinhashorabh comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT kambleprashantchandrakant comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT jorulekailash comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT agrawalromit comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT mathapatisumit comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT deepakpriyank comparativestudyoffunctionaloutcomeofanteriorcervicaldecompressionandinterbodyfusionwithtricorticalstandaloneiliaccrestautograftversusstandalonepolyetheretherketonecageincervicalspondyloticmyelopathy