Cargando…

On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects

This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soranzo, Alessandro, Petrelli, Daniela, Ciolfi, Luigina, Reidy, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817749228
_version_ 1783380539245330432
author Soranzo, Alessandro
Petrelli, Daniela
Ciolfi, Luigina
Reidy, John
author_facet Soranzo, Alessandro
Petrelli, Daniela
Ciolfi, Luigina
Reidy, John
author_sort Soranzo, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in compound stimulation; second, to explore whether there exists aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ behaviours; and, finally, to test whether there exists aesthetic preference for specific combinations of objects’ structures and behaviours. The following variables were systematically manipulated: (a) IOs’ contour (rounded vs angular), (b) IOs’ size (small vs large), (c) IOs’ surface texture (rough vs smooth), and (d) IOs’ behaviour (lighting, sounding, vibrating, and quiescent). Results show that behaviour was the dominant factor: it influenced aesthetics more than any other characteristic; vibrating IOs were preferred over lighting and sounding IOs, supporting the importance of haptic processing in aesthetics. Results did not confirm the size and smoothness effects previously reported in vision and touch, respectively, which suggests that the aesthetic preference that emerges in isolated conditions may be different in compound stimulation. Results corroborate the smooth curvature effect. We suggest that behavior may be an aesthetic primitive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62934552018-12-26 On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects Soranzo, Alessandro Petrelli, Daniela Ciolfi, Luigina Reidy, John Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in compound stimulation; second, to explore whether there exists aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ behaviours; and, finally, to test whether there exists aesthetic preference for specific combinations of objects’ structures and behaviours. The following variables were systematically manipulated: (a) IOs’ contour (rounded vs angular), (b) IOs’ size (small vs large), (c) IOs’ surface texture (rough vs smooth), and (d) IOs’ behaviour (lighting, sounding, vibrating, and quiescent). Results show that behaviour was the dominant factor: it influenced aesthetics more than any other characteristic; vibrating IOs were preferred over lighting and sounding IOs, supporting the importance of haptic processing in aesthetics. Results did not confirm the size and smoothness effects previously reported in vision and touch, respectively, which suggests that the aesthetic preference that emerges in isolated conditions may be different in compound stimulation. Results corroborate the smooth curvature effect. We suggest that behavior may be an aesthetic primitive. SAGE Publications 2018-01-24 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6293455/ /pubmed/29364061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817749228 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Soranzo, Alessandro
Petrelli, Daniela
Ciolfi, Luigina
Reidy, John
On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
title On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
title_full On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
title_fullStr On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
title_full_unstemmed On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
title_short On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
title_sort on the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817749228
work_keys_str_mv AT soranzoalessandro ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects
AT petrellidaniela ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects
AT ciolfiluigina ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects
AT reidyjohn ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects