Cargando…
On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects
This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in com...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817749228 |
_version_ | 1783380539245330432 |
---|---|
author | Soranzo, Alessandro Petrelli, Daniela Ciolfi, Luigina Reidy, John |
author_facet | Soranzo, Alessandro Petrelli, Daniela Ciolfi, Luigina Reidy, John |
author_sort | Soranzo, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in compound stimulation; second, to explore whether there exists aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ behaviours; and, finally, to test whether there exists aesthetic preference for specific combinations of objects’ structures and behaviours. The following variables were systematically manipulated: (a) IOs’ contour (rounded vs angular), (b) IOs’ size (small vs large), (c) IOs’ surface texture (rough vs smooth), and (d) IOs’ behaviour (lighting, sounding, vibrating, and quiescent). Results show that behaviour was the dominant factor: it influenced aesthetics more than any other characteristic; vibrating IOs were preferred over lighting and sounding IOs, supporting the importance of haptic processing in aesthetics. Results did not confirm the size and smoothness effects previously reported in vision and touch, respectively, which suggests that the aesthetic preference that emerges in isolated conditions may be different in compound stimulation. Results corroborate the smooth curvature effect. We suggest that behavior may be an aesthetic primitive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6293455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62934552018-12-26 On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects Soranzo, Alessandro Petrelli, Daniela Ciolfi, Luigina Reidy, John Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles This study examined the aesthetics of interactive objects (IOs), which are three-dimensional physical artefacts that exhibit autonomous behaviour when handled. The aim of the research was threefold: first, to investigate whether aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ structures emerges in compound stimulation; second, to explore whether there exists aesthetic preference for distinctive objects’ behaviours; and, finally, to test whether there exists aesthetic preference for specific combinations of objects’ structures and behaviours. The following variables were systematically manipulated: (a) IOs’ contour (rounded vs angular), (b) IOs’ size (small vs large), (c) IOs’ surface texture (rough vs smooth), and (d) IOs’ behaviour (lighting, sounding, vibrating, and quiescent). Results show that behaviour was the dominant factor: it influenced aesthetics more than any other characteristic; vibrating IOs were preferred over lighting and sounding IOs, supporting the importance of haptic processing in aesthetics. Results did not confirm the size and smoothness effects previously reported in vision and touch, respectively, which suggests that the aesthetic preference that emerges in isolated conditions may be different in compound stimulation. Results corroborate the smooth curvature effect. We suggest that behavior may be an aesthetic primitive. SAGE Publications 2018-01-24 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6293455/ /pubmed/29364061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817749228 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Soranzo, Alessandro Petrelli, Daniela Ciolfi, Luigina Reidy, John On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
title | On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
title_full | On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
title_fullStr | On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
title_full_unstemmed | On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
title_short | On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
title_sort | on the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817749228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soranzoalessandro ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects AT petrellidaniela ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects AT ciolfiluigina ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects AT reidyjohn ontheperceptualaestheticsofinteractiveobjects |