Cargando…

The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm

BACKGROUND: The standard genetic code (SGC) is a unique set of rules which assign amino acids to codons. Similar amino acids tend to have similar codons indicating that the code evolved to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements in proteins, caused by mutations or translational errors. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wnętrzak, Małgorzata, Błażej, Paweł, Mackiewicz, Dorota, Mackiewicz, Paweł
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30545289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1304-0
_version_ 1783380559890743296
author Wnętrzak, Małgorzata
Błażej, Paweł
Mackiewicz, Dorota
Mackiewicz, Paweł
author_facet Wnętrzak, Małgorzata
Błażej, Paweł
Mackiewicz, Dorota
Mackiewicz, Paweł
author_sort Wnętrzak, Małgorzata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard genetic code (SGC) is a unique set of rules which assign amino acids to codons. Similar amino acids tend to have similar codons indicating that the code evolved to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements in proteins, caused by mutations or translational errors. However, if such optimization in fact occurred, many different properties of amino acids must have been taken into account during the code evolution. Therefore, this problem can be reformulated as a multi-objective optimization task, in which the selection constraints are represented by measures based on various amino acid properties. RESULTS: To study the optimality of the SGC we applied a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and we used the representatives of eight clusters, which grouped over 500 indices describing various physicochemical properties of amino acids. Thanks to that we avoided an arbitrary choice of amino acid features as optimization criteria. As a consequence, we were able to conduct a more general study on the properties of the SGC than the ones presented so far in other papers on this topic. We considered two models of the genetic code, one preserving the characteristic codon blocks structure of the SGC and the other without this restriction. The results revealed that the SGC could be significantly improved in terms of error minimization, hereby it is not fully optimized. Its structure differs significantly from the structure of the codes optimized to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements. On the other hand, using newly defined quality measures that placed the SGC in the global space of theoretical genetic codes, we showed that the SGC is definitely closer to the codes that minimize the costs of amino acids replacements than those maximizing them. CONCLUSIONS: The standard genetic code represents most likely only partially optimized systems, which emerged under the influence of many different factors. Our findings can be useful to researchers involved in modifying the genetic code of the living organisms and designing artificial ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62935582018-12-18 The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm Wnętrzak, Małgorzata Błażej, Paweł Mackiewicz, Dorota Mackiewicz, Paweł BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The standard genetic code (SGC) is a unique set of rules which assign amino acids to codons. Similar amino acids tend to have similar codons indicating that the code evolved to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements in proteins, caused by mutations or translational errors. However, if such optimization in fact occurred, many different properties of amino acids must have been taken into account during the code evolution. Therefore, this problem can be reformulated as a multi-objective optimization task, in which the selection constraints are represented by measures based on various amino acid properties. RESULTS: To study the optimality of the SGC we applied a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and we used the representatives of eight clusters, which grouped over 500 indices describing various physicochemical properties of amino acids. Thanks to that we avoided an arbitrary choice of amino acid features as optimization criteria. As a consequence, we were able to conduct a more general study on the properties of the SGC than the ones presented so far in other papers on this topic. We considered two models of the genetic code, one preserving the characteristic codon blocks structure of the SGC and the other without this restriction. The results revealed that the SGC could be significantly improved in terms of error minimization, hereby it is not fully optimized. Its structure differs significantly from the structure of the codes optimized to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements. On the other hand, using newly defined quality measures that placed the SGC in the global space of theoretical genetic codes, we showed that the SGC is definitely closer to the codes that minimize the costs of amino acids replacements than those maximizing them. CONCLUSIONS: The standard genetic code represents most likely only partially optimized systems, which emerged under the influence of many different factors. Our findings can be useful to researchers involved in modifying the genetic code of the living organisms and designing artificial ones. BioMed Central 2018-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6293558/ /pubmed/30545289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1304-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wnętrzak, Małgorzata
Błażej, Paweł
Mackiewicz, Dorota
Mackiewicz, Paweł
The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
title The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
title_full The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
title_fullStr The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
title_full_unstemmed The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
title_short The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
title_sort optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30545289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1304-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wnetrzakmałgorzata theoptimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT błazejpaweł theoptimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT mackiewiczdorota theoptimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT mackiewiczpaweł theoptimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT wnetrzakmałgorzata optimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT błazejpaweł optimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT mackiewiczdorota optimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT mackiewiczpaweł optimalityofthestandardgeneticcodeassessedbyaneightobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm