Cargando…

Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients

BACKGROUND: Multiple disciplines have described an “after-hours effect” relating to worsened mortality and morbidity outside regular working hours. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether diagnostic accuracy of a common surgical condition worsened after regular hours. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Kirit, Wilson, Michael S. J., Coats, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-018-0180-2
_version_ 1783380577366310912
author Singh, Kirit
Wilson, Michael S. J.
Coats, Maria
author_facet Singh, Kirit
Wilson, Michael S. J.
Coats, Maria
author_sort Singh, Kirit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple disciplines have described an “after-hours effect” relating to worsened mortality and morbidity outside regular working hours. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether diagnostic accuracy of a common surgical condition worsened after regular hours. METHODS: Electronic operative records for all non-infant patients (age > 4 years) operated on at a single centre for presumed acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed over a 56-month period (06/17/2012–02/01/2017). The primary outcome measure of unknown diagnosis was compared between those performed in regular hours (08:00–17:00) or off hours (17:01–07:59). Pre-clinical biochemistry and pre-morbid status were recorded to determine case heterogeneity between the two groups, along with secondary outcomes of length of stay and complication rate. RESULTS: Out of 289 procedures, 274 cases were deemed eligible for inclusion. Of the 133 performed in regular hours, 79% were appendicitis, compared to 74% of the 141 procedures performed off hours. The percentage of patients with an unknown diagnosis was 6% in regular hours compared to 15% off hours (RR 2.48; 95% CI 1.14–5.39). This was accompanied by increased numbers of registrars (residents in training) leading procedures off hours (37% compared to 24% in regular hours). Pre-morbid status, biochemistry, length of stay and post-operative complication rate showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that the rate of unknown diagnoses for acute appendicitis increases overnight, potentially reflecting increased numbers of unnecessary procedures being performed off hours due to poorer diagnostic accuracy. Reduced levels of staffing, availability of diagnostic modalities and changes to workforce training may explain this, but further prospective work is required. Potential solutions may include protocolizing the management of common acute surgical conditions and making more use of non-resident on call senior colleagues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62936312018-12-18 Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients Singh, Kirit Wilson, Michael S. J. Coats, Maria Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Multiple disciplines have described an “after-hours effect” relating to worsened mortality and morbidity outside regular working hours. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether diagnostic accuracy of a common surgical condition worsened after regular hours. METHODS: Electronic operative records for all non-infant patients (age > 4 years) operated on at a single centre for presumed acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed over a 56-month period (06/17/2012–02/01/2017). The primary outcome measure of unknown diagnosis was compared between those performed in regular hours (08:00–17:00) or off hours (17:01–07:59). Pre-clinical biochemistry and pre-morbid status were recorded to determine case heterogeneity between the two groups, along with secondary outcomes of length of stay and complication rate. RESULTS: Out of 289 procedures, 274 cases were deemed eligible for inclusion. Of the 133 performed in regular hours, 79% were appendicitis, compared to 74% of the 141 procedures performed off hours. The percentage of patients with an unknown diagnosis was 6% in regular hours compared to 15% off hours (RR 2.48; 95% CI 1.14–5.39). This was accompanied by increased numbers of registrars (residents in training) leading procedures off hours (37% compared to 24% in regular hours). Pre-morbid status, biochemistry, length of stay and post-operative complication rate showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that the rate of unknown diagnoses for acute appendicitis increases overnight, potentially reflecting increased numbers of unnecessary procedures being performed off hours due to poorer diagnostic accuracy. Reduced levels of staffing, availability of diagnostic modalities and changes to workforce training may explain this, but further prospective work is required. Potential solutions may include protocolizing the management of common acute surgical conditions and making more use of non-resident on call senior colleagues. BioMed Central 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6293631/ /pubmed/30564285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-018-0180-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Singh, Kirit
Wilson, Michael S. J.
Coats, Maria
Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients
title Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients
title_full Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients
title_fullStr Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients
title_full_unstemmed Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients
title_short Does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? A retrospective observational study of 274 patients
title_sort does time of surgery influence the rate of false-negative appendectomies? a retrospective observational study of 274 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-018-0180-2
work_keys_str_mv AT singhkirit doestimeofsurgeryinfluencetherateoffalsenegativeappendectomiesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof274patients
AT wilsonmichaelsj doestimeofsurgeryinfluencetherateoffalsenegativeappendectomiesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof274patients
AT coatsmaria doestimeofsurgeryinfluencetherateoffalsenegativeappendectomiesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof274patients