Cargando…

Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cesarean section increased worldwide with subsequent increase in the risk of cesarean section scar dehiscence (CSSD). The clinical significance and the management of the CSSD are still unclear. CASE REPORTS: Here, we report two cases of CSSD. A 35-year-old woman, gravida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelazim, Ibrahim A., Shikanova, Svetlana, Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva, Karimova, Bakyt, Sarsembayev, Mukhit, Starchenko, Tatyana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613559
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_18
_version_ 1783380639612928000
author Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
Shikanova, Svetlana
Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva
Karimova, Bakyt
Sarsembayev, Mukhit
Starchenko, Tatyana
author_facet Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
Shikanova, Svetlana
Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva
Karimova, Bakyt
Sarsembayev, Mukhit
Starchenko, Tatyana
author_sort Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of cesarean section increased worldwide with subsequent increase in the risk of cesarean section scar dehiscence (CSSD). The clinical significance and the management of the CSSD are still unclear. CASE REPORTS: Here, we report two cases of CSSD. A 35-year-old woman, gravida 2, previous CS, due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and breech presentation at 30 weeks, was admitted for elective CS at 38(+3d) weeks’ gestation. During the second elective CS, it was seen that the site of the previous CS scar was very thin along its whole length and the anterior uterine wall was completely deficient, leaving visible bulging fetal membranes and moving baby underneath. A 32-year-old woman, previous three CSs, was admitted as unbooked case without any antenatal records at 29(+4d) weeks’ gestation, triplet pregnancy with preterm labor. She received betamethasone and magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) for fetal lung and fetal brain protection, respectively, followed by emergency CS. During the CS, the previous CSs scars were dehiscent over more than half of its length and the anterior uterine wall was missing leaving visible fetal membranes. The uterine incision of the studied women was repaired in two layers using vicryl 0 interrupted simple stitches for the first layer, followed by interrupted mattress stitches for the second layer. The studied women had uneventful postoperative recovery and were discharged from the hospital after counseling regarding intraoperative findings, uterine incisions repair, and future pregnancies. CONCLUSION: It is useful to assess the lower uterine segment of women with previous CS using the available ultrasound facilities. If the CSSD is diagnosed before the elective CS, the surgeon should prepare himself with the safest uterine incision with least possible complications and the best way of repair of the defective or dehiscent uterine wall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62938992019-01-04 Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. Shikanova, Svetlana Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva Karimova, Bakyt Sarsembayev, Mukhit Starchenko, Tatyana J Family Med Prim Care Case Report BACKGROUND: The incidence of cesarean section increased worldwide with subsequent increase in the risk of cesarean section scar dehiscence (CSSD). The clinical significance and the management of the CSSD are still unclear. CASE REPORTS: Here, we report two cases of CSSD. A 35-year-old woman, gravida 2, previous CS, due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and breech presentation at 30 weeks, was admitted for elective CS at 38(+3d) weeks’ gestation. During the second elective CS, it was seen that the site of the previous CS scar was very thin along its whole length and the anterior uterine wall was completely deficient, leaving visible bulging fetal membranes and moving baby underneath. A 32-year-old woman, previous three CSs, was admitted as unbooked case without any antenatal records at 29(+4d) weeks’ gestation, triplet pregnancy with preterm labor. She received betamethasone and magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) for fetal lung and fetal brain protection, respectively, followed by emergency CS. During the CS, the previous CSs scars were dehiscent over more than half of its length and the anterior uterine wall was missing leaving visible fetal membranes. The uterine incision of the studied women was repaired in two layers using vicryl 0 interrupted simple stitches for the first layer, followed by interrupted mattress stitches for the second layer. The studied women had uneventful postoperative recovery and were discharged from the hospital after counseling regarding intraoperative findings, uterine incisions repair, and future pregnancies. CONCLUSION: It is useful to assess the lower uterine segment of women with previous CS using the available ultrasound facilities. If the CSSD is diagnosed before the elective CS, the surgeon should prepare himself with the safest uterine incision with least possible complications and the best way of repair of the defective or dehiscent uterine wall. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6293899/ /pubmed/30613559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Report
Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
Shikanova, Svetlana
Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva
Karimova, Bakyt
Sarsembayev, Mukhit
Starchenko, Tatyana
Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
title Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
title_full Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
title_fullStr Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
title_short Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
title_sort cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: case reports
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613559
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_18
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelazimibrahima cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports
AT shikanovasvetlana cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports
AT kanshaiymsakiyeva cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports
AT karimovabakyt cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports
AT sarsembayevmukhit cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports
AT starchenkotatyana cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports