Cargando…
Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cesarean section increased worldwide with subsequent increase in the risk of cesarean section scar dehiscence (CSSD). The clinical significance and the management of the CSSD are still unclear. CASE REPORTS: Here, we report two cases of CSSD. A 35-year-old woman, gravida...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_18 |
_version_ | 1783380639612928000 |
---|---|
author | Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. Shikanova, Svetlana Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva Karimova, Bakyt Sarsembayev, Mukhit Starchenko, Tatyana |
author_facet | Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. Shikanova, Svetlana Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva Karimova, Bakyt Sarsembayev, Mukhit Starchenko, Tatyana |
author_sort | Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The incidence of cesarean section increased worldwide with subsequent increase in the risk of cesarean section scar dehiscence (CSSD). The clinical significance and the management of the CSSD are still unclear. CASE REPORTS: Here, we report two cases of CSSD. A 35-year-old woman, gravida 2, previous CS, due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and breech presentation at 30 weeks, was admitted for elective CS at 38(+3d) weeks’ gestation. During the second elective CS, it was seen that the site of the previous CS scar was very thin along its whole length and the anterior uterine wall was completely deficient, leaving visible bulging fetal membranes and moving baby underneath. A 32-year-old woman, previous three CSs, was admitted as unbooked case without any antenatal records at 29(+4d) weeks’ gestation, triplet pregnancy with preterm labor. She received betamethasone and magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) for fetal lung and fetal brain protection, respectively, followed by emergency CS. During the CS, the previous CSs scars were dehiscent over more than half of its length and the anterior uterine wall was missing leaving visible fetal membranes. The uterine incision of the studied women was repaired in two layers using vicryl 0 interrupted simple stitches for the first layer, followed by interrupted mattress stitches for the second layer. The studied women had uneventful postoperative recovery and were discharged from the hospital after counseling regarding intraoperative findings, uterine incisions repair, and future pregnancies. CONCLUSION: It is useful to assess the lower uterine segment of women with previous CS using the available ultrasound facilities. If the CSSD is diagnosed before the elective CS, the surgeon should prepare himself with the safest uterine incision with least possible complications and the best way of repair of the defective or dehiscent uterine wall. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6293899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62938992019-01-04 Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. Shikanova, Svetlana Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva Karimova, Bakyt Sarsembayev, Mukhit Starchenko, Tatyana J Family Med Prim Care Case Report BACKGROUND: The incidence of cesarean section increased worldwide with subsequent increase in the risk of cesarean section scar dehiscence (CSSD). The clinical significance and the management of the CSSD are still unclear. CASE REPORTS: Here, we report two cases of CSSD. A 35-year-old woman, gravida 2, previous CS, due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and breech presentation at 30 weeks, was admitted for elective CS at 38(+3d) weeks’ gestation. During the second elective CS, it was seen that the site of the previous CS scar was very thin along its whole length and the anterior uterine wall was completely deficient, leaving visible bulging fetal membranes and moving baby underneath. A 32-year-old woman, previous three CSs, was admitted as unbooked case without any antenatal records at 29(+4d) weeks’ gestation, triplet pregnancy with preterm labor. She received betamethasone and magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) for fetal lung and fetal brain protection, respectively, followed by emergency CS. During the CS, the previous CSs scars were dehiscent over more than half of its length and the anterior uterine wall was missing leaving visible fetal membranes. The uterine incision of the studied women was repaired in two layers using vicryl 0 interrupted simple stitches for the first layer, followed by interrupted mattress stitches for the second layer. The studied women had uneventful postoperative recovery and were discharged from the hospital after counseling regarding intraoperative findings, uterine incisions repair, and future pregnancies. CONCLUSION: It is useful to assess the lower uterine segment of women with previous CS using the available ultrasound facilities. If the CSSD is diagnosed before the elective CS, the surgeon should prepare himself with the safest uterine incision with least possible complications and the best way of repair of the defective or dehiscent uterine wall. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6293899/ /pubmed/30613559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. Shikanova, Svetlana Kanshaiym, Sakiyeva Karimova, Bakyt Sarsembayev, Mukhit Starchenko, Tatyana Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports |
title | Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports |
title_full | Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports |
title_fullStr | Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports |
title_full_unstemmed | Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports |
title_short | Cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: Case reports |
title_sort | cesarean section scar dehiscence during pregnancy: case reports |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelazimibrahima cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports AT shikanovasvetlana cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports AT kanshaiymsakiyeva cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports AT karimovabakyt cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports AT sarsembayevmukhit cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports AT starchenkotatyana cesareansectionscardehiscenceduringpregnancycasereports |