Cargando…

Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND: Taking care of patients with cancer is often done at home and by family caregivers. However, these groups do not receive the necessary education regarding care at home. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to compare the effects of face-to-face and telenursing training methods on the qual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shohani, Masoumeh, Mozafari, Mosayeb, Khorshidi, Ali, Lotfi, Shohreh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_317_18
_version_ 1783380648002584576
author Shohani, Masoumeh
Mozafari, Mosayeb
Khorshidi, Ali
Lotfi, Shohreh
author_facet Shohani, Masoumeh
Mozafari, Mosayeb
Khorshidi, Ali
Lotfi, Shohreh
author_sort Shohani, Masoumeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Taking care of patients with cancer is often done at home and by family caregivers. However, these groups do not receive the necessary education regarding care at home. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to compare the effects of face-to-face and telenursing training methods on the quality of services provided by the family caregiver for patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 103 family caregivers of patients with cancer were randomly divided into 3 groups: control (N = 35), face to face (N = 34), and telenursing (N = 34). The control group only received the routine training, and the face-to-face and telenursing groups were trained for 12 weeks. Quality of care was measured using a questionnaire before and after intervention. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and analysis of variance tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: After intervention, the average total quality score for the care of patients in face-to-face (166.13 ± 13.91) and telenursing (157.76 ± 17.24) groups was significantly higher than the control group (82.51 ± 16.84) (P < 0.001). In addition, the average psychosocial care score for face-to-face group (49.06 ± 6.05) was significantly higher than telenursing group (43.83 ± 6.15) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that the two methods of training were effective on the quality of care among family caregivers of patients with cancer to a similar extent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6293933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62939332019-01-04 Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer Shohani, Masoumeh Mozafari, Mosayeb Khorshidi, Ali Lotfi, Shohreh J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Taking care of patients with cancer is often done at home and by family caregivers. However, these groups do not receive the necessary education regarding care at home. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to compare the effects of face-to-face and telenursing training methods on the quality of services provided by the family caregiver for patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 103 family caregivers of patients with cancer were randomly divided into 3 groups: control (N = 35), face to face (N = 34), and telenursing (N = 34). The control group only received the routine training, and the face-to-face and telenursing groups were trained for 12 weeks. Quality of care was measured using a questionnaire before and after intervention. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and analysis of variance tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: After intervention, the average total quality score for the care of patients in face-to-face (166.13 ± 13.91) and telenursing (157.76 ± 17.24) groups was significantly higher than the control group (82.51 ± 16.84) (P < 0.001). In addition, the average psychosocial care score for face-to-face group (49.06 ± 6.05) was significantly higher than telenursing group (43.83 ± 6.15) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that the two methods of training were effective on the quality of care among family caregivers of patients with cancer to a similar extent. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6293933/ /pubmed/30613499 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_317_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shohani, Masoumeh
Mozafari, Mosayeb
Khorshidi, Ali
Lotfi, Shohreh
Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
title Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
title_full Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
title_short Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
title_sort comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_317_18
work_keys_str_mv AT shohanimasoumeh comparingtheeffectsoffacetofaceandtelenursingeducationonthequalityoffamilycaregiverscaringinpatientswithcancer
AT mozafarimosayeb comparingtheeffectsoffacetofaceandtelenursingeducationonthequalityoffamilycaregiverscaringinpatientswithcancer
AT khorshidiali comparingtheeffectsoffacetofaceandtelenursingeducationonthequalityoffamilycaregiverscaringinpatientswithcancer
AT lotfishohreh comparingtheeffectsoffacetofaceandtelenursingeducationonthequalityoffamilycaregiverscaringinpatientswithcancer