Cargando…

Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method

BACKGROUND: Genetic screening for chromosomopathy is performed in the first trimester of pregnancy by determining fetal nuchal translucency (NT), and the pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free human chorionic gonadotropin (free-beta HCG) biomarkers in maternal serum. METHODS: We tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durković, Jasmina, Ubavić, Milan, Durković, Milica, Kis, Tibor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0022
_version_ 1783380678436454400
author Durković, Jasmina
Ubavić, Milan
Durković, Milica
Kis, Tibor
author_facet Durković, Jasmina
Ubavić, Milan
Durković, Milica
Kis, Tibor
author_sort Durković, Jasmina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic screening for chromosomopathy is performed in the first trimester of pregnancy by determining fetal nuchal translucency (NT), and the pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free human chorionic gonadotropin (free-beta HCG) biomarkers in maternal serum. METHODS: We tested the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative expected values of each marker with the aim of setting a model for prenatal screening readings. Statistical data treatment has been performed on a sample of 340 pregnant women with positive results of prenatal screening. RESULTS: Sensitivity of PAPP-A was 0.6250 (probability 62.50%), free beta HCG 0.5893 (58.93%), NT 0.1785 (17.85%). Specificity of PAPP-A was 0.5106 (probability 51.06%), free beta HCG 0.5246 (52.46%), NT 0.9718 (97.18%). Positive expected value of PAPP-A was 0.2011 (probability 20.11%), free beta HCG 0.1964 (19.64%), NT 0.556 (55.56%). Negative expected value of PAPP-A was 0.8735 (probability 87.35%), free beta HCG 0.8662 (86.62%), NT 0.8571 (85.71%). The NT marker has a significantly higher specificity, which means that its normal value will significantly reduce the final risk of trisomy 21. The sensitivity of NT is much lower than that of biochemical markers, which means that a pathological value of NT does not have a significant influence on the final risk, i.e. the significantly higher sensitivity of biochemical markers will reduce the final risk of trisomy 21. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses stress the importance of using a software which has the possibility to separate the level of a biochemical risk by correlating PAPP-A and free beta HCG and, by adding the NT marker, calculate the level of a final risk of Down syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6294102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62941022018-12-21 Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method Durković, Jasmina Ubavić, Milan Durković, Milica Kis, Tibor J Med Biochem Original Paper BACKGROUND: Genetic screening for chromosomopathy is performed in the first trimester of pregnancy by determining fetal nuchal translucency (NT), and the pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free human chorionic gonadotropin (free-beta HCG) biomarkers in maternal serum. METHODS: We tested the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative expected values of each marker with the aim of setting a model for prenatal screening readings. Statistical data treatment has been performed on a sample of 340 pregnant women with positive results of prenatal screening. RESULTS: Sensitivity of PAPP-A was 0.6250 (probability 62.50%), free beta HCG 0.5893 (58.93%), NT 0.1785 (17.85%). Specificity of PAPP-A was 0.5106 (probability 51.06%), free beta HCG 0.5246 (52.46%), NT 0.9718 (97.18%). Positive expected value of PAPP-A was 0.2011 (probability 20.11%), free beta HCG 0.1964 (19.64%), NT 0.556 (55.56%). Negative expected value of PAPP-A was 0.8735 (probability 87.35%), free beta HCG 0.8662 (86.62%), NT 0.8571 (85.71%). The NT marker has a significantly higher specificity, which means that its normal value will significantly reduce the final risk of trisomy 21. The sensitivity of NT is much lower than that of biochemical markers, which means that a pathological value of NT does not have a significant influence on the final risk, i.e. the significantly higher sensitivity of biochemical markers will reduce the final risk of trisomy 21. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses stress the importance of using a software which has the possibility to separate the level of a biochemical risk by correlating PAPP-A and free beta HCG and, by adding the NT marker, calculate the level of a final risk of Down syndrome. Sciendo 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6294102/ /pubmed/30581343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0022 Text en © 2018 Jasmina Durković, Milan Ubavić, Milica Durković, Tibor Kis published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Durković, Jasmina
Ubavić, Milan
Durković, Milica
Kis, Tibor
Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method
title Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method
title_full Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method
title_fullStr Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method
title_short Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method
title_sort prenatal screening markers for down syndrome: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative expected value method
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0022
work_keys_str_mv AT durkovicjasmina prenatalscreeningmarkersfordownsyndromesensitivityspecificitypositiveandnegativeexpectedvaluemethod
AT ubavicmilan prenatalscreeningmarkersfordownsyndromesensitivityspecificitypositiveandnegativeexpectedvaluemethod
AT durkovicmilica prenatalscreeningmarkersfordownsyndromesensitivityspecificitypositiveandnegativeexpectedvaluemethod
AT kistibor prenatalscreeningmarkersfordownsyndromesensitivityspecificitypositiveandnegativeexpectedvaluemethod