Cargando…
Sigma metric revisited: True known mistakes
Six Sigma methodology has been used successfully in industry since the mid-1980s. Unfortunately, the same success has not been achieved in laboratory medicine. In this case, although the multidisciplinary structure of laboratory medicine is an important factor, the concept and statistical principles...
Autores principales: | Coskun, Abdurrahman, Serteser, Mustafa, Ünsal, Ibrahim |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591816 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.010902 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Six Sigma revisited: We need evidence to include a 1.5 SD shift in the extraanalytical phase of the total testing process
por: Coskun, Abdurrahman, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Sigma metrics in laboratory medicine revisited: We are on the right road with the wrong map
por: Oosterhuis, Wytze P., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Biological variations of ADAMTS13 and von Willebrand factor in human adults
por: Kilercik, Meltem, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Covid, critical realism and category‐mistake
por: Paton, Calum
Publicado: (2022) -
Post-translational modifications of transthyretin affect the triiodonine-binding potential
por: Henze, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2015)