Cargando…
Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
IMPORTANCE: The recently updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cancer staging, the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC 8), includes revisions to definitions of T1a vs T1b or greater. The Melanoma Pathology Study database affords a comparison of pathologists’ c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0083 |
_version_ | 1783380735782027264 |
---|---|
author | Elmore, Joann G. Elder, David E. Barnhill, Raymond L. Knezevich, Stevan R. Longton, Gary M. Titus, Linda J. Weinstock, Martin A. Pepe, Margaret S. Nelson, Heidi D. Reisch, Lisa M. Radick, Andrea C. Piepkorn, Michael W. |
author_facet | Elmore, Joann G. Elder, David E. Barnhill, Raymond L. Knezevich, Stevan R. Longton, Gary M. Titus, Linda J. Weinstock, Martin A. Pepe, Margaret S. Nelson, Heidi D. Reisch, Lisa M. Radick, Andrea C. Piepkorn, Michael W. |
author_sort | Elmore, Joann G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: The recently updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cancer staging, the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC 8), includes revisions to definitions of T1a vs T1b or greater. The Melanoma Pathology Study database affords a comparison of pathologists’ concordance and reproducibility in the microstaging of melanoma according to both the existing 7th edition (AJCC 7) and the new AJCC 8. OBJECTIVE: To compare AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 to examine whether changes to the definitions of T1a and T1b or greater are associated with changes in concordance and reproducibility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study conducted as part of the national Melanoma Pathology Study across US states, 187 pathologists interpreting melanocytic skin lesions in practice completed 4342 independent case interpretations of 116 invasive melanoma cases. A consensus reference diagnosis and participating pathologists’ interpretations were classified into the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis class IV (T1a) or class V (≥T1b) using both the AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Concordance with consensus reference diagnosis, interobserver reproducibility, and intraobserver reproducibility. RESULTS: For T1a diagnoses, participating pathologists’ concordance with the consensus reference diagnosis increased from 44% (95% CI, 41%-48%) to 54% (95% CI, 51%-57%) using AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria, respectively. The concordance for cases of T1b or greater increased from 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%) to 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%). Intraobserver reproducibility of diagnoses also improved, increasing from 59% (95% CI, 56%-63%) to 64% (95% CI, 62%-67%) for T1a invasive melanoma, and from 74% (95% CI, 71%-76%) to 77% (95% CI, 74%-79%) for T1b or greater invasive melanoma cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Melanoma staging in AJCC 8 shows greater reproducibility and higher concordance with a reference standard. Improved classification of invasive melanoma can be expected after implementation of AJCC 8, suggesting a positive impact on patients. However, despite improvement, concordance and reproducibility remain low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6294444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62944442018-12-14 Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Elmore, Joann G. Elder, David E. Barnhill, Raymond L. Knezevich, Stevan R. Longton, Gary M. Titus, Linda J. Weinstock, Martin A. Pepe, Margaret S. Nelson, Heidi D. Reisch, Lisa M. Radick, Andrea C. Piepkorn, Michael W. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The recently updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cancer staging, the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC 8), includes revisions to definitions of T1a vs T1b or greater. The Melanoma Pathology Study database affords a comparison of pathologists’ concordance and reproducibility in the microstaging of melanoma according to both the existing 7th edition (AJCC 7) and the new AJCC 8. OBJECTIVE: To compare AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 to examine whether changes to the definitions of T1a and T1b or greater are associated with changes in concordance and reproducibility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study conducted as part of the national Melanoma Pathology Study across US states, 187 pathologists interpreting melanocytic skin lesions in practice completed 4342 independent case interpretations of 116 invasive melanoma cases. A consensus reference diagnosis and participating pathologists’ interpretations were classified into the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis class IV (T1a) or class V (≥T1b) using both the AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Concordance with consensus reference diagnosis, interobserver reproducibility, and intraobserver reproducibility. RESULTS: For T1a diagnoses, participating pathologists’ concordance with the consensus reference diagnosis increased from 44% (95% CI, 41%-48%) to 54% (95% CI, 51%-57%) using AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria, respectively. The concordance for cases of T1b or greater increased from 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%) to 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%). Intraobserver reproducibility of diagnoses also improved, increasing from 59% (95% CI, 56%-63%) to 64% (95% CI, 62%-67%) for T1a invasive melanoma, and from 74% (95% CI, 71%-76%) to 77% (95% CI, 74%-79%) for T1b or greater invasive melanoma cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Melanoma staging in AJCC 8 shows greater reproducibility and higher concordance with a reference standard. Improved classification of invasive melanoma can be expected after implementation of AJCC 8, suggesting a positive impact on patients. However, despite improvement, concordance and reproducibility remain low. American Medical Association 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6294444/ /pubmed/30556054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0083 Text en Copyright 2018 Elmore JG et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Elmore, Joann G. Elder, David E. Barnhill, Raymond L. Knezevich, Stevan R. Longton, Gary M. Titus, Linda J. Weinstock, Martin A. Pepe, Margaret S. Nelson, Heidi D. Reisch, Lisa M. Radick, Andrea C. Piepkorn, Michael W. Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual |
title | Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual |
title_full | Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual |
title_fullStr | Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual |
title_full_unstemmed | Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual |
title_short | Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual |
title_sort | concordance and reproducibility of melanoma staging according to the 7th vs 8th edition of the ajcc cancer staging manual |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elmorejoanng concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT elderdavide concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT barnhillraymondl concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT knezevichstevanr concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT longtongarym concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT tituslindaj concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT weinstockmartina concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT pepemargarets concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT nelsonheidid concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT reischlisam concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT radickandreac concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual AT piepkornmichaelw concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual |