Cargando…

Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual

IMPORTANCE: The recently updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cancer staging, the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC 8), includes revisions to definitions of T1a vs T1b or greater. The Melanoma Pathology Study database affords a comparison of pathologists’ c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmore, Joann G., Elder, David E., Barnhill, Raymond L., Knezevich, Stevan R., Longton, Gary M., Titus, Linda J., Weinstock, Martin A., Pepe, Margaret S., Nelson, Heidi D., Reisch, Lisa M., Radick, Andrea C., Piepkorn, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0083
_version_ 1783380735782027264
author Elmore, Joann G.
Elder, David E.
Barnhill, Raymond L.
Knezevich, Stevan R.
Longton, Gary M.
Titus, Linda J.
Weinstock, Martin A.
Pepe, Margaret S.
Nelson, Heidi D.
Reisch, Lisa M.
Radick, Andrea C.
Piepkorn, Michael W.
author_facet Elmore, Joann G.
Elder, David E.
Barnhill, Raymond L.
Knezevich, Stevan R.
Longton, Gary M.
Titus, Linda J.
Weinstock, Martin A.
Pepe, Margaret S.
Nelson, Heidi D.
Reisch, Lisa M.
Radick, Andrea C.
Piepkorn, Michael W.
author_sort Elmore, Joann G.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The recently updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cancer staging, the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC 8), includes revisions to definitions of T1a vs T1b or greater. The Melanoma Pathology Study database affords a comparison of pathologists’ concordance and reproducibility in the microstaging of melanoma according to both the existing 7th edition (AJCC 7) and the new AJCC 8. OBJECTIVE: To compare AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 to examine whether changes to the definitions of T1a and T1b or greater are associated with changes in concordance and reproducibility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study conducted as part of the national Melanoma Pathology Study across US states, 187 pathologists interpreting melanocytic skin lesions in practice completed 4342 independent case interpretations of 116 invasive melanoma cases. A consensus reference diagnosis and participating pathologists’ interpretations were classified into the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis class IV (T1a) or class V (≥T1b) using both the AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Concordance with consensus reference diagnosis, interobserver reproducibility, and intraobserver reproducibility. RESULTS: For T1a diagnoses, participating pathologists’ concordance with the consensus reference diagnosis increased from 44% (95% CI, 41%-48%) to 54% (95% CI, 51%-57%) using AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria, respectively. The concordance for cases of T1b or greater increased from 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%) to 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%). Intraobserver reproducibility of diagnoses also improved, increasing from 59% (95% CI, 56%-63%) to 64% (95% CI, 62%-67%) for T1a invasive melanoma, and from 74% (95% CI, 71%-76%) to 77% (95% CI, 74%-79%) for T1b or greater invasive melanoma cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Melanoma staging in AJCC 8 shows greater reproducibility and higher concordance with a reference standard. Improved classification of invasive melanoma can be expected after implementation of AJCC 8, suggesting a positive impact on patients. However, despite improvement, concordance and reproducibility remain low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6294444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62944442018-12-14 Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Elmore, Joann G. Elder, David E. Barnhill, Raymond L. Knezevich, Stevan R. Longton, Gary M. Titus, Linda J. Weinstock, Martin A. Pepe, Margaret S. Nelson, Heidi D. Reisch, Lisa M. Radick, Andrea C. Piepkorn, Michael W. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The recently updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cancer staging, the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC 8), includes revisions to definitions of T1a vs T1b or greater. The Melanoma Pathology Study database affords a comparison of pathologists’ concordance and reproducibility in the microstaging of melanoma according to both the existing 7th edition (AJCC 7) and the new AJCC 8. OBJECTIVE: To compare AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 to examine whether changes to the definitions of T1a and T1b or greater are associated with changes in concordance and reproducibility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study conducted as part of the national Melanoma Pathology Study across US states, 187 pathologists interpreting melanocytic skin lesions in practice completed 4342 independent case interpretations of 116 invasive melanoma cases. A consensus reference diagnosis and participating pathologists’ interpretations were classified into the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis class IV (T1a) or class V (≥T1b) using both the AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Concordance with consensus reference diagnosis, interobserver reproducibility, and intraobserver reproducibility. RESULTS: For T1a diagnoses, participating pathologists’ concordance with the consensus reference diagnosis increased from 44% (95% CI, 41%-48%) to 54% (95% CI, 51%-57%) using AJCC 7 and AJCC 8 criteria, respectively. The concordance for cases of T1b or greater increased from 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%) to 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%). Intraobserver reproducibility of diagnoses also improved, increasing from 59% (95% CI, 56%-63%) to 64% (95% CI, 62%-67%) for T1a invasive melanoma, and from 74% (95% CI, 71%-76%) to 77% (95% CI, 74%-79%) for T1b or greater invasive melanoma cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Melanoma staging in AJCC 8 shows greater reproducibility and higher concordance with a reference standard. Improved classification of invasive melanoma can be expected after implementation of AJCC 8, suggesting a positive impact on patients. However, despite improvement, concordance and reproducibility remain low. American Medical Association 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6294444/ /pubmed/30556054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0083 Text en Copyright 2018 Elmore JG et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Elmore, Joann G.
Elder, David E.
Barnhill, Raymond L.
Knezevich, Stevan R.
Longton, Gary M.
Titus, Linda J.
Weinstock, Martin A.
Pepe, Margaret S.
Nelson, Heidi D.
Reisch, Lisa M.
Radick, Andrea C.
Piepkorn, Michael W.
Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
title Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
title_full Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
title_fullStr Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
title_full_unstemmed Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
title_short Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
title_sort concordance and reproducibility of melanoma staging according to the 7th vs 8th edition of the ajcc cancer staging manual
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0083
work_keys_str_mv AT elmorejoanng concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT elderdavide concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT barnhillraymondl concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT knezevichstevanr concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT longtongarym concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT tituslindaj concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT weinstockmartina concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT pepemargarets concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT nelsonheidid concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT reischlisam concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT radickandreac concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual
AT piepkornmichaelw concordanceandreproducibilityofmelanomastagingaccordingtothe7thvs8theditionoftheajcccancerstagingmanual