Cargando…

Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing

Testing of patients with genetics-related disorders is in progress of shifting from single gene assays to gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Since WGS is unquestionably becoming a new foundation for molecular analyses, we decided to compare three c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Supernat, Anna, Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar, Steen, Vidar M., Stokowy, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36177-7
_version_ 1783380784721166336
author Supernat, Anna
Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar
Steen, Vidar M.
Stokowy, Tomasz
author_facet Supernat, Anna
Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar
Steen, Vidar M.
Stokowy, Tomasz
author_sort Supernat, Anna
collection PubMed
description Testing of patients with genetics-related disorders is in progress of shifting from single gene assays to gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Since WGS is unquestionably becoming a new foundation for molecular analyses, we decided to compare three currently used tools for variant calling of human whole genome sequencing data. We tested DeepVariant, a new TensorFlow machine learning-based variant caller, and compared this tool to GATK 4.0 and SpeedSeq, using 30×, 15× and 10× WGS data of the well-known NA12878 DNA reference sample. According to our comparison, the performance on SNV calling was almost similar in 30× data, with all three variant callers reaching F-Scores (i.e. harmonic mean of recall and precision) equal to 0.98. In contrast, DeepVariant was more precise in indel calling than GATK and SpeedSeq, as demonstrated by F-Scores of 0.94, 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. We conclude that the DeepVariant tool has great potential and usefulness for analysis of WGS data in medical genetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6294778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62947782018-12-24 Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing Supernat, Anna Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar Steen, Vidar M. Stokowy, Tomasz Sci Rep Article Testing of patients with genetics-related disorders is in progress of shifting from single gene assays to gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Since WGS is unquestionably becoming a new foundation for molecular analyses, we decided to compare three currently used tools for variant calling of human whole genome sequencing data. We tested DeepVariant, a new TensorFlow machine learning-based variant caller, and compared this tool to GATK 4.0 and SpeedSeq, using 30×, 15× and 10× WGS data of the well-known NA12878 DNA reference sample. According to our comparison, the performance on SNV calling was almost similar in 30× data, with all three variant callers reaching F-Scores (i.e. harmonic mean of recall and precision) equal to 0.98. In contrast, DeepVariant was more precise in indel calling than GATK and SpeedSeq, as demonstrated by F-Scores of 0.94, 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. We conclude that the DeepVariant tool has great potential and usefulness for analysis of WGS data in medical genetics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6294778/ /pubmed/30552369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36177-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Supernat, Anna
Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar
Steen, Vidar M.
Stokowy, Tomasz
Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
title Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
title_full Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
title_fullStr Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
title_short Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
title_sort comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36177-7
work_keys_str_mv AT supernatanna comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing
AT vidarssonoskarvaldimar comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing
AT steenvidarm comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing
AT stokowytomasz comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing