Cargando…
Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
Testing of patients with genetics-related disorders is in progress of shifting from single gene assays to gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Since WGS is unquestionably becoming a new foundation for molecular analyses, we decided to compare three c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36177-7 |
_version_ | 1783380784721166336 |
---|---|
author | Supernat, Anna Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar Steen, Vidar M. Stokowy, Tomasz |
author_facet | Supernat, Anna Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar Steen, Vidar M. Stokowy, Tomasz |
author_sort | Supernat, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Testing of patients with genetics-related disorders is in progress of shifting from single gene assays to gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Since WGS is unquestionably becoming a new foundation for molecular analyses, we decided to compare three currently used tools for variant calling of human whole genome sequencing data. We tested DeepVariant, a new TensorFlow machine learning-based variant caller, and compared this tool to GATK 4.0 and SpeedSeq, using 30×, 15× and 10× WGS data of the well-known NA12878 DNA reference sample. According to our comparison, the performance on SNV calling was almost similar in 30× data, with all three variant callers reaching F-Scores (i.e. harmonic mean of recall and precision) equal to 0.98. In contrast, DeepVariant was more precise in indel calling than GATK and SpeedSeq, as demonstrated by F-Scores of 0.94, 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. We conclude that the DeepVariant tool has great potential and usefulness for analysis of WGS data in medical genetics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6294778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62947782018-12-24 Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing Supernat, Anna Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar Steen, Vidar M. Stokowy, Tomasz Sci Rep Article Testing of patients with genetics-related disorders is in progress of shifting from single gene assays to gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Since WGS is unquestionably becoming a new foundation for molecular analyses, we decided to compare three currently used tools for variant calling of human whole genome sequencing data. We tested DeepVariant, a new TensorFlow machine learning-based variant caller, and compared this tool to GATK 4.0 and SpeedSeq, using 30×, 15× and 10× WGS data of the well-known NA12878 DNA reference sample. According to our comparison, the performance on SNV calling was almost similar in 30× data, with all three variant callers reaching F-Scores (i.e. harmonic mean of recall and precision) equal to 0.98. In contrast, DeepVariant was more precise in indel calling than GATK and SpeedSeq, as demonstrated by F-Scores of 0.94, 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. We conclude that the DeepVariant tool has great potential and usefulness for analysis of WGS data in medical genetics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6294778/ /pubmed/30552369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36177-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Supernat, Anna Vidarsson, Oskar Valdimar Steen, Vidar M. Stokowy, Tomasz Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
title | Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
title_full | Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
title_short | Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
title_sort | comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30552369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36177-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT supernatanna comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing AT vidarssonoskarvaldimar comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing AT steenvidarm comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing AT stokowytomasz comparisonofthreevariantcallersforhumanwholegenomesequencing |