Cargando…

Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women

BACKGROUND: The determination of foetal Rhesus D (RHD) status allows appropriate use of IgRh prophylaxis by restricting its use to cases of RHD feto-maternal incompatibilities. There is a degree of uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of foetal RHD determination, yet screening programs are being...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darlington, Meryl, Carbonne, Bruno, Mailloux, Agnès, Brossard, Yves, Levy-Mozziconacci, Annie, Cortey, Anne, Maoulida, Hassani, Simon, Tabassome, Rousseau, Alexandra, Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2114-5
_version_ 1783380839622508544
author Darlington, Meryl
Carbonne, Bruno
Mailloux, Agnès
Brossard, Yves
Levy-Mozziconacci, Annie
Cortey, Anne
Maoulida, Hassani
Simon, Tabassome
Rousseau, Alexandra
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
author_facet Darlington, Meryl
Carbonne, Bruno
Mailloux, Agnès
Brossard, Yves
Levy-Mozziconacci, Annie
Cortey, Anne
Maoulida, Hassani
Simon, Tabassome
Rousseau, Alexandra
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
author_sort Darlington, Meryl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The determination of foetal Rhesus D (RHD) status allows appropriate use of IgRh prophylaxis by restricting its use to cases of RHD feto-maternal incompatibilities. There is a degree of uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of foetal RHD determination, yet screening programs are being introduced into clinical practice in many countries. This paper evaluates the impact of non-invasive foetal Rhesus D (RHD) status determination on the costs of managing RHD-negative pregnant women and on the appropriate use of anti-D prophylaxis in a large sample of RHD-negative pregnant women using individual prospectively collected clinical and economic data. METHODS: A prospective two-armed trial of RHD negative pregnant women was performed in 11 French Obstetric Departments. Non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping was performed before 26 weeks' gestation in the experimental arm whereas the control arm participants received usual care. The costs associated with patient management in relation to their RHD negative status (biological tests, anti-D prophylaxis and visits) were calculated from inclusion to the end of the postpartum period. The costs of hospital admissions during pregnancy and delivery were also determined. RESULTS: A total of 949 patients were included by 11 centres between 2009 and 2012, and 850 completed follow-up, including medical and biological monitoring. Patients were separated into two groups: the genotyping group (n=515) and the control group (n=335). The cost of the genotyping was estimated at 140 euros per test. The total mean cost per patient was estimated at €3,259 (SD ± 1,120) and €3,004 (SD ± 1,004) in the genotyping and control groups respectively. The cost of delivery represented three quarters of the total cost in both groups. The performance of managing appropriately RHD negative anti-D prophylaxis was 88% in the genotyping group, versus 65% in the control group. Using the costs related to RHD status (biological tests, anti-D immunoglobulin injections and visits) the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to be €578 for each percentage gain in women receiving appropriate management. CONCLUSION: Early knowledge of the RHD status of the foetus using non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping significantly improved the management of RHD negative pregnancies with a small increase in cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registry-NCT00832962–13 January 2009 - retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2114-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6295078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62950782018-12-18 Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women Darlington, Meryl Carbonne, Bruno Mailloux, Agnès Brossard, Yves Levy-Mozziconacci, Annie Cortey, Anne Maoulida, Hassani Simon, Tabassome Rousseau, Alexandra Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The determination of foetal Rhesus D (RHD) status allows appropriate use of IgRh prophylaxis by restricting its use to cases of RHD feto-maternal incompatibilities. There is a degree of uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of foetal RHD determination, yet screening programs are being introduced into clinical practice in many countries. This paper evaluates the impact of non-invasive foetal Rhesus D (RHD) status determination on the costs of managing RHD-negative pregnant women and on the appropriate use of anti-D prophylaxis in a large sample of RHD-negative pregnant women using individual prospectively collected clinical and economic data. METHODS: A prospective two-armed trial of RHD negative pregnant women was performed in 11 French Obstetric Departments. Non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping was performed before 26 weeks' gestation in the experimental arm whereas the control arm participants received usual care. The costs associated with patient management in relation to their RHD negative status (biological tests, anti-D prophylaxis and visits) were calculated from inclusion to the end of the postpartum period. The costs of hospital admissions during pregnancy and delivery were also determined. RESULTS: A total of 949 patients were included by 11 centres between 2009 and 2012, and 850 completed follow-up, including medical and biological monitoring. Patients were separated into two groups: the genotyping group (n=515) and the control group (n=335). The cost of the genotyping was estimated at 140 euros per test. The total mean cost per patient was estimated at €3,259 (SD ± 1,120) and €3,004 (SD ± 1,004) in the genotyping and control groups respectively. The cost of delivery represented three quarters of the total cost in both groups. The performance of managing appropriately RHD negative anti-D prophylaxis was 88% in the genotyping group, versus 65% in the control group. Using the costs related to RHD status (biological tests, anti-D immunoglobulin injections and visits) the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to be €578 for each percentage gain in women receiving appropriate management. CONCLUSION: Early knowledge of the RHD status of the foetus using non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping significantly improved the management of RHD negative pregnancies with a small increase in cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registry-NCT00832962–13 January 2009 - retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2114-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6295078/ /pubmed/30547830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2114-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Darlington, Meryl
Carbonne, Bruno
Mailloux, Agnès
Brossard, Yves
Levy-Mozziconacci, Annie
Cortey, Anne
Maoulida, Hassani
Simon, Tabassome
Rousseau, Alexandra
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
title Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
title_full Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
title_fullStr Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
title_short Effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in rhesus-D negative mothers: a French multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
title_sort effectiveness and costs of non-invasive foetal rhd genotyping in rhesus-d negative mothers: a french multicentric two-arm study of 850 women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2114-5
work_keys_str_mv AT darlingtonmeryl effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT carbonnebruno effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT maillouxagnes effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT brossardyves effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT levymozziconacciannie effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT corteyanne effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT maoulidahassani effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT simontabassome effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT rousseaualexandra effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT durandzaleskiisabelle effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women
AT effectivenessandcostsofnoninvasivefoetalrhdgenotypinginrhesusdnegativemothersafrenchmulticentrictwoarmstudyof850women