Cargando…

Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study examined the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic performance of a tapered implant in various treatment protocols in patients with local and systemic risk factors (RFs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred seven NobelActive implants were inserted in 98 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saridakis, Sotirios Konstantinos, Wagner, Wilfried, Noelken, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0151-5
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study examined the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic performance of a tapered implant in various treatment protocols in patients with local and systemic risk factors (RFs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred seven NobelActive implants were inserted in 98 patients in the period from 10/2008 to 02/2015. The subdivision of the cohort was defined by local (n = 40), systemic (n = 6), local and systemic (n = 8), or without any RFs (n = 44) to analyze implant survival and marginal bone levels. RESULTS: Fifteen implants failed within the follow-up period. The mean follow-up period of the remaining implants was 34 months (range 12 to 77 months). The cumulative survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier was 91.5%. The survival rate for 93 implants in 45 patients with no RFs was 94.8% whereas it was 94% for 83 implants in 48 patients with local RFs (p = 0.618), 81.3% for 14 implants in 6 patients with systemic RFs (p = 0.173), and 76.5% for 17 implants in 6 patients with local and systemic risk factors (p = 0.006). The interproximal marginal bone level was − 0.49 ± 0.83 mm at the mesial aspect and − 0.51 ± 0.82 mm at the distal aspect in relation to implant shoulder level and showed no relevant difference in the various risk factor groups. CONCLUSIONS: It can be assumed that the negative effects of the local or/and systemic risk factors were partially compensated by the primary stability and grade of osseointegration of the NobelActive implant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of this system in patients with risk factors and immediate loading procedures.