Cargando…

Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Medical imaging outpatients often experience inadequate information provision and report high levels of anxiety. However, no studies have assessed patients’ receipt of preparatory information in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To examine medical imaging outpatients’ perceived receipt or non-rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyde, Lisa L, J Mackenzie, Lisa, Boyes, Allison W, Symonds, Michael, Brown, Sandy, Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373518765794
_version_ 1783380932836720640
author Hyde, Lisa L
J Mackenzie, Lisa
Boyes, Allison W
Symonds, Michael
Brown, Sandy
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
author_facet Hyde, Lisa L
J Mackenzie, Lisa
Boyes, Allison W
Symonds, Michael
Brown, Sandy
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
author_sort Hyde, Lisa L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical imaging outpatients often experience inadequate information provision and report high levels of anxiety. However, no studies have assessed patients’ receipt of preparatory information in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To examine medical imaging outpatients’ perceived receipt or non-receipt of preparatory information from health professionals and imaging department staff prior to their procedure. METHOD: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging outpatients at one Australian hospital self-completed a touchscreen computer survey assessing their perceived receipt of 33 guideline-recommended preparatory information items. RESULTS: Of 317 eligible patients, 280 (88%) consented to participate. Eight percent (95% confidence interval: 5%-12%) of participants reported receiving all information items. The median number of information items not received was 18 (interquartile range: 8-25). Items most frequently endorsed as “not received” were: how to manage anxiety after (74%) and during the scan (69%). Items most commonly endorsed as “received” were: reason for referral (85%) and how to find the imaging department (74%). CONCLUSION: Few medical imaging outpatients recalled receiving recommended preparatory information. Preparatory communication needs to be improved to better meet patient-centered service imperatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6295811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62958112018-12-20 Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study Hyde, Lisa L J Mackenzie, Lisa Boyes, Allison W Symonds, Michael Brown, Sandy Sanson-Fisher, Rob J Patient Exp Research Articles BACKGROUND: Medical imaging outpatients often experience inadequate information provision and report high levels of anxiety. However, no studies have assessed patients’ receipt of preparatory information in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To examine medical imaging outpatients’ perceived receipt or non-receipt of preparatory information from health professionals and imaging department staff prior to their procedure. METHOD: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging outpatients at one Australian hospital self-completed a touchscreen computer survey assessing their perceived receipt of 33 guideline-recommended preparatory information items. RESULTS: Of 317 eligible patients, 280 (88%) consented to participate. Eight percent (95% confidence interval: 5%-12%) of participants reported receiving all information items. The median number of information items not received was 18 (interquartile range: 8-25). Items most frequently endorsed as “not received” were: how to manage anxiety after (74%) and during the scan (69%). Items most commonly endorsed as “received” were: reason for referral (85%) and how to find the imaging department (74%). CONCLUSION: Few medical imaging outpatients recalled receiving recommended preparatory information. Preparatory communication needs to be improved to better meet patient-centered service imperatives. SAGE Publications 2018-04-18 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6295811/ /pubmed/30574551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373518765794 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hyde, Lisa L
J Mackenzie, Lisa
Boyes, Allison W
Symonds, Michael
Brown, Sandy
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Medical Imaging Outpatients' Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort medical imaging outpatients' experiences with receiving information required for informed consent and preparation: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30574551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373518765794
work_keys_str_mv AT hydelisal medicalimagingoutpatientsexperienceswithreceivinginformationrequiredforinformedconsentandpreparationacrosssectionalstudy
AT jmackenzielisa medicalimagingoutpatientsexperienceswithreceivinginformationrequiredforinformedconsentandpreparationacrosssectionalstudy
AT boyesallisonw medicalimagingoutpatientsexperienceswithreceivinginformationrequiredforinformedconsentandpreparationacrosssectionalstudy
AT symondsmichael medicalimagingoutpatientsexperienceswithreceivinginformationrequiredforinformedconsentandpreparationacrosssectionalstudy
AT brownsandy medicalimagingoutpatientsexperienceswithreceivinginformationrequiredforinformedconsentandpreparationacrosssectionalstudy
AT sansonfisherrob medicalimagingoutpatientsexperienceswithreceivinginformationrequiredforinformedconsentandpreparationacrosssectionalstudy