Cargando…

Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis

BACKGROUND: Passive immunization against RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is given in most western countries (including Israel) to infants of high risk groups such as premature babies, and infants with Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease. However, immunoprophylaxis costs are extreme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginsberg, Gary M., Somekh, Eli, Schlesinger, Yechiel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30554570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4
_version_ 1783380983847845888
author Ginsberg, Gary M.
Somekh, Eli
Schlesinger, Yechiel
author_facet Ginsberg, Gary M.
Somekh, Eli
Schlesinger, Yechiel
author_sort Ginsberg, Gary M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Passive immunization against RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is given in most western countries (including Israel) to infants of high risk groups such as premature babies, and infants with Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease. However, immunoprophylaxis costs are extremely high ($2800–$4200 per infant). Using cost-utility analysis criteria, we evaluate whether it is justified to expand, continue or restrict nationwide immunoprophylaxis using palivizumab of high risk infants against RSV. METHODS: Epidemiological, demographic, health service utilisation and economic data were integrated from primary (National Hospitalization Data, etc.) and secondary data sources (ie: from published articles) into a spread-sheet to calculate the cost per averted disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of vaccinating various infant risk groups. Costs of intervention included antibody plus administration costs. Treatment savings and DALYs averted were estimated from applying vaccine efficacy data to relative risks of being hospitalised and treated for RSV, including possible long-term sequelae like asthma and wheezing. RESULTS: For all the groups RSV immunoprophylaxis is clearly not cost effective as its cost per averted DALY exceeds the $105,986 guideline representing thrice the per capita Gross Domestic Product. Vaccine price would have to fall by 48.1% in order to justify vaccinating Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups respectively on pure cost-effectiveness grounds. For premature babies of < 29 weeks, 29–32 and 33–36 weeks gestation, decreases of 36.8%, 54.5% and 83.3% respectively in vaccine price are required. CONCLUSIONS: Based solely on cost-utility analysis, at current price levels it is difficult to justify the current indications for passive vaccination with Palivizumab against RSV. However, if the manufacturers would reduce the price by 54.5% then it would be cost-effective to vaccinate the Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups as well as premature babies born before the 33rd week of gestation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6296113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62961132018-12-18 Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis Ginsberg, Gary M. Somekh, Eli Schlesinger, Yechiel Isr J Health Policy Res Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Passive immunization against RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is given in most western countries (including Israel) to infants of high risk groups such as premature babies, and infants with Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease. However, immunoprophylaxis costs are extremely high ($2800–$4200 per infant). Using cost-utility analysis criteria, we evaluate whether it is justified to expand, continue or restrict nationwide immunoprophylaxis using palivizumab of high risk infants against RSV. METHODS: Epidemiological, demographic, health service utilisation and economic data were integrated from primary (National Hospitalization Data, etc.) and secondary data sources (ie: from published articles) into a spread-sheet to calculate the cost per averted disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of vaccinating various infant risk groups. Costs of intervention included antibody plus administration costs. Treatment savings and DALYs averted were estimated from applying vaccine efficacy data to relative risks of being hospitalised and treated for RSV, including possible long-term sequelae like asthma and wheezing. RESULTS: For all the groups RSV immunoprophylaxis is clearly not cost effective as its cost per averted DALY exceeds the $105,986 guideline representing thrice the per capita Gross Domestic Product. Vaccine price would have to fall by 48.1% in order to justify vaccinating Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups respectively on pure cost-effectiveness grounds. For premature babies of < 29 weeks, 29–32 and 33–36 weeks gestation, decreases of 36.8%, 54.5% and 83.3% respectively in vaccine price are required. CONCLUSIONS: Based solely on cost-utility analysis, at current price levels it is difficult to justify the current indications for passive vaccination with Palivizumab against RSV. However, if the manufacturers would reduce the price by 54.5% then it would be cost-effective to vaccinate the Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups as well as premature babies born before the 33rd week of gestation. BioMed Central 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6296113/ /pubmed/30554570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ginsberg, Gary M.
Somekh, Eli
Schlesinger, Yechiel
Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
title Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
title_full Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
title_short Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
title_sort should we use palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? – a cost-utility analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30554570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ginsberggarym shouldweusepalivizumabimmunoprophylaxisforinfantsagainstrespiratorysyncytialvirusacostutilityanalysis
AT somekheli shouldweusepalivizumabimmunoprophylaxisforinfantsagainstrespiratorysyncytialvirusacostutilityanalysis
AT schlesingeryechiel shouldweusepalivizumabimmunoprophylaxisforinfantsagainstrespiratorysyncytialvirusacostutilityanalysis