Cargando…

Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?

BACKGROUND: Implementing research findings into healthcare policy is an enduring challenge made even more difficult when policies must be developed and implemented with the help and support of multiple ideas, agendas and actors taking part in determinants of health. Only looking at mechanisms to fee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smits, Pernelle, Denis, Jean-Louis, Préval, Johanne, Lindquist, Evert, Aguirre, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0393-y
_version_ 1783380988281225216
author Smits, Pernelle
Denis, Jean-Louis
Préval, Johanne
Lindquist, Evert
Aguirre, Miguel
author_facet Smits, Pernelle
Denis, Jean-Louis
Préval, Johanne
Lindquist, Evert
Aguirre, Miguel
author_sort Smits, Pernelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementing research findings into healthcare policy is an enduring challenge made even more difficult when policies must be developed and implemented with the help and support of multiple ideas, agendas and actors taking part in determinants of health. Only looking at mechanisms to feed policy-makers with evidence or to interest researchers in the policy process will simply bring partial clues; implementing evidence-based policy also requires organisations to lead and to partner in the production and intake of scientific evidence from academics and practical evidence from one another. MAIN BODY: This Commentary argues for the need to better understand the capacities required by organisations to foster evidence-based policy in a dispersed environment. It proposes a framework of 11 brokering capacities for organisations involved in evidence-based policy. Eight of these capacities are informed by streams of research related to the roles of knowledge broker, innovation broker and policy broker. Three complementary brokering capacities are informed by our experience studying real-life evidence-based policies; these are capturing boundary knowledge, trending know-how on scientific and practical evidence-based policy, and conveying evidence outward. CONCLUSIONS: Previous guidelines on brokering capacities focused on the individual level more than on the organisational level. Beyond the individual capacities of managers, designers and implementers of new policies, there is a need to identify and assess the brokering capacities of organisations involved in evidence-based policy. The three specific organisational brokering capacities for evidence-based policy that we present offer a means for policy-makers and policy designers to reflect upon favourable environments for evidence-based policy. These capacities could also help administrators and implementation scholars to think about and develop measurements to assess the quality and readiness of organisations involved in evidence-based policy design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6296131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62961312018-12-18 Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy? Smits, Pernelle Denis, Jean-Louis Préval, Johanne Lindquist, Evert Aguirre, Miguel Health Res Policy Syst Commentary BACKGROUND: Implementing research findings into healthcare policy is an enduring challenge made even more difficult when policies must be developed and implemented with the help and support of multiple ideas, agendas and actors taking part in determinants of health. Only looking at mechanisms to feed policy-makers with evidence or to interest researchers in the policy process will simply bring partial clues; implementing evidence-based policy also requires organisations to lead and to partner in the production and intake of scientific evidence from academics and practical evidence from one another. MAIN BODY: This Commentary argues for the need to better understand the capacities required by organisations to foster evidence-based policy in a dispersed environment. It proposes a framework of 11 brokering capacities for organisations involved in evidence-based policy. Eight of these capacities are informed by streams of research related to the roles of knowledge broker, innovation broker and policy broker. Three complementary brokering capacities are informed by our experience studying real-life evidence-based policies; these are capturing boundary knowledge, trending know-how on scientific and practical evidence-based policy, and conveying evidence outward. CONCLUSIONS: Previous guidelines on brokering capacities focused on the individual level more than on the organisational level. Beyond the individual capacities of managers, designers and implementers of new policies, there is a need to identify and assess the brokering capacities of organisations involved in evidence-based policy. The three specific organisational brokering capacities for evidence-based policy that we present offer a means for policy-makers and policy designers to reflect upon favourable environments for evidence-based policy. These capacities could also help administrators and implementation scholars to think about and develop measurements to assess the quality and readiness of organisations involved in evidence-based policy design. BioMed Central 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6296131/ /pubmed/30558609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0393-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Smits, Pernelle
Denis, Jean-Louis
Préval, Johanne
Lindquist, Evert
Aguirre, Miguel
Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
title Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
title_full Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
title_fullStr Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
title_full_unstemmed Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
title_short Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
title_sort getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6296131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0393-y
work_keys_str_mv AT smitspernelle gettingevidencetotravelinsidepublicsystemswhatorganisationalbrokeringcapacitiesexistforevidencebasedpolicy
AT denisjeanlouis gettingevidencetotravelinsidepublicsystemswhatorganisationalbrokeringcapacitiesexistforevidencebasedpolicy
AT prevaljohanne gettingevidencetotravelinsidepublicsystemswhatorganisationalbrokeringcapacitiesexistforevidencebasedpolicy
AT lindquistevert gettingevidencetotravelinsidepublicsystemswhatorganisationalbrokeringcapacitiesexistforevidencebasedpolicy
AT aguirremiguel gettingevidencetotravelinsidepublicsystemswhatorganisationalbrokeringcapacitiesexistforevidencebasedpolicy